CheesalaIsGood

We should blow it up. Right after we get rid of that pesky MOON!

The replys so far have pretty funny. You don't tell a MAN what is and is NOT a masculine trait muthafucka! Don't know where DA got that this was a fishing trip in the article, but whatever. This has been the sort of thing we libs have been saying about conservative men for a long time now. So true. So very fucking true.

I'll summarize the article: Bush good. Liberals bad. Civil libertarians suck. The End. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks. Saved me a bunch of time. Kotz: You can forget trying to talk your way out of being an apologist. Its not gonna happen. If you are on the left, you support terrorists. Just ask any conservative they will tell you "just how it is". It sucks I know, but thats what we are dealing with. People who are just as unreasonable as the fucks who want to kill us. As far as I'm concerned people like me are just caught in the middle. Speaking of apologies. There is no good reason to not start trials for the dolts down in Gitmo. But apparently living up to our own standards is much too much to ask. WMDs? I guess Scott Ritter was right afterall.

I never saw anything but Free Fall, but this has been a great read. Thanks for posting.

I'm the worst poster here. Just ask anybody.

Soft on crime? Wasn't the guy that was shot innocent?

Condy is very funny here. "We NEEEEEEED leadership at the UN (that we hate and don't support). Whhhhhy are you taking soooo long!" This is sort of like all those callers on the talk shows: "Weeeee won the election!!! WHY aren't weeeee winning???" Quit crying. Maybe the rest of the world would like to send somebody who is a diplomat! Rather than somebody who is just going to walk in with a report of the place the Bush Admin is dropping the next set of bombs. We could have somebody who negotiates with EVERYBODYS best interests in mind! Wowzers! Is he a liar? Well look who he runs with. Jebus!

. Hillary is polarizing figure to most which is her weakness. Unfortunately even after all the posing and sliding to the center, she still is a card carrying member of the same Democrat fringe that bows to the foil-hatted, socialist, Marxist ideals that are championed by the current DNC chair. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> G.W. is a polarizing figure as well and he still managed. I think my foil hat is quite stylish.

Ooooh boy that comment with the rich people not having any kids serving in Iraq... buurrrrrrrrn!

DBS had a couple of good matches with Haku on Primetime back in the day when he came back with the braids. They had some good chemistry.

I got really into the one on the 64. Beat it, loved it. The Cube one kinda blows tho so if this new one is more of the same I don't think I'll get it.

Indeed, thats what I heard on the news the other day while laughing at conservative talk shows.

If you have any left over can I have them?

When he licks the dead body at the land fill. UGH! God that movie gave me a headache. I'll be buying it soon.

Methinks the writer would get more respect if he wrote editorials and didn't use a cartoon duck that isn't funny. And I'm sick of conservatives who act like they're underdogs when they control all three branches of goverment. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I couldn't agree more.

To anybody that might think that the ECW PPV was a failure I might want to point out something. You can comapre the two buy rates all you want, but people actually DO see that ONS was a legit ECW show. Nobody disputes this. THAT is a success nobody thought would happen. Vengence could have pulled Wrestlemania numbers and still not tarnished the shine. The fact that it was genuine under the WWE umbrella was so awesome on so many levels.

I have to agree with above. I haven't bought a TNA show since before they went on Fox. If Jarrett is all over the place I'll puke. Too bad about Matt Hardy. TNA had a chance to be part of something cool. So they get tonight to win me back. If not they can fuck off.

really good stuff from these two. i agree that the crowd was kinda quiet but they were watching Velocity! a crowd never knows what its getting from a show like that so they tend to sit on their hands while waiting for Smackdown. really this should have been on SD.

Meanwhile, thanks to the latest schedule change, the Family Guy reruns on Adult Swim airing against the Daily Show are a hundred times funnier than Jon Stewart has ever been. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Which goes to show that nobody is funny when they are hurting your feelings. Awww.

Is he anygood? Those clips somebody posted here awhile back showed that the guy had alot of potential.

http://savemanny.blogspot.com/2005/07/gran...-sex-scene.html This is a link to the GTA sex video that was supposedly put in the PC version.

I also gotta wonder about that Burchell guy. Anyone know what he is doing?

That comeback was about as strong as saying "OH YEAH??? SO!!" What a fag. Fuck Mallard Filmore. Its just a Mother Goose and Grimm wannabe. Least artwork wise.

Not to worry. The republicans will pull out our troops just in time for the 2006 election. Cuz you know... they really do believe in making this work. It's not a ploy for votes. Nope, not one bit.

By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer Thu Jun 23,10:38 AM ET WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that local governments may seize people's homes and businesses — even against their will — for private economic development. ADVERTISEMENT It was a decision fraught with huge implications for a country with many areas, particularly the rapidly growing urban and suburban areas, facing countervailing pressures of development and property ownership rights. The 5-4 ruling represented a defeat for some Connecticut residents whose homes are slated for destruction to make room for an office complex. They argued that cities have no right to take their land except for projects with a clear public use, such as roads or schools, or to revitalize blighted areas. As a result, cities now have wide power to bulldoze residences for projects such as shopping malls and hotel complexes in order to generate tax revenue. Local officials, not federal judges, know best in deciding whether a development project will benefit the community, justices said. "The city has carefully formulated an economic development that it believes will provide appreciable benefits to the community, including — but by no means limited to — new jobs and increased tax revenue," Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority. He was joined by Justice Anthony Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer. At issue was the scope of the Fifth Amendment, which allows governments to take private property through eminent domain if the land is for "public use." Susette Kelo and several other homeowners in a working-class neighborhood in New London, Conn., filed suit after city officials announced plans to raze their homes for a riverfront hotel, health club and offices. New London officials countered that the private development plans served a public purpose of boosting economic growth that outweighed the homeowners' property rights, even if the area wasn't blighted. http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/a...zing_property_2 Booooooy, what a crock of shit. If you OWN property, you OWN it. What the fuck? Do they even get paid for the land?