Zorin Industries

How about one that says "Black Plague Tour of Europe" and it gives the dates of a bunch of outbreaks, with a black and red outline of a flea underneath it. I almost bought that shirt of a person's back once, it was so cool. That reminds me of the Adolf Hitler World Tour shirt my friend has

This has been really good so far, i'm enjoying the prominent role the Green Arrow is taking.

Man Parrish: Hip Hop Be Bop Don't Stop (RockAmerica Remix)

The Knife: N.Y. Hotel

Bush will win, I really don't want to see it, but I don't think Kerry has what it takes to oust him. Playing to the Populist vote with the war on terror will get Bush back in

The amount of trendies wearing t-shirts with Soviet emblems on them is REALLY pissing me off, especially when the majority of them are completly clueless of what any of it means

http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/revi...29411278281.htm I think this guy makes some fairly good points on DKSA

What are you talking about, everyone knows the first moon landing was done by the British in 1892.

Do we know which GL he is going to play?

I like the guy, hes always been dead-on with me

That was in the Hutton report which was roundly condemened as a whitewash, by nearly every other news service in the U.K, left or right when it came out. There has been some change in the BBC being careful to toe the line, but not much drastic change as far as I can see.

So whos me-too?

I can only talk from my own experience of watching the BBC, and to me it does feel as though they try to be impartial. They are certainly a lot better than the vast majority of the British print media, which dosen't even try to hide its bias. I can't speak with any real auhority on Fox, as I have only seen it briefly, but what I have seen reminded of those papers

Sorry, i'm still not seeing it. Is it just because of the reporting of the war in Iraq. Yes, it was somewhat critical, but it is news, not propaganda. I would say the BBC is still one of the best broadcasters out there, and a vast majority of the British public would agree with me.

Mind if I ask how you formed your'e opinion on this Mike?

Heh, that was one of my first thoughts too

As far as I can see, no, it is a respected news service. Having watched both it and Fox News, I would say there is a difference between the way both channels present news. To be honest I don't really think Foxe News would fly over here as a primary news service

Weren't the photos and video of sexual torture seen behind closed doors by Senators, I think I remember something about that on the news a month or two ago?

Do you not think its a little bit two faced for Bush and Blair to sit their and preach about how Iraqis are know free from the tyranny of Saddam, but turn a blind eye to suffering in another regime just because it is convienant? Is this not how we got into this situation in the first place.

Oh yeah, it is in a prime strategic location, but the thing is all we have heard is that its great Saddam is gone and now his people are free. But yet we turn a blind eye when it is convienent. I'm not really surprised, I mean this type of thing has happened for years, look at the Cold War. I'm actually just surprised there hasn't been more talk of this anywhere.

It's Marney!

I'd still take the BBC over many other news organisations, it may not be impartial, but I do think that it is a hell of a lot more middle of the road than most.

Nah, his brain is really in a robot and his bodyguard is a giant gorillia.

When we give regimes like this millions in aid? http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,1261480,00.html I remember hearing about this before the war in Iraq, I always wondered why it was not picked up on more? If the West went into Iraq to stop this kind of thing, why is it swept under the rug when it comes to their allies?

Just a question, what would the legal standing be for Iraqi soldiers caught fighting the U.S. troops now, say in Najaf (sp?), if they clamied they were fighting against the occupation of their country?