nl5xsk1

The precedent that Bettman has set has shown that he doesn't give a fuck about how good of a hockey town it is (Winnipeg, Quebec, Minneapolis) ... I wouldn't be surprised if he moved the Penguins. How is that a good thing?!?

I personally would do nothing about it ... unless you're like 9 and worried that he might touch you in your bathing suit place.

Not all of us, VX ... Paris > Tara & Ashlee combined And last I heard, Lyonne was still alive but after the fit her old man threw over the media covering her illness (and the alleged violation of patient/doctor confidentiality) I would presume that the media's not covering her too tightly.

Agreed. And, Meat, I only meant the face paint. The other shit on their faces can stay.

Panda gang bang, obviously.

Saturday Games New England N.Y. Giants Denver Sunday/Monday Games Arizona Carolina Dallas Miami Pittsburgh Indianapolis Seattle San Francisco Cincinnati Cleveland St. Louis Chicago Baltimore Pats ... both boards ... 27 And I'm the big C in the rule change vote

Max, I agree with you that it's unfair to blame Sully for the way this season has gone ... he really was asked to make something out of nothing. But he's taken nothing and done NOTHING to make it better. I can't even count how many times (pre-trade, obviously) that there would be a never ending series of LW on the top line ... even if it meant breaking up 2nd or 3rd lines that were playing well. And I'm not talking over several games - I'm talking over the course of ONE game. It'd start with Isbister, and then when that wasn't magical it'd be PJ, then Green, then a rookie, then Isbister again. It doesn't take a genius to realize that a line needs some time to gel.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I could've sworn that the Rock's admitted to being a woman-beater/alcohol-abuser once or twice whilst he was a football player. I wouldn't be surprised if Rocky had done some shitty things while in school ... they don't call it Thug-U for nothing. But, I also have a little more 'understanding' (for lack of a better word) for someone making shitty decisions when they're a teenager or in their early 20s, compared to making shitty decisions when they're in their mid-to-late 30s or even 40s. I mean, I look back at some of the things I did to people back then ... let's just say that I wasn't the nice niskie that you all know now.

No offense to KC (and I agree that they got shafted in the past) ... but if KC gets a team before Quebec City or Winnipeg I think that I'll officially question Bettman's sanity. And, Max, I agree that it was a good one for the B's ... but I still have to wonder what team MOC is watching, and what games Sully is watching. The former I question because the players that he lost after last season are all playing better than the replacements that he picked up. Rolston & Knuble each have 26 pts, and Nylander has even more. Yet the new forwards (Scatchard, Isbister, McEachern, & Fitzgerald) would have a hard time reaching those totals COMBINED. Add in the pick-ups in the Thornton trade, and it's as if MOC's only goal is a team of 9 3rd liners and three legit forwards. The D that he lost (and I'm really only including the impact D-men like SOD & Gonchar) aren't necessarily lighting the league on fire ... but I'd take those two over Leetch & Tanabe any day of the year. And Sully ... let's just say that he's making me question his decisions more and more each night. Slegr is the leading defensive scorer (and will likely finish #2 on the team in points from a D-man behind Leetch) ... yet he's the guy that sits against the Wild to let the penalty-riddled rookie back in the lineup. Yet Gill, who couldn't stop my mother from getting a shot on net, hasn't been healthy scratched once. And on top of that, Zhamnov (the alleged #1 center) went 1 for 11 in the face-off circle ... wouldn't it make sense to, I don't know, use either Muzz or Samsonov to take the face-offs? Nah, we'll just keep losing face-offs instead. (I have to laugh at the fact that Joe's inability to win ONE face-off against NJ was referenced as part of the reason why he was traded ... yet the overpaid Russian stiff can lose 90% of his without it even being mentioned. Keep drinking that kool-aid, NESN.)

I wonder who was behind this wonderful quote. My guess is it's one of the guys that's gone uber-religious. Maybe Dibiase or something. I think that only the strong religious types are likely to compare VKM to Satan.

You're not versed on how the movie industry works, huh? If my memory serves, they've been trying to make this movie for like 5 years but decided to wait for approval/support from the real Special Olympics. They were delayed while searching out real SO athletes, and whatnot. South Park didn't have to care about getting approval or not, seeing as they weren't going to be including real SO participants to appear in their cartoon version.

Am I the only one that doesn't care what a wifebeating drunk finds 'disgusting' or not? Rock's opinion might carry some weight; Austin's does not.

Willing to get the titties done, Leena?

I will not see the movie because it takes a joke that can only carry about 5 minutes worth of jokes and stretches it out to a 90 minute film. Thanks, but no thanks.

At least the guys in the pic chave! posted are kind-of-punk ... compared to the winners at: Goth kids are teh lame 'course, I'd hit some of the girls if they wiped that shit off their faces

Ironically, I bet quite a few beastforum members would say, "Wow, they have wrestling forums?"

I think that threatening to no-show your own main event might be among the funniest things I've heard all year. What, exactly, would that accomplish?

The redneck bars that I occasionally frequented in Colorado were actually pretty chill about people puking. The fact that the floors weren't ornate or anything special, and thus could just be hosed off (literally) made them pretty relaxed about people throwing up in there. "Looking queer", though, was worthy of a threat or two.

The David Von Erich Memorial Cards were as blatant 'commercialism off of a death' as wrestling has ever seen. If those shows were your motivation, then, yes, I'd have to say that this would be in bad taste.

I'll preface this with stating, on the record, that I never have and never would actually get 'intimate' with a dog or any other animal. But I've always presumed that the dogs or horses have been raised to not mind it. And from what I've seen, the bestiality world is pretty against non-consensual sex, even when it's between two different species. They (rightfully) freak out if it seems that the animal isn't digging it. I've always just presumed that they started playing with the dog's poonanny or cock when it was a puppy, and thus the dog grew up to be comfortable with things happening down-there.

When I was younger I was more into the casino/cards scene. Blackjack was my favorite game, but I ended up getting pissed at people that would get pissed at me for not playing the right way (e.g. I know that you're supposed to 'stand' on certain cards while the dealer is holding certain cards ... but if I feel like it's more advantageous to get hit, I will ... excuse me for not playing like a robot and just standing/hitting without actually gambling at all). As it is now, I only go to casinos if I'm going to be in Vegas, since I'd rather play sports book or the horses than actual casino games.

I've personally never thrown up in a bar or club, but have had plenty of friends puke in bars. I've been pretty close once or twice, but managed to make it out the door before actually hurling. The worst one that I can remember was just a few years ago, and I was having a liquid dinner with friends in the financial district. Well, let's just say that too many Jack on the rocks on top of an empty stomach was a bad decision. The first hurling happened about 5 feet out of the front door, right in front of a bunch of people heading towards Faneuil Hall. The rest of the way home (taking the T from the green line to the red line, and then the red line all the way home) was broken up as I sprinted off the T to throw up in the garbage cans in the T stops. Not a fun night. Of all the times that I've seen people puke in bars, I've never seen anyone be allowed to stay OR have to clean it up. It's normally just a 'you're out of here' and then the barback (or someone comparable) cleans it up. And is my memory this bad ... I thought that the guido that threw up had to get escorted out of the club. Didn't he try to start a fight like 2 seconds after puking?

Of all the strange things they have at Beastforum, why pick the pic of a guy & a skunk to single out? I find the guys that use dildos on their pets, or the guys that actually perform cunnilingus on their dogs, to be weirder than just fingering a skunk. /former member of beastforum.

Matt, it's a marathon, not a sprint. Drink slower. But the faster you drink, the faster you get drunk. If I drink quickly, I get drunk off less beer. If you're drinking to get drunk, though, why drink beer? Liquor is quicker. And why would you be racing to get drunk? The journey is as much fun as the destination.

Oh, geez, you're right, Mole. Why should I even bother suffering through the skits without the lame intro's by Dave?!? It'd have been better if the show didn't come back at all.