Jump to content
TSM Forums
  • entries
    83
  • comments
    811
  • views
    32925

Labels in wrestling

Sign in to follow this  
Hunter's Torn Quad

327 views

“Mark”, “smark”, and “smart” are three of the most prevalent labels given to groups of fans that gather online to talk about wrestling. We’ve seen them for years, we’ve all used them at one time or another and I hate all of them and every label like them.

 

To me, the only label a wrestling fan should be given is “fan”. There’s no such thing as a “mark”, “smark”, or “smart” fan. There is either a good fan or bad fan. A good fan either knows what he’s talking about, or admits to not knowing much about the subject at hand and accepting that there are people who know about some things better then he does. A bad fan doesn’t know what he’s talking about and cannot or will not admit to this and refuses to accept that their knowledge of the subject at hand is limited. A good fan will be open to different points of view and will listen to disparate opinions and respond with a well thought out and reasoned response that intelligently puts across their point of view and, hopefully, intelligent discussion is the result. A bad fan will get very angry and irritated at having their faults pointed out. They’ll get defensive, will probably start insulting people, and drag the discussion down in a vain attempt to maintain the illusion, if only in their own mind, that they really do know what they’re talking about.

 

You can keep making comparisons between good fans and bad fans, and the differences between the two should be obvious, but there is a better reason to stop labeling people as a “mark”, “smark”, or “smart” fan than the fact that any such label is inaccurate. The moment you label a person or a group of people with a tag like “mark”, it instantly becomes easier to dismiss their opinion or point of view out of hand because you’ve distanced yourself from the fact that the person with that opinion is a person with a mind and could have the intelligence to bring a reasonable point of view and instead have grouped them in with a segment of people that, to you, don’t have an opinion that matters as much as other people, and that’s a dangerous thing to do when you want an intelligent discussion. Dismiss people for being bad fans if you want, because bad fans are just that, bad. But don’t dismiss someone because you think they’re a “mark”, “smark”, or “smart”. You never know what you could be missing out on.

Sign in to follow this  


1 Comment


Recommended Comments

I've gotten away from the "mark, smark or smart" labelling. Now, I kind of just differentiate with "workrate fan" (someone who cares and knows about match quality), "fan" (someone who doesn't care about match quality, but can intelligently discuss other areas of wrestling) and "fanboy" (those who are in love with certain promotions or wrestlers, and can't intelligently discuss wrestling). In this case, the "good" fans are the workrate fans/fans, while the bad fans would be the fanboys. And really, I only seperate the good fans because if someone's not interested in discussing match quality, there's no point in trying to discuss it with them :P

Share this comment


Link to comment
×