IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
New plans for WTC-site building unveiled, Will be world's tallest...
Swift Terror
post Dec 19 2003, 02:58 PM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 327
Joined: 8-July 03
From: Ohio
Member No.: 3,839



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3757111/

Alright, what do you think about it? Many people have opposed the idea of putting up another very tall building, thinking it would only be a nice big target again.

Of course, it is far from becoming a reality, but it looks like the architects have reached a definitive design.

Just go to the site for pictures.


QUOTE
NEW YORK - After two world-renowned architects spent months debating the size and shape of the tower that will rise at the World Trade Center site, a compromise design was announced Friday for what could be the world’s tallest building -- and one that incorporates safety features like separate staircases for firefighters and “blast-resistant glaze” on the lobby glass.

advertisement

Negotiations had been contentious between Daniel Libeskind and David Childs, but the two were able to meet a deadline set by Gov. George Pataki and the results were unveiled Friday.

"Creative minds have different thoughts … that’s what makes great architecture, Childs told NBC's "Today" show Friday when asked about the differences in an interview ahead of the formal announcement.

'Soaring tribute'
Called the Freedom Tower, the structure will be a "soaring tribute" to the fallen heroes of Sept. 11, 2001, and to freedom, Pataki told "Today". FREE VIDEO

• Unveiled
Dec. 19: The first look of the new tower took place when New York Gov. George Pataki and architects Daniel Libeskind and David Childs joined host Katie Couric on the "Today" show.
Today show




The Lower Manhattan Development Corp., which oversees the rebuilding, says the tower will rise 1,776 feet, culminating in a spire and evoking the Statue of Liberty. Liebskin told "Today" that the height, 1,776 feet, reflects "a date that speaks to the whole world" -- America's year of independence.

To that degree, the revised plan follows the original, asymmetrical structure proposed by Libeskind, who was originally tapped as the architect to remake ground zero.

Libeskind described the spire at the top emitting a light into the sky at night, as one that would provide “a beacon of light and hope in a world that is often dark.”

Wind turbines added
But Childs succeeded in including a lattice structure filled with energy-generating windmills at the top of the building and suspension cables resembling the Brooklyn Bridge. Childs was appointed lead architect of the project by leaseholder Larry Silverstein.

The tower will be "not only beautiful but an opportunity" to make statement about the environment, Childs told "Today".

The cable suspension structure would create an open area above the building’s 70 floors of office space, and house the wind turbines, which could provide 20 percent of the building’s energy.

Libeskind, who created the Jewish Museum in Berlin but has little experience with major commercial projects, has likened the relationship with Childs, who designed the new Time Warner building in Manhattan, to a “forced marriage.”

Political motive?
Richard Meier, an architect who was a finalist for the trade center design competition won by Libeskind, questioned the timetable set by the governor, who wants construction on the tower to begin next summer before the national Republican convention begins.

“We’re not just talking about a building here; we’re talking about a large area of the city that’s being developed and there’s a relationship between this new building and everything else that’s going on,” Meier said. “If the rest of this site is developed this way, it’s going to be chaotic.”

The building is to be put up on the northwest part off the World Trade Center site, not on the footprint of the vanished towers.

The tower would include 70 stories of office space and a 276-foot spire and would be topped by broadcast antennas. The 71st and 72nd levels would contain restaurants and the 73rd level would be a viewing floor.

The building regarded as the world’s highest today is the Taipei 101 office block in Taiwan, at 1,667 feet. Malaysia’s Petronas Twin Towers are 1,483 feet tall. The 110-story World Trade Center towers were 1,350 feet tall.


$12 billion price tag
Silverstein has put the cost of the entire redevelopment project at up to $12 billion over 10 years. Previous estimates had put the cost at between $4 billion and $7 billion. The tower itself could cost $1.5 billion.

Silverstein expects $7 billion to come from insurance proceeds -- an amount that is the subject of a bitter lawsuit between the leaseholder and insurance companies. He has said $5 billion would come from government sources.

A cornerstone would be laid on the “Freedom Tower” by Sept. 11, 2004, and it would be finished by the end of 2008 or the beginning of 2009, he said.

Pataki, who has final authority over the land owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, has set 2015 as the completion date of the project. It will include a memorial to the 2,752 victims, a transportation hub, commercial and residential space, a museum and other cultural facilities.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravenbomb
post Dec 19 2003, 05:30 PM
Post #2


Too skinny for medical research


Group: Moderators
Posts: 10,565
Joined: 23-February 02
From: Sic Transit Luminarium
Member No.: 1,428



Both the name and the look of the new building suck.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_TheZsaszHorsemen_*
post Dec 20 2003, 12:00 AM
Post #3





Guests






There is no reason this country should not have the world's tallest building.

That said, the design sucks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mole
post Dec 20 2003, 03:09 AM
Post #4


G-Men


Group: Members
Posts: 12,087
Joined: 12-February 02
Member No.: 620



Eww, are we in Oz? Is that smaller version of the Emerald City?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_NewYorkFox_*
post Dec 20 2003, 10:55 AM
Post #5





Guests






QUOTE(MrZsasz @ Dec 20 2003, 12:41 AM)
There is no reason this country should not have the world's tallest building.

Why? It's just a waste of money that they could be spending on me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravenbomb
post Dec 20 2003, 07:17 PM
Post #6


Too skinny for medical research


Group: Moderators
Posts: 10,565
Joined: 23-February 02
From: Sic Transit Luminarium
Member No.: 1,428



I agree. Spend the money on something else. Something useful.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Masked Man of My...
post Dec 21 2003, 12:10 AM
Post #7


Professional Otaku


Group: Members
Posts: 2,156
Joined: 14-September 03
Member No.: 4,057



yeah, like maybe trying to lower the deficit just a tad
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Masked Man of My...
post Dec 21 2003, 12:10 AM
Post #8


Professional Otaku


Group: Members
Posts: 2,156
Joined: 14-September 03
Member No.: 4,057



yeah, like maybe trying to lower the deficit just a tad
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Jimbo_*
post Dec 21 2003, 09:09 AM
Post #9





Guests






I suppose there's no way around it, but calling it the 'Freedom Tower' is annoying...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2GOLD
post Dec 21 2003, 10:11 AM
Post #10





Group: Members
Posts: 13,678
Joined: 23-September 03
Member No.: 4,115



We should have just built a smaller tower and left it empty. You know that building it going to be haunted out the rear.

I don't know, this design is horrible but it is NYC so it's kind of hard to say they are going to leave the spot open.

I'm still undecided on this.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EricMM
post Dec 21 2003, 01:04 PM
Post #11


Little Green Bastard


Group: Members
Posts: 6,708
Joined: 9-February 02
From: Greenbelt, MD
Member No.: 503



I like the wind turbines (IMG:http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Red Baron
post Dec 21 2003, 01:30 PM
Post #12


Screw Your Problem, I'm Talking About Me!


Group: Members
Posts: 11,547
Joined: 22-February 02
From: La Belle Province
Member No.: 1,389



sounds ghey
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_NewYorkFox_*
post Dec 21 2003, 08:35 PM
Post #13





Guests






QUOTE(Ravenbomb @ Dec 20 2003, 07:58 PM)
I agree. Spend the money on something else. Something useful.

Me?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ravenbomb
post Dec 21 2003, 10:58 PM
Post #14


Too skinny for medical research


Group: Moderators
Posts: 10,565
Joined: 23-February 02
From: Sic Transit Luminarium
Member No.: 1,428



no
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Bottled Black_*
post Dec 21 2003, 11:36 PM
Post #15





Guests






My question is where do they put the Big Red Bulls-eye? The worlds tallest building.. Come on thats just begging for another attack. Sometimes the stupidity of people astounds me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Jimbo_*
post Dec 21 2003, 11:47 PM
Post #16





Guests






An observation from a friend:

"Is it just me, or is including the height of the antennas for a building kinda like taking a toothpick and putting it at the end of your dick and saying 'hey, look how long my penis is!'"

(IMG:http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nighthawk
post Dec 21 2003, 11:50 PM
Post #17


Ninety Minutes of Gay Bashing


Group: Members
Posts: 8,388,607
Joined: 21-June 02
From: Bay Area
Member No.: 2,150



Once again, ya'll are some cold, cynical bastards. Now you're dissing a fuckin building.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Fast ReplyReply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 02:47 PM
Hosted by:

The McKenzie Group