Rob E Dangerously

Ric Flair's going to heidenreich Randy Orton

Ric Flair still fucks virgins? creeepy

Flair will pop Randy Orton's cherry!

unless Snitsky gives Kane the Snitsky Slam off of the stage

Gene Snitsky killed Kane's baby, and now he'll kill Kane!

http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/002932.html

Were people staying married in unhappy situations back in the 50s, or do people just get divorced at random now? Was the low divorce rate a sign that there were tons of happy marriages? Part of the reason for high divorce rates should be obvious.. people are impulsive and they have poor luck at picking someone else who they can grow old with. Instead, they pick someone based more on looks or money, not on compatibility.

and I guess you can't show me how the previous samples were an accurate depiction of reality. and up 4 among likely voters. Which is more realistic? (hint: not the one that has your guy up more) http://people-press.org/reports/tables/227.pdf And somehow.. their polls went from 48-40 Bush to 48-41 Bush while Bush lost support on Independent voters (from 46 to 42) and Democrats (from 10 to 9 percent) while keeping support from Republicans (90 percent). Bush only stood his ground with one party, lost ground with the Democrats and with Independent voters, and remained at 48% but here's the Pew methodology: http://people-press.org/reports/methodology.php3

Are you going to answer the question or not? for the skeptical types: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselect...29-gop-poll.htm

Care to provide proof that the following party ID samples are an accurate depiction of America? 43% Republicans, 31% Democrats, 25% Independents 40% Republicans, 33% Democrats, 27% Independents those were the samples for the 9/13-9/15 and 9/24-9/26 Gallup polls The 9/24-9/26 poll's sample percentage of Republicans is only outdone by the March 26-28 poll (which sampled 44% Republicans and that was 51-47 Bush) So.. is America 43% Republican?

Unless someone was able to remotely scramble an earpiece in that place.. which is sorta unlikely.. then I doubt Bush had an earpiece.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,134268,00.html Who is Communists for Kerry? http://www.hellgate.org/disclaimer/ There's probably a coordinated effort to make jackasses of the major media, and that's not too bad. BTW.. Fox isn't fooled by Billionaires for Bush

Gallup is.. interesting they also had Gore down by 13 points in late October and Kerry just covered a 13 point Gallup deficit

"Multilateral is the best option" equals "China will end the talks if we do anything else" in your world. Does this messenger have anything more than a press release that they can use as proof of their claim? Does his messenger have ties to Bush? Would someone tied to Bush have any possible reason to bash Kerry? I guess since every messenger has credibility, it's time to find as many crazy slimeballs as possible to claim stuff about Bush. And also, James Carville too. And then people will attack them, instead of their "true until proven otherwise" claims. http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/05/11/teresa.kerry/ http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/release...2004_0511b.html she could.. then you'd find something else that you'd want released, and so on, and so on somewhere in this timeframe, you might realize that John and Teresa file seperate returns. But, that's unlikely

Drudge is as credible as the NYT.

So.. because they say the 6 nation talks are the best means that they won't do anything else. That's convincing. Considering that the quotes I mentioned claimed the bilateral would be a second forum. But.. with proof like that.. damn.. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4734048/ Mike.. when you're taking stuff from the ATR site.. you could always mention it.. http://www.atr.org/pressreleases/2004/pr-k...axes-9-7-04.htm hmm.. nothing tells me that Grover Norquist could be biased or possibly wrong. Nothing... at... all... Why would Grover lie?

Even you're saying it was at the least, barely a win. Knowing your partisan and biased nature, that probably means that Kerry did win.

Pursuing bilateral talks with N. Korea, which China has made more than abundantly clear that they do not like --- but, hey, as long as they're not French or German, ignoring them is peachy. via Time, http://www.time.com/time/election2004/arti...09071-2,00.html : http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6161107/site/newsweek/ http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticl...47&section=news Considering how prevalently summits and the UN were a part of his answers --- yup. "I have a plan to have a summit with all of the allies, something this president has not yet achieved, not yet been able to do to bring people to the table. " "I'm going to hold that summit. I will bring fresh credibility, a new start, and we will get the job done right." "But this president hasn't even held the kind of statesman-like summits that pull people together and get them to invest in those states. In fact, he's done the opposite. He pushed them away." it's so obvious.. And the summit requirement is covered.. since the Arab Nations are having a summit, and there's a summit for people who want to donate stuff to something. Therefore, we don't need to have any new summits at all, because we're obviously having summits right now. The President gets $400K a year Senators get $158,100 a year When it comes to that income.. obviously Bush will pay more taxes. And Kerry's wealth was manily though inheritence. Such as the trusts of his mother. That wouldn't be covered under the income tax. I'd imagine that it was taxed under the inheritence tax (which I'm pretty sure Kerry isn't in favor of reducing). I'd be interested to see if John Kerry is raking in the dough from anything else. Remember: Kerry did not combine his wealth with Teresa on their marriage. Kerry, who would roll back the tax cut for those making over 200K (including himself, especially under the Presidential salary) is bad Bush, who is doing the opposite, is good.

John Kerry had a shiny object on his sleeve, which distracted George W. Bush

"It's Hard Work"

"We butchered the Democrats present at the debate. We have taken a huge lead! Whenever we attack, they retreat. When we pound them with our substance, they retreat even deeper. But when we stopped pounding, they made up a poll for propaganda purposes! The Democrats are committing suicide by the hundreds on the gates of Washington. Be assured, our lead is safe, protected" "[Kerry]'s melting down. When he loses, you'll point to this also." - Mike, 8/21/04 "[Kerry]'s losing support quickly and it's only getting uglier. His campaign is progeressively looking less and less serious." - Mike, 9/9/04 "Somebody linked to intentionally planting stories to turn an election they're losing BADLY is worse than somebody covering up a 3rd rate burglary." - Mike, 9/21/04 "The Dems are simply working their ass off to explain why their guy tanked so royally in an election they mistakenly felt was in the bag." - Mike 9/21/04 "Blaming Gallup because Kerry is tanking is sad" - Mike, 9/29/04 "Kerry is STILL sucking eggs --- but a runaway election isn't fun for the news, so they want to make a competition where one does not exist." - Mike, 10/2/04 "Kerry is still going down. Hard. Hell, Bush still leads in the states." - Mike, 10/3/04 -- as for the policies. One would be Iran. The other would be.. I'd imagine that the Iranian denial doesn't mean that the talk of "He'd give them nukes" would stop" as for the ammo.. yeah.. picking out one sentence and ignoring the rest of the statement is ammoriffic. I guess your countrymen means "I will cede all power to the UN and the French" although it is interesting that Bush is concerned about how Kerry would be able to pay for stuff that would go to homeland security. Since it's more vital to keep a tax cut on the richest Americans than to help enhance the security of this nation

Blaming Gallup when Bush is tanking is sad.

Kerry had a neuron gun which made the President incoherant. And he wore lifts in his shoes.

The Royals will be restructing their strength and conditioning staff for 2005 BTW.. going into the game today, they had 10 players who were injured

BYU