nl5xsk1

I agree with Kotz ... it's not like his gimmick mocks the soldiers. Plus, I doubt that he was acting on his own. I wouldn't be surprised to hear that he was instructed to stay in character. Lastly, why WOULDN'T the wrestlers stay in character? They're there to entertain the soldiers.

Because the first guy is me and I wanted to see if anyone thought I was on the roids. As with the other guys I'm curious on to what others think particulary Steve Reeves. Not roids. Maybe *HGH. (*Homo Growth Hormone)

There goes the dreams of every poster that's dreamt of meeting you and having you fall in love with them, CC. <looks around> I'm not one of them, I swear. I'm on record as saying that you're too young for me.

You say the nicest things, Slayer.

It's just the loudmouths from New England are louder and mouthier than our Northeast Bros in obnoxiousness ... leading people to think that there's more than us.

That's the one silver lining to the Thornton trade - they played his "....... it's called Bruins" ad more than anyone else's. And the less I have to see that commercial, the better. /thinks of the new ones that they're probably filming right now, with Big Hal Gill <shudder> Question for you, Max ... when you see B's games on the hockey package, is it normally the NESN coverage or the other team?

Fuck Roenick. He better NOT be on the team. There's some older players that deserve to still be there, and some older players that don't. And JR is on the latter list. Oh, and the 'I'll be rooting against them on the TV coverage' is both a stupid threat and also a reason for NBC not to choose him. He did a shitty job the last time he did TV coverage, anyways. I'd rather they put Hull or <gasp> someone with actual TV experience in the booth.

Not if Buffalo really follows through on their threat to suspend Moulds for the game.

Just a quick bitch about my former favorite team ... good to see that trading the best player on your team only shakes the team up for 2 games. A great win over Ottawa, followed by a good, come-from-behind win over Edmonton, followed by two ugly losses by a combined score of 9-3. But at least that hood ornament Thornton is gone.

+1 for Darwinism.

I'm guessing that the network went with this game because it was a division game in what was presumably Favre's last season. They probably anticipated him & the Pack running wild on the Lions and thus they'd get 3 hours to wash his balls. Oh, and I'm also guessing that the satire posted as news might be the lamest thing I'll read all year.

Paris & the two pre-teens in Prussian Blue are the only racists that I like. Oh, and I thought the WP that you ended your post with was for "White Power" until I realized that you were responding to Pegasus.

Slightly edited to remove me from the mix ... you said "you're", which implied that I gave a shit. Johnny Damon could go 0 for the rest of his career and I'd still be completely apathetic about it/him/the Red Sox/baseball in general.

So, a company made a verbal agreement with an employee of a rival company, while said employee is still employed by said rival? Lawsuit hilarity to ensue. EDIT: Spelled ensue wrong

Wow, my e-nemesis has a history with JT the Brick. I feel like this is my brush with fame ... or something.

Leena, try dealing with him while being a Masshole. The guy's appearance at his nephew's Thanksgiving day football game made the news. He could rape children and people would still say "that pass against Miami was wicked pissah, though". Peyton's string of losing big games goes as far back as college. He's lost more big games than those other 4 put together. And it's rarely the RB that gets crap for losing a big game, so 3 of those 4 are kind of hard to compare to Manning. Lastly, QB rating is a joke. It pretty much rewards a QB for handing the ball off 70% of the time and throwing a majority of their passes as short, high-percentage passes. I'd rather have a QB with a lesser rating (but a better ability to single-handidly win a game) than a QB with a perfect rating even though his numbers are only 14 for 16 for 129 yards.

I tend to not like a team based on players as much as dislike a team based on players, if that makes sense. For example, the NY Giants are a team that I'm normally pretty apathetic about, but with Eli, Shockey and Strahan all there, I've grown to really dislike them these last few years. But there's not many random teams that I like purely for their players. I mean, I root for the Bears to do well, even though I really don't consider any of their players among my favorites ... I just naturally root for the team rather than against them.

Jeez, man, it's your 8th post and yet you've already busted out a funny line. Don't set the bar too high, we'll expect you to be funny all the time. EDIT: I just re-read this and it sounds like I'm being sarcastic. I'm really not.

Nope, AoO, you're on point with that. He dominated the CFL for a few years. After failing several times over in the NFL.

The "gun sticking out of the pants" tattoo is third on the effeminate tattoo list in my eyes. (just behind: around the belly button & the 'tramp stamp').

Maybe she was being sarcastic, but everything other than the projected record seems to be an on-point synopsis of Flutiemania. Fans go nuts when he wins a few games, and everyone trips over their dicks to say that he should be a starter. Then he blows a game and people make excuses for him, remembering the good but never the bad. But as a card-carrying member of the Flutie Haters Club, I have an obligation to point out how much he sucks whenever anyone -even facetiously- claims that he's any good.

Wear a white scientist coat. Or make a radio out of a coconut, like that guy on Gilligan's Island. Either charade should fool your drug peddling colleague.

And if you don't like the smell, have someone make up some butter, make some brownies and eat it and THEN play the horn.

That's not really how it works. A kick-ass episode wouldn't cause an immediate bump in the ratings (unless people are calling their friends and saying, "hey, you have to watch Raw, it's awesome tonight"). A kick-ass episode sparks ratings to rise in the following weeks. People were tuning in because of the "will Bisch be fired, and who will replace him?" curiousity. Having said that, though, people must have been entertained to keep the rating at the 'high' number that it was. If the show sucked ass, people would have turned away.

No, there are words: 4 to be precise. "Fuck that. I quit."