At Home

A resounding out.

That's why we devised a whole other plan for that. Just google Giethner. Also, watch the video that I posted up there a little while ago from the two guys at MSNBC. They want to take virtually of the risk out of the system. I wouldn't be surprised if we saw this again in six months. We should be doing those six months right now and actually having a stimulus package that stimulates our economy to make up the $2.9 trillion that it won't be producing. We're turning Japanese--our stimulus package is probably going to allow us to avoid the worst, but it's not stimulating like it should be. The package should have been bigger, 50% bigger. I certainly hope we don't have to see the Japanese reality, that it takes years and years and years to try to kick start the economy when the initial bolt was shot.

Bitch

I can say from personal experience that Hawaii's sovereignty movement is a) a joke, and b) unsupported by the state legislature.

MMA = The Poetry of William Wordsworth

So doesn't this happen today?

This is one of two editor's picks on the comments from Paul Krugman's latest article. Let's go back to protectionism and mercantilism!

Then I will put my mouth on his mouth

Gay = very attractive in a way that I can't explain

Tell me this 50-Ross thing

Jesus I really could not care less about this shit

I guess kind of old news, but the Senate version of the stimulus saves 12-15% fewer jobs than the House version. That would be 430,000-538,000 jobs.

When is the coup?

This was regarding the stimulus package, and I was very mad over the fact that Republicans cut out $86 billion that was badly needed in that bill, and she kept saying "it isn't over till its over." Turns out at that meeting, they cut out more.

It's a woman, by the way.

Not creating 600,000 jobs at a cost of over $140,000 per job? Wow, Im sure people will be crying a river over that one. Despite the fact that those 600,000 would've had a large impact on GDP, on top of the future planning components of the money cut out that would've critically help states to not go into the red, as well as benefitted education and all sorts of other miscellaneous projects to help drive up GDP? Yes, I'm sure there are a lot of people crying over that one. At least 600,000.

Just wait til people hear that the Republicans cost the economy 600,000 jobs because they wanted to cut out $86 billion in spending, a large portion of it to states. By that time, you would have resorted to cannibalism..AWW.

Yes

Let us not forget that many of the studies on unemployment and such in the FDR years, get ready for this, does not count those employed by the government as employed, they are counted as unemployed. The recession after WWI was not "probably" a post-war business cycle, it was a post-war business cycle after the crest, during the switch from a wartime to peacetime economy. Big understatement here. The farming sector collapsed.

You really have no idea. None at all.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/12/us/polit...tml?_r=1&hp It's $30 billion less this time.

Indeed

Intent, that's what I meant to say. Thanks. Anyways, I don't think it's clear enough to say that right now, and you'd certainly have to define what a person is at that point. It was meant as an abortion in the first place. I don't know how abortions work exactly, so I'd need to get that information before I could say anything.