Damaramu

Umm....where the hell was my match? Ok before I comment on the show 2 things: -I didn't attack Crystal backstage before the show. I injured her on HD~! this past week. Remember that whole angle where everyone came out to save her and I was cuffed and drug to my dressing room? -Where was my match? I sent it to Zack who said he sent it in for me. Then Joseph said he had my stuff in....yet my match was nowhere to be found on the show! To say I'm a little upset is an understatement. That was a damn good match and I was looking forward to my PPV debut....damn.........

He saved the board....or something.

So are we having a show or not?

So are we having a show or not?

There's a difference between being a drooling idiot and having the decision-making ability of an adult. Not to mention the fact that children are more easily influenced than adults (obviously). There's really no point to this debate if you're dead-set on one point of it and refuse to offer anything else to back up your view on the issue- I'm open to seeing some kind of study that refutes my arguement. You, on the other hand, seem stuck on this one point of the issue (your own personal experiences). Nothing I can do then. -Duo The only thing I can offer is my own personal experience which I KNOW IS RIGHT. I know what I felt and I know what was right and what was wrong. If my dad had given me a gun and said "Shoot that police officer" when I was 7 I would've said no. That is how I know I'm right.

Okay. But my point is that you don't have any actual proof other than your old word here, while I have studies to back me up. In any decent debate, I would win. Show me a study that refutes the curret standard I'm going on, if you want to make a serious debate out of this. Saying "well, I know how I was at 7 and my cousin is at 5" doesn't prove anything. -Duo It does to me. I know exactly what I'm like. I'm sorry if you were a drooling idiot when you were 7 and didn't know what the hell was going on and couldn't reason until you were 12. I apologize you were like that. But I know what I was like. Therefore I am right because I know from my own personal experience. To say "Well this scientist says you weren't" is just asinine. It's like the people that say "We know what's good for you. You don't." I know what I am thinking and feeling and I know what I have thought and have felt. And nobody is going to tell me otherwise. So give up...you are not going to win.

Uh, did you miss the "I would have killed the kid." jokes? Wasn't talking about Anglesault, was talking about: "I would have shot him in the head. If he had a gun then he knew how to use it and now that he's been shot in the foot he'll want to shed blood even more" -FrigidSoul "Wow, shooting a kid in the foot -- that's some marksmanship. Wonder how Al Jazeera would have covered the story if the soldiers smoked the little bastard, which is what they should have done..."-kkk Those were the two I was talking about, both happening before my post. I was saying that all the "the kid should have died" jokes were idiotic, hence why I went with a semi-sarcastic flame. Somehow, that got turned into a serious debate. /shrug -Duo He is lucky he wasn't killed. That soldier there had some restraint seems how most of them are trained to shoot to kill.

Right, so I guess you're just smarter than the US justice system and all the scientists who have ever presented research to the contrary, right? -Duo Well gee...I wonder why my 5 year old cousin can reason? I didn't say I was smarter. I said that I know that my cousin can reason and I know that when I was in the fucking 3rd grade I could reason. If you're trying to tell me that I couldn't and I'm wrong about myself then you're full of it. So then explain to me why there's studies to the contrary and why the US justice system believes it. You're just saying the same thing over and over again without actually answering my question. -Duo I'm going in circles because what I'm saying is true. I don't care what the justice system is I know what I was like and I know what my cousin is like. That's why I keep saying it. You can't buy the fact that what you found may *shock* be flawed.

Right, so I guess you're just smarter than the US justice system and all the scientists who have ever presented research to the contrary, right? -Duo Well gee...I wonder why my 5 year old cousin can reason? I didn't say I was smarter. I said that I know that my cousin can reason and I know that when I was in the fucking 3rd grade I could reason. If you're trying to tell me that I couldn't and I'm wrong about myself then you're full of it.

I wasn't getting morally high and mighty- that would be called sarcasm. It's seemingly fine when people use it on me, right, but when I reply with it, that makes me "condescending". Hello, double standard. -Duo Yes please tell us about the double standard hypocrite.

Didn't say I was mad, just said he insulted. If he's trying to prove a point (and in turn trying to prove that I'm wrong), flaming isn't exactly the best way to go about it, is it? Originally I was not trying to prove any point.....just express my disgust with all the "the kid should have died" posts, which is why I flamed. And once again- there's a reason why kids under 14 aren't tried as adults for murder, because there's scientific evidence that they aren't going to know the full consequences of their actions. It doesn't fly in the face of common sense to assume that a seven-year-old doesn't have the mental capacity to choose whether or not to kill on the same level as a 14-year-old- this is, indeed, common sense. No. Because I just told you I remember when I was 7. And I have a 5 year old cousin that is perfectly aware of what is going on. A 7 year old knows perfectly well what will happen if he's given a gun and told to shoot someone unless he's just a blithering idiot.

Don't get morally high and mighty on us. This is the reason nobody is listening to you. You're a condescending little hypcorite. Your posts smack of "I'm superior to you in every way."

Yes yes he can. If I gave my 5 year old cousin a gun and said "shoot that guy" he'd know what I was telling him to do. If I was 7 in the 3rd grade mind you and told to shoot someone...I'd know exactly what's going on. Your supposed "research" pretty much flies in the face of common sense here. Oh and don't get mad at someone for the blatant insulting. You were the first one to flame in this thread...when you called everyone dickheads in your first post. Don't be a hypocrite.

Well...once we destroy KSU then he will be cool. Apparently all my posts about KSU here fell on deaf ears Yes...yes they did.

Well...once we destroy KSU then he will be cool.

Did Poppick die or something?

Ok fuck the Angleslayer for President stuff....Angleslayer for God in 2K4!

Of course, I'm looking at this from an American POV, so certain TV and movies and whatnot might give me a leg up, but damnit, at age seven, (2nd grade) I damn sure knew the idea behind a gun. According to simple biology, a seven-year-old cannot possibly comprehend the consequences of what he's doing. This is why, in my mind, he doesn't deserve to die. That was what I was saying. -Duo Yes they can. I don't know where you took biology at but your teacher is a retard. A 7 year old can reason and can comprehend. My fucking 5 year old cousin knows what happens when you shoot a gun at someone and he can reason and function normally. Tack 2 years onto that. So you're telling me a fucking second or third grader is an oblivious twit that has no idea what's going on? No. Then can function and reason just like anyone else. I'm pretty sure the child knew what he was doing with a fucking gun. Like I said...if he was 3 or so then you'd have a case. But he's a 7 year old.

*points as banky and then at himself....gives Frigid quizzical look*

*looks around.....gets bored and leaves*

Yes I'm pretty sure a 7 year old knows what the hell a gun is and how to use it. Dammit he's not a 3 year old. A 7 year old has a perfectly functioning brain and the ability to reason. Yeah I was in the 3rd grade when I was 7...but I couldn't reason or figure anything out so I flunked out.

It was the match that totally destroyed any interest in the world title feud. Does that refresh your memory? The one where Benoit/Brock went over for absolutely no reason...with Benoit getting a tap out to the crossface from one of Team Angle? When it should've been Angle getting the tapout from Brock with the Ankle Lock?

They don't have game cards out yet. So for now you need a Credit or Bank Card. I have a Bank Card so it works the same.

When were you ever quoted in my sig?

Handicap matches don't generally help anyone. The one guy wins. He just buried his opponents because 1 man beat both(or 3) of them. If the side with 2(or 3) men win...big fucking deal..you just beat 1 guy. You should've been able to. The worst offender I think of this was Angle vs. WGTT/Big Show. He pretty much embarassed all 3 of them. It was sad.