Jump to content

Some one explain to me...


Recommended Posts

Posted

I mean listen: People like the Radicalz and Y2J were leaving WCW in a flood because of backstage politics ruining the show, with old fogies who could rarely work held titles, where the midcard carried the shows despite being paid less, and everything else?

 

I'm getting the feeling that WWF just got lucky with 3:16 and was always just as bad, and certainly HHH learned well from Nash, Hogan, and Hall...

Guest bps "The Truth" 21
Posted

WWE was putting out a shitty product in 98 and 99 too...but Austin drew in spite of it.

 

2000 was an enigma because they pushed the actual workers for a change...and it worked.

 

Now is just a joke.

Guest Paranoid
Posted

And that's a bad thing? I loved WCW up until the last year or so.

Guest bps "The Truth" 21
Posted

Oh yeah? Then what happened?

 

...

 

...

 

oh right

 

I'd say that's a bad thing.

Guest Kahran Ramsus
Posted

The only difference is that in this case, the wrestlers have nowhere to jump to.

Guest alfdogg
Posted

It's different in that I enjoyed WCW MORE than the shit we have now.

Guest razazteca
Posted

well at least they (WWE) is not spitting of the credibility of the Japanese wrestlers.....oh wait a minute.

Posted
well at least they (WWE) is not spitting of the credibility of the Japanese wrestlers.....oh wait a minute.

 

Absolutely. I totally question Scott's motivation on TE. Maybe he can be the next Funa... I mean the next Taji... I mean the next Taka... Shit.

Guest razazteca
Posted

Shinobi's Back!

 

Scott can lose his 1st match by a bottle of Jose Cuervo

Guest ViciousFish
Posted

Is it just me or did Bischoff turn Raw into WCW just before it tanked but without cruiserweights? I mean, I thought everything was horrible, especially the focus on has beens who can barely carry their bags let alone a match? I mean he's brought back the WCW title, got rid of everything WWE, and even added a gimmick match that's based on a WCW idea. Maybe it wasn't just Bret Hart who had a stroke, but Vince as well.

Guest Paranoid
Posted
Is it just me or did Bischoff turn Raw into WCW just before it tanked but without cruiserweights? I mean, I thought everything was horrible, especially the focus on has beens who can barely carry their bags let alone a match? I mean he's brought back the WCW title, got rid of everything WWE, and even added a gimmick match that's based on a WCW idea. Maybe it wasn't just Bret Hart who had a stroke, but Vince as well.

Bish doesn't have any creative pull, the man gets dressed in the same room as the wrestlers. If you want to place blame put it on Vince.

Guest Mulatto Heat
Posted

They might as well change RAW to Nitro and Smackdown to Thunder to complete the change. Where's Schiavone at?

Guest Trivia247
Posted

in shape the product is...

the basic difference of WCW and WWE as it currently is...

IS that the WCW at the very least made a big deal of their cruiserweight division. While its been 3-4 Months since the Cruiserweight belt changed hands, or that the cruiserweight champion even competed in a match weekly more than a handful of matches in a 4 month space.

Guest AndrewTS
Posted
The only difference is that in this case, the wrestlers have nowhere to jump to.

That and one of our champions is fairly young (Big Show), and the other is (still) a great wrestler--even if he can't work a full schedule.

 

Other than that...no difference.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...