

Rob E Dangerously
Members-
Content count
5862 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by Rob E Dangerously
-
I'm now taking bets on a Miller v. Carter duel
Rob E Dangerously replied to Rob E Dangerously's topic in Current Events
Please don't hurt me Senator Miller! I'll protect you Coach Holtz! We have nothing better to do, we'll fight Zell Miller! BTW, the origins of the Clemson/South Carolina rivalry are.. interesting.. I'm sure every Southern state at one time had a governor who had a vendetta against the state university. -
I'm now taking bets on a Miller v. Carter duel
Rob E Dangerously replied to Rob E Dangerously's topic in Current Events
Bah, if you're a Clemson resident rooting for the Cocks, it simply shows ya got taste. -=Mike And it shows that you're not discouraged easily either. -
I'm now taking bets on a Miller v. Carter duel
Rob E Dangerously replied to Rob E Dangerously's topic in Current Events
What Zell Miller is doing is sorta like if you're a Clemson resident and you go out to cheer for the Gamecocks. A lot of American party loyalty is similar to sporting teams. What Carter claimed was that he was "Disloyal to the Democratic Party", not "Disloyal to America". But, Zell dresses better than he did back in the day. -
It's not hard to believe that it's really really tough to hurt the Pentagon. Is there a specific reason why all this Pentagon .swf stuff is coming out now?
-
I'm now taking bets on a Miller v. Carter duel
Rob E Dangerously replied to Rob E Dangerously's topic in Current Events
I think he means "Disloyalty to the Democratic party" There are still "Yellow Dog Democrats" out there -
Dick Cheney brings the optimistic campaign
Rob E Dangerously replied to Rob E Dangerously's topic in Current Events
Well.. will voting for Kerry appease the terrorists who will attack us if we vote for Kerry? I need answers -
Kerry under investigation for possible medal fraud
Rob E Dangerously replied to a topic in Current Events
Is there a good abbrieviation for "Larry Klayman Sues Everybody"? -
I wish some people could be a bit more subtle. "You've just got to separate out fact from fiction.... too often, in this country, if you hear something repeated, repeated, repeated, you start to believe it, and we've seen it used in this country and other countries around the world"
-
On the bill Kerry supported: "the bill makes a specific provision for this kind of gun, since they are very popular among hunters, and the bill seeks to limit the sale of assault semi-automatic shotguns (that often have two pistol grips)." the bill: http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?...8:@@@L&summ2=m& "Modifies the exemptions from the Brady Act's prohibition against manufacturing, transferring, or possessing a semiautomatic assault weapon to exclude: (1) specified firearms, or replicas or duplicates, as manufactured on October 1, 1993; (2) any semiautomatic rifle that cannot accept a detachable magazine that holds more than five rounds; and (3) any semiautomatic shotgun that cannot hold more than five rounds in a fixed or detachable magazine." and here's a link to the gun: http://www.sirmailorder.ca/show_prod.php?p...d=43&PHPSESSID= but we all know that Kerry wants to ban all guns
-
JOTW, how dare you claim the GOP would have an agenda with their Kerry on Iraq video~! Seriously dude. Yeah.
-
Triple H has a super German skull t-shirt!
-
Nidia.. bouncy bouncy bouncy Will she be the female equivilent of Puerto Rico, wanting to be in a relationship but not wanting to get married or break up?
-
More on the guy in the first ad: http://www.amnesty133.org/ai/actionteams/d...eissfelder.html
-
Didn't Bush have a double digit lead on Gore in October 2000, around the time of the debates?
-
Any national poll that has Nader beating his 2000 numbers while on the ballot in 30 fewer states is one that is just bull I don't know why they just don't make it Bush/Kerry/Nader/Bednarik, Bednarik will probably finish better than Nader
-
Oh yeah.. I checked the vote totals for the Voting Rights Act House: 333-85 Senate: 77-19 Just a late addition
-
"We were honored to aid the rise of democracy in Germany and Japan and Nicaragua and Central Europe and the Baltics" hmm.. ok
-
Maybe Bill was on the Adkins diet and he went a bit far?
-
Here's the speech with notes, I dug this up:
-
Why does Bill have to be such an attention whore? He just did it to get in the news. damnit KKK
-
"To be fair, there are some things my opponent is for - he's proposed more than two trillion dollars in new federal spending so far, and that's a lot, even for a senator from Massachusetts." - Bush "His policies of tax and spend - of expanding government rather than expanding opportunity - are the policies of the past. We are on the path to the future -- and we are not turning back." - Bush "I've got big balls" - AC/DC
-
Booking for the 9/9 show, from the MOON!
Rob E Dangerously replied to Patty O'Green's topic in Brandon Truitt
Rick Shirley is available. PM me if interested -
So, does Bush have the fuzzy math to show that he'll reduce spending, while proposing all this new stuff?
-
George W. Bush is only a social conservative and he is an economic freespender
-
Well, it took long enough to allow for the appointment of VPs. Granted, I'm not a huge fan of the current electoral college although I don't see much reason to have a seperate vote for Vice President. It was more of the "dumb stuff" thing. Edwards and Quayle weren't the least experienced candidates for VP or President. Although Edwards has had 6 years in the Senate, and Bush had 6 years as Governor of Texas. That might be close, considering that the Governor of Texas isn't that strong of a position (the Lieutenant governor has most of the power). and who kept it going for twelve years? Harding, Coolidge and Hoover. Of course, a Southern Progressive is a politician who is for poor white people and pretty much that's the biggest difference. That's a contrast to the Henry Wallace type of Progressive. Johnson was much more suited to get stuff done in the Senate and probably much more willing to sacrifice Southern votes. Considering that the Republicans didn't start fielding viable candidates in the South until the 1960s, and the days of blatant racism were gone by then. There's probably a better example than someone like Helms, but the person probably isn't well known anyways. Strange, I thought the story was that Strom changed his ways six years after going Republican. Must have been a diversion. Then again, Gore and Fulbright were both out of office by the 1970s. They would both be around 2 on the scale of Southern Politicians. Not much more than a story or two in most Americans lifetimes. Other than appointments, the CRA and possibly the VRA (which I would have to check on) And which party provided most of the votes? The Democrats True. But they chose to do what would get them votes instead of what was right. Confusing the national party with the Southern Branch. I'm pretty sure that apologies are irrelevant right now. The idea of segregation is six feet under and the mourners of it's death are few. I haven't heard too much on who's leaving the campaign. I've heard that people are joining the campaign. It might be more like "adding new stuff" instead of "cleaning house" So, where are those sources? And yes, a tax hike makes you look like a jackass after you promise to not raise taxes. But, we've noticed that.