Rob E Dangerously

so...... when I am not paying attention, some guy calls another guy posing as a girl a 'cunt' and he gets banned. Then the girl who was a guy makes hundreds of posts but the people in conflict with her never connect 'Tiffani' to 'Zack' and now Eagan, who appears to be unable to spell is raging against people. Aye.. I wonder if I can get a banner like IDRM or Banky. Or something.

HIAC would be worth it if Nash wins the title in 8 seconds

The difference between Jason and the dumb kids and Nash and HHH. Nash doesn't kill HHH

I wanna see if they go though with 'Cow Tipping'

I know who I'm rooting for in the Steiner/Test blowoff match. Go Test! Make her your horror!

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...aq_pages_of_war Ooooook....

Here we go.. Sierra- Years in Major League Baseball: 20 (signed with the Rangers in November 1982 at the age of 17) Debut: June 1986 First hit: 3-run Home Run off Charlie Liebrant of the Kansas City Royals (source: Retrosheet) Years on a MLB team: 18 He has been involved in a trade five times He has been traded for Jose Canseco (1992), Danny Tartabull (1995) and Cecil Fielder (1996) Career HR number: 279 Number of home runs hit by the three sluggers he was traded for: 1,043 (462/319/262) # of teams that he has played for: 10 (Rangers, As, Yankees, Tigers, Reds, Blue Jays, White Sox, Mets, Indians, Mariners) From June 1993 to June 2003 he has played for 10 teams # of stints he has had with the Rangers: 3 (86-92, 2000-2001, 2003) Ruben's age if the Yankees go to the 2003 World Series: 38 # of games in the playoffs for Ruben: 11 (5 in New York in 1995, 6 in Oakland in 1992) ----- that's the skinny of the matter here.

If an English language version is put out, will the FBI still swoop down on us if we got some copies as a 'fiction' book.

Source image: http://mx.news1.yimg.com/mx.yahoo.com/p//0...oli54652400.jpg and we get this..

Oooooooh yeah

Torre better start getting numbers for GMs so he can get a new job soon. Steinbrenner is going to fire him. Zimmer = gone, Cashman = gone, Torre = gone.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/03/sports/b...&partner=GOOGLE George Steinbrenner is still nervous. The Yankees had a shabby victory in Detroit on Sunday, and Steinbrenner, their principal owner, does not like the coming schedule. Interleague play is here, with the Yankees visiting the Cincinnati Reds and the Chicago Cubs. That makes Steinbrenner edgy. The Yankees are 4-1 since losing on Memorial Day, when Steinbrenner criticized the team. He is not sure his words had an impact, but they might have, and for that Steinbrenner is happy. But the Yankees still need to play well, he said, because the odds are against them. "All they needed was just a little jolt," Steinbrenner said yesterday in a telephone interview. "Whether they got a jolt or not, I don't know. But they dug down deep yesterday after playing miserably in the first part of the game. We don't blow 7-1 leads, but I think we settled down. I just hope we play well against the National League clubs. I don't think the schedule is fair." Steinbrenner pointed out last week that the Boston Red Sox, his team's main rival, play road games in Pittsburgh and Milwaukee this week, while the Yankees play two better teams. Yesterday, he was sharply critical of Major League Baseball for the scheduling. "Katy Feeney makes the schedule, and she has never been a favorite of mine or a favorite of the Yankees," Steinbrenner said. "We play Cincinnati, which is a fine, fine ball club; they're going to be in the middle of it. Then we play the Cubs. "Now who is the other guy playing? They're playing against Milwaukee. Now what's right about that? They're playing Pittsburgh and Milwaukee while we're playing Cincinnati and the Cubs. I think they got the best of that deal. "Bud Selig told me personally that he was overseeing the schedule, and that he'll see to it that it's fine. I used to be for it, but I'm not for it anymore. It's too easy for discrepancies." Feeney, a Major League Baseball vice president, said the interleague schedules were made a year and a half ago. She said that with the five-team American League East playing the six-team N.L. Central, and with the Yankees playing two series with the Mets, it was impossible for each A.L. East team to play each N.L. Central team. The Yankees will play the Pirates and the Brewers in 2005, she said. "I can assure you, I do not, and the other schedule contractors certainly do not, purposefully think, 'How can we make life more difficult for the Yankees?' " Feeney said. Other George news: He probably won't fire Zimmer, yet. It was his idea to let Conteras start and he pitched great (against the Tigers though) And he'll probably resign David Wells in 2004. Jurassic Yankees baby!

Here we go with the article http://www.canoe.ca/EdmontonNews/es.es-06-06-0059.html Arghhhhh... let me pick this apart. "U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said yesterday the transition to a democratic government in Iraq can't be rushed - and cited the rise of German dictator Adolf Hitler as an example of what could go wrong." Yes, a government could have a madman who will murder tens of millions come up if rushed. I can also die if my microwave explodes. I don't know the betting line on murderous genocidal madmen coming into power in Iraq, but I'd imagine lightning just won't strike twice. "Rumsfeld said he wasn't and the transition from dictatorship to representative government is difficult." Well.. of course. I just wanted to note that. It is quite difficult to get people out to vote in a Democracy in an area which has never had any form of Democratic government. ""If you think about it, Adolf Hitler was elected. So elections are not the certain judge."" Rummy.. you fool. HITLER WAS NOT ELECTED. The Nazi Party never recieved a majority of the vote, even after the Reichstag fire. Your own historical ignorance has inadvertantly put you with the dumbasses who say "Hitler was elected, Bush wasn't" and all that. Hitler lost the Presidental election in 1932. He was then appointed Chancellor, and on the death of the President, he consolidated power. He was NOT ELECTED. ""You don't want to have (an) election one time and then a dictator and go right back to some dictator model"" yes, the dictator model is not one that Iraq should go to. Hopefully they won't go to the 'repeating bullshit' model either, like you did with your Hitler comparison. Sorry Rumster

Hopefully Tank and Kimo won't get into a 69 either

Thank you Jesus for enabling me with the ability to beat the life out of my opponent!

Pedro: "What kind of racist bullcrap is that Johnson?" *unleashes the fastball*

http://www.timesdaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar...8/APA/305280576 Experts in Islamic law are being called to testify in the lawsuit of a Muslim woman fighting a state order to take off her veil for her driver's license photo. Sultanna Freeman, 35, says Florida's insistence on photographing her face violates her religious rights. "I don't unveil ... because it would be disobeying my Lord," Freeman testified Tuesday at the start of her non-jury trial. Assistant Attorney General Jason Vail argued that having an easily identifiable photo on a driver's license is a matter of public safety. "It's the primary method of identification in Florida and the nation," Vail said. "I don't think there can be any doubt there is a public safety interest." Freeman's attorneys argue that state officials didn't care that she wore a veil in her Florida driver's license photo until after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, an allegation the state denies. "This is about religious liberty. It's about whether this country is going to have religious diversity," said Howard Marks, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida. Hey.. just a few questions for you. #1: How the fuck do you drive in a black veil? #2: if you said you don't drive in a veil, then why should you get your license photo in one? #3: If you're already wearing a huge veil, then why are you driving? You wouldn't drive if you were really that devoted. You'd have a husband and you'd be at home. #4: If you are going to drive unveiled, then how will people be able to ID you if your license is of you in a veil? #5: If you claim you are sincere to Islam, then why do you insult your god by driving? If he told you to put on that veil, what the fuck makes you think he wants you to drive a car? #6: Are you recieving funding from Saudi-based or American-based Islamic groups for pressing this lawsuit? #7: If you're able to get your photo in a veil, then I should be able to get my license photo taken in an Adam Sandler mask, I can say it's my damn religion, and if you can do it, so can I. Right? Ugh.. what a stupid bitch (no offense)

So, will Batista feud with Evolution on his return?

Absolutely. I'm no real fan of the current Iranian government either, with them building nuclear stuff and denying it. There could be enough dissent in the country to bring them down. ------- Meanwhile, in other news. Iran claims they think Iraq had WMDs I'm sure that will confuse most Americans on both sides. Leftists will wonder if Iran's lying to justify war, or a CIA tool, or if Newsmax is just lying about what the Ayatollah's gov't said. People on the right will still mention how Iran is bad, or "they're so bad, but they know when we're right" or whichever. Best bet: Iran still really really dislikes Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi government

Really? How have you reached that conclusion? The Taliban themselves were welcomed to take over Afghanistan. The people wanted them to. As Tyler said, the majority of people would vote for them. So why wouldn't they just let the people elect them? I'll leave it up to Tyler to cite any polls that show a majority of Iraqis want a Taliban-esque or a Shiite Islamic Republic. I'm sincerely puzzled here, do you think we went to war to win popularity contests in the future? It'd be nice if we'd win a popularity contest in the country we just liberated. You think they'd be favorable and like us. Yeah.. good point. Although, if a lasting peace involved taking down the Iranian state, then you'd be for it, right? I wouldn't mind seeing their state fall by whatever means work.

Yes, a Democracy, unless they vote for the Shiites, then we'll have to clarify Democracy to mean "Vote for anybody except the guys who want to expell the US from your country" Sure.. we want at least more than one or two elections before the thing goes up in flames. Or preferably a stable country. Spicy, do you think it says about US involvement in Iraq if Iraqis vote people into power who resolve to expell our troops from the country? Just a scenario. But, Iraqis will probably feel gratefulness to us, unless we somehow wear out our welcome with them.

Can't blame the guy, he is a Dominican player like Sammy Sosa. Sorta like standing up for your brutha or whatever. Although he is much more bitter.

oooooh... it's the holy Marney, out to save the day! You're not even sure if you can call it a Democratic appointment or an election. Let me spell it out for you, No, he was not. The Nazi Party never even won a majority (37% in July 32, 33% in November 32, 43% in March 33). But, if under the rules of the Weimar Republic, he was democratically elected, then of course it was a cruel turn since we know what he thought of Democracy. A few points to make with that. One, a Talibanesque dictator party will probably seek other ways to take power than Democratically. Second, a Shiite Iranian-sympathizing government could get a plurality, but something tells me they may not get a majority. But, that's dependant on what process is approved for the new government, either it be a congress/President, a Parliment/Prime Minister/President or what. What does that say about our popularity in Iraq if you think they'll vote for people who want to kick us out of Iraq? While I think the insane side of parties in Iraq is either exaggerated or can be contained, it'll probably be the best if the first few governments are ones that we can get along with. Can you name the Democratic governments in those countries? You can't because they never had any. It's not like all these countries have been taken over by the Psycho Talibanesque religious types. Hell, going thru that it's Islamic state, King, Emir, King, Emir, King, King, Dictator, Occupied by Syria. I'd take Iraq being a kingdom over the nightmare scenario of an Islamic Republic. Yes, a Democracy, unless they vote for the Shiites, then we'll have to clarify Democracy to mean "Vote for anybody except the guys who want to expell the US from your country" Yeah, that'd be an ideal way to set up Iraq. Balance of power and all. Considering they have three groups (Kurds, Sunnis, Shiites) who would probably kill each other if it gets really bad. So, are you going for Democracy in Iraq or a Republic in Iraq? I'll take 'Democratic Republic' as an answer, since you'd annul elections faster than the Turkish military if some psychos somehow got a majority of the vote. Meanwhile, Iraqi elections aren't exactly flowing smoothly (or happening at all yet) It appears that mass apathy and mass accusations of corruption are hurting them in Um Qasr.

Bonds likely wouldn't do an interview with Reilly and he got mad. All these journalist care about is what benefits them. Bonds not doing an interview is very plausible. Imagine if Reilly was around for Ty Cobb. He'd wish for Sammy Sosa then.

Reilly sounds a bit pissy. Granted, maybe the fact that McGwire is white and Sosa is a black player from the Dominican Republic and Bonds is black has a small influence on Reilly. But, I don't think that's anything legitimate. As for Canseco whining about Racism. Look at the guy, he may have lived in Cuba for nine months, but the guy doesn't really obviously seem like a minority. Although with Jose, he is finding out that pissing off people and being a DH who only hits HRs will limit your job oppertunities. Jose gives disservice to all people legitimately hindered by racism thru his whining. Unless he can produce some evidence that white players break their corked bats and never recieve punishment, then he is an assclown