Rob E Dangerously

Mike would file that under 'violence'. He said that the NAACP is not as violent as the Klan. But he never actually proved that the NAACP was as racist as the KKK either.

Holy Father, I'm pleased to meet you Right back at ya, my son

For the sake of reference: So, the Klan, a group which feels that African-Americans are inferior, is just as racist as the NAACP, a group when you claim dislikes black people if they are conservative. Or, in other words.. the NAACP is racist against African-Americans So, the NAACP isn't as racist as the KKK, or are they? are they racist and doing it to make money, or are they not racist and using it to make money. I'm sure your original statement is the one you're standing by.

Apparently, The NAACP is racist because they don't like Conservatives.. And apparently, when you said the NAACP is just as racist as the KKK, you meant 'against black people'. I guess that means I don't have to worry about a group of NAACP members harassing me for being white. Request A: Can you present any proof of their racism? Request B: Can you show they are just as racist as the KKK? And i'll amend your statement a bit..

And the last thing that you think of when it comes to Pope Zell I is "youth"

Prove the claim Mike. None of this "Well, it happened, I swear, it's your fault for missing it" BS. Prove it. Anybody can make up a lot of bullshit and say "Well, you must have missed it" when asked to prove it. Now.. since Mike tells us that the NAACP is as racist as the KKK. Let's look at what the KKK has to offer when it comes to racism (and, since Mike as "as racist as the KKK was", we can presume we have a more mellow Klan now) (random thought: Isn't it odd that while the KKK claims to be part of a superior race, they have crappy design on their websites?) Let's go to the 1920s: http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/f...owers/Klan.html http://www.kkk.bz/abolish.htm http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAkkk.htm So.. the NAACP believes that people in other races are inferior compared to them? So what i've heard about the NAACP letting anybody in is untrue.. I'm sure Mike knows the answers here!

I congratulate Zell Miller on his election to be Pope.. wait a minute.. that's not Zell Miller It's.. DAS POPE As a half-German and a non-Catholic.. I say.. it's about damned time we had a German Pope. I won't hold the Hitler Youth thing against him, since they made him join.

No, there REALLY aren't. It's a NATURAL phenomenon that was exploited by "scientists" shooting for grants. So, there aren't Ozone Holes, but there are Natural Ozone Holes? Where have the other ozone holes been? The "ozone hole" was allegedly caused by human activity. It's not. It happened for YEARS. -=Mike So, there really is an Ozone Hole? But you denied it earlier. Where else have we seen natural ozone holes?

Prove that claim Mike. (i'm sure the NAACP has all sorts of stuff just as a racist as the Klan. I'll have to check for some stuff like that when I get home at 2)

wait until the recount is over

Classic Klan-related quote from Mike source Good thing Robert Byrd isn't a member of the NAACP, or Mike would have had to bash him for that too, since the NAACP is just as bad as the KKK.

No, there REALLY aren't. It's a NATURAL phenomenon that was exploited by "scientists" shooting for grants. So, there aren't Ozone Holes, but there are Natural Ozone Holes? Where have the other ozone holes been?

If there was a legitimate Middle Eastern tie to OKC, wouldn't it have been mentioned by somebody in the Government sometime in the last 3 years? Just saying

http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsu...cs/11336323.htm A modern day hero for us all..

Don't fuck with me, bitches http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005171819,00.html

The concept of not holding a really bad move against somebody forever seems lost on you. You, of course, know that it's easy to rescue somebody after driving your car off of a bridge. Yes, we should put all the people who accidentally kill others and join racist groups, and put them in a tower. That'll show them. Actually, I think a DeLay-run PAC paid the 500K to DeLay's family members or something of that sort. So, is "ever" a very strong word to you? Every stereotype of yours, of course. But, I don't really go though life caring about what you think either.

It's amusing what qualifies as accurate and slanted to you. Wasn't the conflicting evidence on her wishes along the lines of "She wouldn't want it, she's Catholic" (Parents) v. "She told us she didn't want to be that way" (Schiavos). The Parents claim on her intentions doesn't seem like quite enough to be evidence.

I'm pretty sure DeLay was the one who had relatives who recieved 500K from one of his PACs. Admirable jump to conclusions there though. Since i'm not joining a pitchforked mob that jumps to conclusions, I guess that's bad. Robert Byrd made a mistake when he was in the Klan back in the 1940s. Ted Kennedy made a mistake at Chappaquidick. Mike's response if he were angrier: "BUT.. YOU MUST KICK THEM ALL OUT!!!!!!!!!!!" I guess when it comes to some people, there's no such thing as forgiveness for sins and mistakes.

Somehow, I doubt that. When we were good friends, I didn't come close to getting some, I don't think that would suddenly change if I did bunny disposal. She realized her latest ex was cheating on her, so I'd imagine she's probably slightly unstable anyways. Anyways, her house was 20 minutes away and it was 1am.

And two of the questions in the Zogby poll were: “If a disabled person is not terminally ill, not in a coma, and not being kept alive on life support, and they have no written directive, should or should they not be denied food and water.” "When there is conflicting evidence on whether or not a patient would want to be on a feeding tube, should elected officials order that a feeding tube be removed or should they order that it remain in place.” When in doubt, pass the buck

I'm pretty sure the only verdict you'd ever accept in that case is guilty. Jumping to conclusions is not something which is a good idea, especially on something like this. I doubt there'd be enough evidence to convict him anywhere. First off, it's been over 30 years. Second, there'd have to be a provable account of his actions from someone who was in that area. Or, to put it another way "Kennedy's big evil lawyers would use their powers to get him off" (random note: the most that I'd imagine Kennedy being tried for is manslaughter. But, i'm sure it's fair to lump in anybody suspected of that with first degree murderers and such. That's what counts. ) At least it's nice to know you set such high standards for your Republican politicians, with the "no racism/no killing" thing

Well.. to be honest about her. She's a bit crazy in her own way. It's totally believeable that she would freak out over that. But, i'm not going to let her make me feel sorry for not driving to her house and picking up a dead bunny. Slight backstory: We became friends last year, after awhile, she mentioned that she didn't want a relationship, I think I sorta moved towards that after that, she ignored me, went into a relationship with her third ex. Now we sorta talk, although there's still stuff that is probably off limits. And she's somehow decided that riding in the car with me driving would be scary, based off of maybe a comment or two I made. Considering what she did to me, I don't think refusing to pick up a bunny head is that bad

Ok.. we have a backstory! (from her journal dealie)

Bunny Heads ruin fun

Obviously you don't get Mel Martinez's memos. (especially regarding going after Bill Nelson over this in 2006)