Art Sandusky

Any time I've heard someone say it that way they sounded like an idiot. And by that, I mean the one guy I've ever heard say it like that was a dumb, smelly git that no one liked.

She's not dumb, she just knows that she's going to be bulletproof due to her wealth and last name. Paris just doesn't give a fuck.

Are you kidding?

W-ell, I can't speak for everyone, but what I'm most into is intellectual would-be actors from the South. So...I mean, if you know anyone like that.... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

No, and that kind of safest-possible-route rationale is what's lead the average American to dismiss all the candidates as the same shit in different suits.

Any candidate with actual convictions would use the opportunity to destroy Robertson and the false moral pillars upon which he rests his hatred, then immediately refund the appearance fee.

I like thinking that bad posters are, in real life, as easy to dispose of as a dog that keeps bugging you. Problem is that I can't think of what I'd have to throw into traffic to get rid of each one of you eyesores.

The 2008 Chevrolet Suburban, with class-leading cargo and towing capability.

Im not quite sure what ive done to offend you. You're serious. You do make your own posts right? I have a hard time believing that suddenly, starting with this post, someone else took over the "luke-o" account at TSM after kicking the ass of the other guy, whoever it was before. All I know is the guy fucked big women and looked like one of the Make-A-Wish kids whose wheelchairs you want to push over. Oh yeah, and he defended TNA endlessly. And not only did he royally blow in just about every arena of discussion, but he popped up all over the place while totally oblivious to what he was doing to his fellow posters. Objection sustained. But you might be cool, new guy. The first two thousand or so posts have almost rendered me sterile.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/05/04/...main/index.html Our guys are starting to get weeiiird.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/05/03/hat...bill/index.html I'm surprised the defense isn't "of course it's a hate crime! You must really hate a guy to beat his ass or kill him!"

I like when people argue your analogy more than your actual point.

We really should put hate crimes in the same category as pedophilia, which is to say that it should have lists of offenders and everything. Both involve non-specific targets and hate crimes are just as bad as pedophilia in terms of the person executing it because of a deep mental problem. Much as a family with kids might not want to move to an area near one or more sexual predators, a family of a certain race or lifestyle would probably want to make sure they weren't moving two doors down from someone who was convicted of killing a family full of "muds."

Ha, people think this poll should have had meaning. I almost made it a one choice poll with "Hoff, KOAB, Chave, and luke-o" getting 100% automatically.

If you're Tom Brady, the last thing you want to do in the West Village is wear a Red Sox cap. A Yankee hat blends in better, and I doubt he wanted to be noticed especially after they knocked the Jets out of the playoffs this year.

I worry about defense being left up to hired armies from for-profit organizations. Loads of prisons are already privately run as it is. Big government is good in some areas, y'know.

It's a lot easier to make a case than you think. The mind-boggling decision to keep everyone where they were for a couple of hours after the first incident could be called into question if you really wanted to. The only end for that I can think of is general fearmongering. Any other time people can do this, but in the case of conspiracy theories you'll never find anyone who's willing to put themselves in someone else's shoes to ponder the how or why of it. EDIT: I found this - http://www.cruel.com/topic/294743/real-kil...hind-vt-killing Just throwing it out there, I'm not going to say anything one way or another. Now that we know this idea exists, we have a purpose for the thread. EDIT 2: Looks like my guess at what a cover-up would accomplish was right.

Who the hell are you?

5. Rob Van Dam. 4. Bobby Heenan. 3. Hulk Hogan. 2. Mick Foley. 1. New Jack.

It's actually 7.32% right now. Even worse!

Why has luke-o only garnered 7.34% of the vote?

Regardless of any real evidence that can be found to support the idea of any of those fields having actual conspiracies, you will be shouted down here. Sadly, the only people who believe "crazy talk" are either "crazy" themselves, or are immediately placed into that group of people. I blame mass media and an overabundance of trust on the part of most citizens.

Oh, I almost forgot but remembered upon seeing an advertisment on SpeedChannel: The idea of a few powerful teams of drivers/cars is pretty much how racing is done on the professional, global exposure level. It's not part of NASCAR's ruination. If nothing else, it keeps the circuit grounded in auto racing still. If they cease having owners of the cars and just have "NASCAR drivers," it will truly be dead. I wish this was flippant conjecture, but the idea of the organization pretty much building the cars they use and charging teams/automakers with the cost of one is another case of the true factory-backed STOCK CAR racing aspects and benefits of participation dropping to almost nil.

Alyanna means "write-in vote" in Romansch.