teke184

New Mexico- Bush up by 30,000 with 99% reporting. Iowa- Bush up by 10,000 with 98% reporting. Wisconsin- Kerry up by 18,000 with 92% reporting Michigan- Kerry up 90,000 with 80% remaining. Nevada- Bush declared winner by USA Today 51-48.

Bye, Gabe... Don't forget to write.

Gabe, if you're going to act like a whiny bitch, I have absolutely NO objections to restricting you to posting in the Whiny Bitch Forum. This is beyond logic and has now degenerated into childing namecalling and denial. If you can argue your case LOGICALLY, you can stay. If you do the "he's not my president" bit again, you're going on a trip.

99% reporting in New Mexico and STILL no calls for Bush winning the state... Everyone must be scared shitless of putting Bush over 269 EVs.

More news- Wisconsin is only for Kerry by a margin of about 10,000-15,000 votes. Wisconsin + Iowa + New Mexico or Nevada = 21 EVs... which counteracts a theoretical Bush loss in Ohio.

And yet NO ONE has called New Mexico yet.

I'll say it: You're a sensationalist Plain and Simple. -=Gabe I'll say it... You're a partisan asshole. . And? And you cut off the important part of the message... Barring 150,000 Kerry votes showing up and no Bush votes to counteract them, Kerry LOST Ohio and you're trying to argue otherwise.

Yeah... called for Kerry around midnight or so. Tight race there.

I'll say it: You're a sensationalist Plain and Simple. -=Gabe I'll say it... You're a partisan asshole. Bush, barring the appearance of 200,000 *legal* provisional ballots that break for Kerry at a 75-25 rate, won Ohio and, thus, the election.

Let's see... Leaving Ohio completely out of it, you still have a Bush lead of 30,000 in New Mexico (4), a Bush lead of about 10,000 in Nevada (5), and a Bush lead of about 15,000 in Iowa (7). That makes 16 EVs. If Bush picks up Hawaii, which has only released results from one precinct so far, then Ohio doesn't matter.

New Mexico has 93% of precincts reporting and a 30,000 Bush lead but there are still no calls.

Michigan called for Kerry

oh did I mention.... ? 97% counted in Ohio and Kerry's STILL behind by 130,000. Face it... he is NOT winning it without a court case and, even then, people won't put up with the same shit that happened in Florida.

That decision was tossed out last night... If a provisional ballot wasn't cast at the right polling place, it's invalid.

A lot of the commentators are bringing out the "Nixon conceded in 1960 with closer margins than this" argument. I wonder how much it stings whenever a Democrat is told they have less integrity than Richard Nixon...

It's too close to call because there's still 25% of the precincts left. However, I still think that Kerry will pick up the state by a few points.

What, abortion? 1) There is no right to it. 2) Bush has not begun to even propose it. Mike is right because Abortion itself is not a right... it's an extension of the Right To Privacy. The Right To Privacy isn't actual, either, as it's justified by taking bits and pieces of several Constitutional Amendments and throwing them into decisions by Warren Berger and Earl Warren Supreme Courts of the 60s and 70s.

Serious damage considering that he doesn't have the "moral authority" Gore did because Gore at least had the popular vote... Kerry has 47-48% compared to Bush's 51-52%.

Bush is up by 35,000 in New Mexico with 93% reporting, but no one will call the state. I think everyone's gunshy of possible lawsuits for denigrating Kerry's presidential ambitions.

Bush has finally taken a lead in Nevada. He's up by 1500 with 49% of all precincts reporting.

No, they wouldn't vote a Democrat black man into the presidency... Colin Powell or Condoleeza Rice would be likely to pull Republican support and possibly get crossover support if people would stop the "Uncle Tom" and "House n!gger" shit they've subjected the two of them to for being Republicans instead of Democrats.

Bush is up 11,000 in Iowa with 94% reporting. Every time I refresh it, Bush's lead grows by a few thousand.

Jesus... MORE people who can't get out of the goddamn 1960s... These people don't seem to realize that they caused the schizm within the Democratic party in 1968 which ended up giving the entire South to the Republicans.

Overturning Roe Vs. Wade? That'll be a stretch in the next 4 years. Most of the SC justices that are in danger of retirement or dying are of the conservative-leaning side, either centrists (O'Connor) or further right (Rehnquist). The only left-leaning justice I could see dying anytime soon is John Paul Stevens just because he's about 85. Even then, he's not as leftist as any of the Clinton appointees.

A centrist like McCain, Rudy, or George Pataki would have a serious shot in 2008... ESPECIALLY since the extreme left wing of the Dems has made noises about pulling the party further to the left, win or lose in 2004.