Guest Youth N Asia Posted January 8, 2003 Report Posted January 8, 2003 WHat the hell? Why can they show the older WWF logo in the retro Raw crap...but not the one they adopted a few years ago? They'll make an ugly blur of the more recient one...but not the oldschool on. This is killing my brain trying to make sense of it.
Guest Rob Edwards Posted January 8, 2003 Report Posted January 8, 2003 I think with the new one it's more apparent that there are two w's in it maybe thats it?
Guest geniusMoment Posted January 8, 2003 Report Posted January 8, 2003 Its because the wildlife people said the new logo to closely resembled their logo.
Guest Choken One Posted January 8, 2003 Report Posted January 8, 2003 The old school looks more like Panda Care WWF then the Attitude logo.
Guest Youth N Asia Posted January 8, 2003 Report Posted January 8, 2003 It's because the pandas are dumb. That makes the most sense out of this WWF mess
Guest bigdunn20 Posted January 8, 2003 Report Posted January 8, 2003 Because the WWF "scratch" logo apparantly defamed the World Wildlife Fund logo, while the 80's logo did not.
ChrisMWaters Posted January 8, 2003 Report Posted January 8, 2003 I just wish that the WWF stayed with the old block logo. Maybe then they'd still be WWF.
Guest AndrewTS Posted January 8, 2003 Report Posted January 8, 2003 Should have just gone back to the old block WWF logo. Or made a new logo. However, that would have made sense.
Guest Jobber of the Week Posted January 8, 2003 Report Posted January 8, 2003 I just wish that the WWF stayed with the old block logo. Maybe then they'd still be WWF. Nah. They didn't sue because the Attitude logo violated something the old logo didn't. They sued because, let's face it, they wanted some extra cash and this had always been a little sore spot with them. So they killed two birds with one stone. (And to the "It was Vince's fault" crowd: Yes, I know. But if the Attitude logo was really such a problem for the Panda people, they wouldn't have let it sit for four years before doing something about it.)
Guest Michael Joel Benoit Posted January 9, 2003 Report Posted January 9, 2003 The WWE current logo is so stupid. They couldn't even add an extra line under the 'F' to make it an E? WTF? They should have come up with a better logo than the one they have now.
Guest Eagan469 Posted January 9, 2003 Report Posted January 9, 2003 I never saw why they didn't just use the old WWF logo, and instead of saying WWF say "World Wrestling Federation" on TV. Pandas couldn't have sued over that.
Guest Brian Posted January 9, 2003 Report Posted January 9, 2003 The problem was they extended too much internationally, which was what the agreement was based on.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now