Guest Rob Edwards Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Well SK seems to be suggesting that Taker has set the new mark for blading and after seeing him bleed in Brocks mouth (nice fight club homage) I have to provisionaly agree opending review of the Muta/Hase match just to make sure your thoughts?
Guest Brian Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Muta bled all over the ring, all over his opponent, all over the ref, and on some fans. Did Taker do that?
Guest eirejmcmahon Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Undertaker bled into his opponent. He was stuck in a bloody great big cage, so he couldn't really bleed on the ringside fans.
Guest Trivia247 Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 it certainly Put Sid's Blade job to Goldberg to shame.
Guest Agent of Oblivion Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 No. And anyone who has seen Muta's fountain of gore knows otherwise. He would've filled Hase to the brim if Hiro would've been laying there blown up with his mouth gaping open like a goof.
Guest HartFan86 Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Seeing Brock's mouth covered in Taker's blood was the sickest thing ever from a bladejob in N.A.
Guest Vitamin X Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Wow...If Taker was HIV positive, Brock would be fucked right now... Wait a minute... That does seem like a qutie awfully efficient way of holding down talent...And this is the Undertaker we're talking about....
Guest BionicRedneck Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Muta's was worse. Disgusting.
Guest Sturgis Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Does anyone have a pic of Taker bleeding, I didn't order No Mercy so I didn't see it, also does anyone have the Muta bleeding pic so I can compare the two?
Guest oldschoolwrestling Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 That was quite the bladejob. I wonder if it was an accident to bleed that much, or maybe since he's supposed to be taking time off they wanted him to appear more injured than normal.
Guest mach7 Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 There's this saying back home, it goes something like "Who gives a crap what Scott Keith thinks?!" Muta's was "worse" - or better.. depending on how you look at blading. Bleeding in Brock's mouth was nothing. It probably wasn't even on purpose.
Guest kindredone Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Muta's looked worse,but Takers was a great blade job. Hell,Heyman did a good blade also.
Guest The Amazing Rando Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 as long as everyone doesn't call him the MutaTaker...I don't care who's was better...
Guest Youth N Asia Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Muta's was more impressive. Since they're doing the soap opera deal Brock can say that he's suing the Taker for bleeding in his mouth...since Taker's been banging random hos for years now and no one knows where he'd been.
Guest Nevermortal Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 I haven't seen Taker's bladejob yet but I've seen Muta/Hase, and if Taker wasn't gushing blood all over his opponent, the ring, the ropes, the ref, the floor, etc he can not beat Muta, I mean hell, Muta's bladejob was fucking sick. Its like he carved a fucking poem in his head or something.
Guest MarvinisaLunatic Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Well, heres the super question of the moment: Micheal Cole: Taker was busted open so hard by the Champion Brock Lesnar that he had to have ____ stiches... How many stiches for the Undertaker? Im guessing by the sounds of it that there will be a lot of real stiches, but we all know the WWE fugdes their facts and figures, so Im guessing at least double the number that Taker really had to get.
Guest RenegadeX28 Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Man, that was like a gallon of blood that Taker bled. EVEN Heyman did a great blade job. That match was crazy..
Guest Pop Culture God Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Let me say this: Muta's was better, but UT's was AWESOME.
Guest The Amazing Rando Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Its like he carved a fucking poem in his head or something. who does Muta think he is....Jeff Hardy??!!
Guest Pop Culture God Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 That match was sick from top to bottom. SK jipped it. It's **** stars BAY-BEE! First, Paul E. brings Benoit and Angle on SD!, and now he brings the motherfucking carnage on the PPV. Why oh Why can't he book both shows?
Guest cynicalprofit Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 UT just turned around and his face was crimson...i still the better job title to muta justbecaue it wanst planned like this one probably ws and you kinda expected it here, being HIC and all. Brock would have become a great heel if he had licked takers blood off his fingers, nothing says heel better then sick and demented.
Guest Banky Posted October 21, 2002 Report Posted October 21, 2002 Does any of yous guys have pictures of the said blade jobs?
Guest The Old Me Posted October 22, 2002 Report Posted October 22, 2002 Taker's blade job last night was pretty sick. I haven't seen the Muta match in question in a while, but from what I remember, it would be pretty close with Muta's job beating Takers. But the blood was just rushing down Mark's face last night. It was impressive.
Guest EMAXSAUN Posted October 22, 2002 Report Posted October 22, 2002 yeah mutas was fucking disgusting, i mean, i have never seen blood flow like that, takers does come in second though
Guest Phoenix Fury Legdrop Posted October 22, 2002 Report Posted October 22, 2002 You have not seen a bladejob until you watch NWA Wildside Freedom Fight 2002 (review coming in 10 or so days on Smarktalk.com). The Rick Michaels bladejob puts both of those to shame. Within about fifteen seconds of it, he's covered in blood. He ends up covering the entire mat with it, the referee's shirt, his entire body, everything. Disgustingly brutal.
Guest Agent of Oblivion Posted October 22, 2002 Report Posted October 22, 2002 Was it a deathmatch, though? If so, I don't think it should count. That kind of match is pretty much completely based on the fact that's it's going to be a bloodbath, but Muta's was just a regular match, as far as I know. There's a difference in nicking yourself and painting the ring red and smashing your dome into a pane of glass and bleeding all over. Of course, I've never seen that Wildside match, so all of this might be for naught. As far as blading goes, I'll believe there's one worse than Muta's when I see it.
Guest tigerdrivah91 Posted October 22, 2002 Report Posted October 22, 2002 Ha Ha Takers blade job was ok... But compared to Muta and the REAL bladejob king Tomoaki Honma that was a no.3 at best. Until u have blood spewing out..not a little trickle it just aint close.
Guest Red Hot Thumbtack In The Eye Posted October 22, 2002 Report Posted October 22, 2002 New Jack ripping Mass Transit's head open is still the nastiest bleed i ever saw.
Guest AnnieEclectic Posted October 22, 2002 Report Posted October 22, 2002 ^ Agreed, but that's not technically a bladejob. I still get sick thinking of that match though. -Annie
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now