dubq

I felt the same way with that, and when they did it with Chloe as well. Fucking pansies.

I belive it's in the same forum.. http://www.ewbattleground.com/

It's not a fake. That Hogan/Michaels SummerSlam 2005 banner has been on the wall of the OVW Arena the past year. Just shows you how rarely they change that stuff. i see im still skeptical that anyone can lose that much muscle mass in that short of a time. He's been gone since mid-May, I think. That's about three months. It could happen. By the way, you're not seeing the full scope of what he's lost in that picture due to the angle. Clearly he's smaller, but it's not like he's suddenly Spike Dudley. If anything, he's more on the level of the former La Resistance members.

Wierd that they picked him instead of Alan Ritchson (who played Aquaman in Smallville). Either way, I heard it was a total bomb of a show.

The press release talks about Lex's character as if he is still Lex and not Zod.

What the FUCK is with this Ana Clavell and James Glenn Dudelson and their shite attempts to ride the coat tails of George Romero's previous works? First Day of the Dead 2, and now this garbage. FOAD has never been more apropos.

Have you tried Ryland's Wrestling Spirit sim? It guides the career of a wrestler (instead of plyaing the promoter). I'm going to check out the demo soon.

Totally. Back then I got most, if not all, of my info from the RSPW news group mailing list.

Who were you before Carlito Brigante? PS - stop boasting about weed on the internets.

FYI to Canadian viewers, if you haven't already caught the majority of it via clips on the net/youtube, the show is also on 12AM tonight on Global TV affiliates.

Not to mention when he does talk, and says "REBEL" or whatever - with his drawl and pre-pubescent'ish voice I can't help but laugh and cringe at the same time.

That's hilarious! The sound of the tiolet actually scares the hell out of my cat, thank fuck.

So why does he like HBK? For the same reason he keeps Brawler and Patterson around. I don't think Patterson is actually employed by the company anymore, is he?

Getting off the roids tends to do that to you. Fuck that, even off the roids he shouldnt be THIS small looking. Looks like a completely different person altogether, are we positive this is even him? Otherwise, the word was that Masters wasnt suspended for roid testing at all, and it was for another drug issue. At the alarming rate he lost weight here, makes me wonder if it was meth or something. Seriously. Well, consdering it's an OVW shot.. and considering he's wearing (what look like) Master's trunks.. I'd wager that it is Masters - even the profile of his face looks exactly like him. He does look smaller, but I think the angle of the photo is contributing to him looking even smaller than he actually is in that photo.

Looks like it. But if by some odd stretch it turns out to be legit - I'll have to agree with SB.

Animated comedies like Harvey Birdman, Futurama, etc. are also great.

That first pic is some of the fakest shit I've ever seen...

Anyone else noticing some fuck-ups on the actual disc? At scene 7 (and every so often after that) I'll get these little milisecond hiccups that look like scanlines. Anyone else experiencing this?

When I reference recreational drug use, I'm talking about marijuana. Not cocaine. Not E. Not opium... and so-on. When I reference recreational drug use, I'm not talking about it being used every day. Once a week, at most (same thing as someone who goes to the bar for pints on the weekend). Overuse of anything can have negative side effects. What about people who drink diet soda? All of that aspartame can result in memory loss, insomnia, migraines and so-on. Those idiots! Again. Not boasting (at least I'm not). Boasting is the act or an instance of bragging. I don't see anyone in here bragging about their experiences as if they were better than everyone else. Maybe it's a stress reliever. Perhaps they do like the taste - regardless of if it's smoked (I know lots of people who smoke the occasional cigar for the taste) or consumed. What does it matter to you? What I'm getting at here is that you have no right to make these assumptions. You have no right to claim that just because someone might smoke a bowl after a stressful week at work (or for whatever reason they choose), that they're an idiot.

First off, I believe that the only person proving themself to be an idiot is yourself. You can't even get your sentences arranged in such a way that they support your "argument" or "point" or whatever it is you're grasping at. Ie... As for boasting? Wrong. Apparently you don't know the context in which to use this word - so please, stop using it. What reason does there need to be? Perhaps the reason that someone uses marijuana (recreationally) is in the same column as someone who has a glass of wine or two with their dinner. It doesn't have to have anything to do with "having a good time." Just because other people can endulge in it responsibly is no reason for you to go around calling them idiots. The only idiot in these parts, at the moment, is yourself and the high-horse that you just can't seem to get off of.

"Everybody who uses recreational drugs is an idiot." "Especially the ones in this thread." --- "Also, boasting about drug use on the internet is particularly retarded, as proved by the posters in this thread." That's having a discussion? Sounds a lil like trolling/flamebaiting to me. If you can't take the responses you're going to get, then just fuck right off. PS -

)--> QUOTE( @ Aug 15 2006, 01:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That is a very subjective statement. Eating a pot brownie is just one way to have a good time. I have many other outlets available for a "good time" that don't involve recreational drugs. You, however, obviously don't since you're spending so much time getting bent out of shape over what other people do with their time, bodies/brains, lives. Which maybe sugests I was making a subjective statement as opposed to a generalisation, eh? Using "people" sounds like a pretty broad generalization to me. If you were making a subjective statement (on purpose) then you should've said "most people" or "some people" or even "certain people" - but you didn't, so you still fail on all accounts.

Thanks Chave. You know, since we all care so much about what you think, I was really looking for your approval on that one.

)--> QUOTE( @ Aug 15 2006, 12:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Also, boasting about drug use on the internet is particularly retarded, as proved by the posters in this thread.