Damaramu

Have a nice(short) stay here.

Yeah, but they can still talk about it badly and hurt the BCS more. Cause the #1 not being in the title game is not setting well with any of them right now. I'm not even sure if I care about LSU vs Oklahoma now. I didn't like either of them to begin with and the game isn't even involving #1. But what nobody has been able to tell me is this. Why is the human #1 the undisputed #1? Why? Why aren't people going "Well those humans got it wrong. USC isn't #1!" Why are the human polls considered so great and what they say goes? I mean a human is prone to more bias and hidden agenda's than a computer. So why? Is it because it's traditionally how it's done? Is this a no change kind of thing?

Penn State didn't even start playing football until 1887. Well then who were the first two to have that game? Dammit.........*looks it up* Ah-ha! November 6, 1869 at New Brunswick, New Jersey. Princeton vs. Rutgers. The first college football game.

Well then let's all hope for a change. Yes that is wrong that they don't get a chance to go. But I think it's also weak how people from smaller conferences don't get a chance. Miami of Ohio could've gone out and shut out everyone they face beat every Top 10 team and they probably still wouldn't have made it into the Title game. That definetly needs to be changed. There is a conference bias in the computer and in the humans and that needs to be changed. I could have told you that years ago. Not only a conference bias, but an overall school bias. The computer doesn't fact in IF you beat the team ahead of you, according to the computer that is not important. That is how FSU got in over Miami despite Miami beating them. And how Nebraska got in despite losing to Colorado. The computer is flawed just as bad as the writers. It will never be settled. I'll just say congrats to USC and whoever on being National Champions and be done with it. Cause that is all this reject system allows for. The only way that it will be done is if they create a playoff system and start it way earlier in the year. That will kill all controversy. But that won't happen because then they'll have to elminate bowls. And if they keep bowls around then there will be a problem because nobody will care about those bowls because they aren't in the playoffs. That's why it won't happen. Greedy rich guys.

Once again...the Coaches aren't going to be able to vote for UCS as #1. The #1 position is already filled in for them.

Your mom. - Deranged Hermit, not your mom. I'm gonna take it this is a big joke since nobody can actually come up with a reason why he is godly. No you wont. Well nobody can provide a reason why he's so godly so I'm guessing it's a sarcastic joke.

Well when I was creating a team it made me choose my play style, yeah that was it style, and the worse I picked the lower prestige I got. So I have to have a bad style to start with a prestige I can build up?

Well then let's all hope for a change. Yes that is wrong that they don't get a chance to go. But I think it's also weak how people from smaller conferences don't get a chance. Miami of Ohio could've gone out and shut out everyone they face beat every Top 10 team and they probably still wouldn't have made it into the Title game. That definetly needs to be changed. There is a conference bias in the computer and in the humans and that needs to be changed.

Your mom. - Deranged Hermit, not your mom. I'm gonna take it this is a big joke since nobody can actually come up with a reason why he is godly.

Hmm....it looks like the better playbook you choose the better prestige you get. I want to build a team from the bottom and give them prestige......but that means i have to pick a crappy playbook..........

Yeah I like football but I really latched on b/c of school support. Because I go to OU. But this was the way my parents, die hard NFL fans put it. "This is just to complicated. There are to many outside factors and to many people that decide. It needs to be left up to humans or computers. You can't let both decide because they're going to disagree and then we're going to have what we have now. Course the computer can't hurl childish insults." I thought college football originally just started as a game between Penn State...and someone else? And then it started growing. Were they calling themselves the national champions after that game?

Thank you very much for continually baiting me. You're something else now. Ok...this is what I'm going to say. OU,LSU, and USC are all about equal. Whoever wins their games deserves to be National Champions. USC won and they deserve there half of the title. And I've noticed that none of the coaches are bitching about having to share the title. Why? Because they don't care. They've won a title. They've all said "I know the system is flawed, but it's the system we agreed upon. There's nothing I can do about it. I just have to play for my piece." And that's true. There's nothing we can do about it. It's going to happen so I guess we all have to sit back and watch it play out. And whoever wins the Sugar Bowl, if they play like they did this year and USC plays like they did this year then I can gurantee those 2 teams will meet one another next year in the national title game. And it'll probably be the undisputed National Title game. Someone is going undefeated next year. And it'll probably be USC, OU, our LSU. One of those 3. Or even 2 of those 3. If all 3 do it......oh god even more hell.

Hmmm.........but USC didn't even play a conference title. The conference title argument will not hold water until every conference has one. Thank you and goodnight. This is hopeless. You guys are like an unreasonable brick wall.

God. Can't you just stop this? This is the kind of shit that causes flame wars and bannings. I can't even argue with you guys anymore. I think I'm right and you think you're right. There is no changing one another's mind's obviously. I sent APO a PM. Hopefully he'll close this before it gets out of hand. Goodnight.

I told you. If you'd pay attention rather than just finding different ways to bait me you'd know. I said if OU loses to LSU then I will admit that they were the #3 team this season and that they were overrated. But you probably won't let me leave it at that. Me: Well I guess OU just isnt' as good as everyone though. USC and LSU were better. You: HAHAHA! TAKE THAT FUCKER! OU LOST! YOU SUCK! YOUR TEAM SUCKS! FUCK YOU ASSHOLE! HAHAHAAHAHAH! See it's useless because you're going to do something like that no matter what. And Bored. Yes....USC does deserve a piece of that national title. A piece. They are very deserving of that title...but only half of it.

That's the general attitude I get here. Yes OU got blown out. But by a top ranked team. While USC lost to an unranked team. If we aren't taking margin of victory into account, which you guys don't want to do when you look at the rest of the season......OU is the better team. The season still backs me up. So is anyone going to answer me seriously or just make stupid posts?

No it looks at the entire season. Which is a good thing. It doesn't unfairly penalize a team over one loss. I remember the week before the KSU game it was "OU is so good! They've got to be one of the best ever!" then they lose "OH MY GOD! THAT'S GOT TO BE THE WORST COLLEGE FOOTBALL TEAM EVER!"

See. You can't come up with anything. Anything at all. So you have to come up with that. That's what your problem is. You get beaten so you just start making stupid insults and posts. Good job. I'm still waiting for that reason that you can't seem to produce because there isn't one. And I'm still waiting for you to look at OU's entire season and tell me that if they had been playing there best that game would've ended the same way. Come on.....do it.

Ok. You guys lost and now all you can come up with is this shit. Good job. Make yourself out to look like a dumbass. I used to think you were a pretty smart guy BPS. I liked your WWE folder posts. But now.....you're acting like an idiot. Nobody can still look at the season and come up with anything. That's all I'm asking. Why can't any of you do it?

WHY WON'T YOU LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE!? WHAT IS SO HARD ABOUT THAT!?

How about you quit acting like an ass and actually discuss this properly? You're a mod. Act like one.

And I'm saying to pull your head out of your ass and look at the entire season and you'd realize that that game was a fluke! Tell me. Based on OU's performance all season you can't honestly believe that K-State is such a better team than OU! That on OU's best day they'd still get raped by K-State!? NO YOU CAN'T! And if you try you are lying out your ass. LOOK AT THE FUCKING BIG PICTURE!

Hmm.........there is still no basis aside from that one game as to why USC is better than OU. The who's better between LSU and OU will be decided this weekend. But still. There's no logical reason why USC is better than OU if you look at the entire season. Please. Put that game aside. Look at the season and tell me why USC was better. And if you say "THEY LOST BY 28 POINTS!" then you are still dancing around the issue and basically admitting that you're wrong because you have no proof.

Reason appears to be a foreign concept to you guys........and so does logic.......because if you think about this reasonably and logically you will see my point. But you can't seem to. All you can think is "I hate OU. I was waiting for them to slip up and they did. Now they're the worst team in history." Sorry it doesn't work that way. Based on the season they're the best team in college football. The numbers and the actual games played back me up. You can continue to talk to me but I know I'm right.

Fact is that's all you guys have. "They lost to K-State." and like I've said. That's weak. Because OU's season proves that the game was an aberration. And if it'd happened at any other time OU would've stomped them into the field. You don't go from being one of the best teams ever to losing 35-7 because the 15th ranked team is better. That doesn't happen. It was a fluke. That's all there is to it. Now come on...where's that proof from the season. Look at the big picture. You're afraid to look at the big picture b/c you know you'll be wrong. You'll see that OU played better than USC and LSU.