ChrisMWaters

Holy Shit! Tenta returns. Either that, or, like I said, Richard Keil makes his WWE debut.

Nah... It doesn't even come close to one of Andre and Studd's matches.

I find it funny that except for Jericho/HBK...all the Match of the year candidates are from Smackdown. Gee, I wonder why THAT is? ^_-

Don't know any star rating for it...but Angle/Benoit from Royal Rumble should be there too.

Not counting the whole "30 Days, Eric" storyline.

...the title of this thread made me think about Brock Lesnar fighting against Richard Keil for some odd reason.

You know what I'm thinking.... Minus the female influence...Brock and Angle sorta become like the Mega Powers... ...then again, maybe that's just me.

....In Rio Diginaro Thank you, Mr. Patterson.

[NOTE: The opinions expressed here are made from someone who has been up for 18 hours, and got done an 8 hour shift in Atlantic City at his job. If thoughts sound confusing in this post, that's why.] OK...I know many of you are now enjoying the Roster Split/Brand Extension (pick which name you like better)...saying it gets some people TV Time... But with them cutting back some stars here and there...it's probably not going to last much longer. I'm just speculating, no honest news sources by this. Now...let's say at WrestleMania 20 (or the night after, whatever) they decided to end the seperation. Problem in our eyes: people who have gotten TV time during the Extension/Split (Cena, Guerreros, Hurricane, Cruiserweights, Et All) would not get as much time. Personally though, i had an idea of how it could be booked properly...if Vince was willing to put his ego aside. Or...say, if Shane McMahon took over and stayed off TV like he does currently. First off...Velocity and Heat would become like Superstars and Raw were back in the day...they would build up stars, keeping heat on them...by beating up "developmental talent" (read: Jobbers). Well, like they are now...but they'd be promoted more. On Raw and Smackdown, talk about stars debuting on said shows and such. Since, with the end of the split, the rosters would be re-unified, you could have a chance to make stronger divisions. Hurricane could go back to the cruiserweights...and since he's hung with the big guys for a while now on Raw, he could give a bit more credibility to the division (side note: kinda funny a guy with a goofy gimmick could give a division credibility, huh?). Have up and coming cruiserweights on Velocity. Also...end recaps on Velocity and Heat. That's what Bottom Line and Afterburn are for, aren't they? WHY do we need them on shows with matches? For World Title contenders...well, first off...give HHH a feud OUTSIDE the World Title. Just for the record...by World Title, I mean when, if the extension ends, the World Title and the WWE Title are unified...making the WWE World Title. Brock Lesnar, if built properly, could be a megastar. He's only 24 (I think that's right) right now...so he has YEARS ahead of him. If worked on in the charisma department a TINY bit more, he could take the company by storm...being a figurehead like Hogan was in Rock and Wrestling and Austin was in the Attitude Era. Intercontinental Division could be used for better names. Same with the US Title (incidentally...IC Title = low main event/high mid card, while US title = mid-low Mid Card). This could further bring a good amount of credible future contenders for the World Title down the road. Women's matches: Have the women built up more on Heat. Less fear of multiple women's feuds. However, keep Torrie Wilson, Jackie Gayda, and Linda Miles in Valet mode. Nidia...well, I liked the Nidia/Molly match I saw on Smackdown last year, so she could be there. Less televised title matches are good. Here me out...the champion is special. He earned the right to be called champion...he needs to be treated like it's a bonus to have him on the show. And if he is on the show...make it more non-title matches to build him up. Title matches should be saved mostly for a Pay Per View...and maybe a smattering of defenses in between. Pay Per Views should be lessened. Think about it...the only reason WWF went to monthly Pay Per Views is because WCW was doing it. I personally perfered 5 Pay Per Views a year...but I could see 6 working. January would be Royal Rumble, March or April would be WrestleMania, since King of the Ring seems to be dead, June could be anything (Bad Blood, Vengeance, Backlash...any one works). August could be Summerslam. Early October could be another PPV, and late November would be Survivor Series. That way, more time to build matches and feuds, ability to give some stars more time, and make Pay Per View events seem more important. Also, as stated once before, there should be a ranking system for the WWE. In the singles division, WWE World Champion of course would be the top guy by the rankings...then there'd be a seperate one for Cruiserweight, Women's, and Tag Team rankings. The IC and US titles could improve someone's rankings...providing they win matches with the championship (in other words, not like Christian's run with the title). As for who I'd have with the belts when we started? WWE World Champion: Brock Lesnar (sorry, I like the guy. He could beat either Helmsley or Goldberg for the World Title) WWE Intercontinental Champion: Since the split would have ended...I'd say Matt Hardy could be a very interesting Intercontinental Champion. He possibly could have a better reign with the title than his brother did. WWE United States Champion: A good, solid heel would be good here. Mid to low mid card...give Goldust a chance to redeem himself, reviving his heel act. WWE World Tag Team Champions: Either The World's Greatest Tag Team, or an up and coming team that never got a chance at the gold. WWE Cruiserweight Champion: Hmm...there are a few good choices. Rey Mysterio, Hurricane...or if they built him up enough, I could possibly see Spanky as champion. Hell, maybe even Randy Orton, saying he cut weight. WWE Women's Champion: A good heel woman's champion can be interesting. Molly Holly all the way! Comments, suggestions? EDIT: Oh, and like mentioned in the other thread...cut down the damn backstage vignettes!

Bleh...not another vacating of the Women's title. We've had that too many times in WWF/E history (Rockin' Robin, Alundra Blayze, Chyna) I just say work slowly with what you have, and slowly hire more women.

That's impossible. He has to die SOMETIME.

6: Always have a good planned out back-up plan. In case of an injury of a wrestler in a major storyline, have a replacement you can build. 7: Less comedy. Wrestling should be serious...not a joke. Comedy in spurts is good...comedy throughout the whole show is not good. Think about it...(sorry to harp on this one play of his, but that's the one I remember) Macbeth had only one comedy scene where it was needed. Not all over the place.

Duane Gill and Barry Horowitz were a team? JOBBER INCORPORATED! All they needed was the Brooklyn Brawler and it'd be complete.

Ah, didn't know it was used already. Thanks for the info...(goes to edit E-Fed bio with that move)

Eh, I just wanted to see a resurgance of ECW Rules. But still, maybe that's why I didn't mention it in the first place. Though...Street Fights are more like ECW Rules matches than Hardcore Matches, because there are no Falls Count Anywhere rules.

I would love to be one in the room when Vince turned violent. Not saying I could kick Vince's ass one on one, but a few of us beating Vince down and knocking some sense into him sounds like a good time to me. Sounds good to me too. I could debut a few submission moves I made up while in an E-Fed up. Which to use on him though... The Compressor (combination Dragon Sleeper, Knee in the back, leg pressed into chest) Figure Four Anklelock (like the Figure Four Leglock...only the other leg gets the ankle twisted at the same time) or... Death By Torture (Camel Clutch position...but with a Dragon Sleeper insted of just pulling up on the chin.)

Oh god no. The Hardcore Title name is forever dregged as a comedy title. It was brought in as a gag...was forever a gag... Now...not to say I don't like Hardcore Wrestling. But don't bring back the Hardcore Title. Make a title where it's defended under ECW Rules (No DQ, no Count Out, no Time Limit). Call it...the Extreme Title. Tommy Dreamer can be the first champion after a grueling and bloody tournament.

That's just there in case my wording is wrong. Not because of my opinions.

Eh, don't kill Triple H. Killing is wrong. Maybe give him a double Gowen (I.E. two prosthetic legs)

Here's a thought about the HHH/Orton feud if it happens. Orton is still kinda green in the ring. Therefore, there's more of a chance of him botching a spot during a match with HHH. Say Orton was booked to win...and HHH got injured by a botched spot. Would that be considered Win Win all around?

Actually, there's a big problem right there. They've turned "wrestling" into a dirty word, a gimmick. Now the only "wrestlers" in the WWE world are guys like Angle, Benoit, Jericho and Guerrero. The rest are sports entertainers. Would Lesnar qualify in Sports Entertainers?

I hope that price was a joke... That's more than they charge for front row!

I'm hoping they bring Axxess to this year's Wrestlemania By then, I should have the replica of my avatar...and I'd like to see whoever is the WWE (not World Heavyweight) champion with that belt on to compare. ...so sue me, I liked the winged eagle belt.

You know, I kinda feel weird. I...actually like Zack Gowen. Keep in mind, I saw him BEFORE they brought him into WWE...when he was Tenacious Z still. I saw him wrestle Road Dogg (well, BG James now) on NWA-TNA...and I liked what he could do. Plus, I've always hated Road Dogg, since his debut cost a wrestler I liked a match when he was the Roadie for Jeff Jarrett. So, I still like Zack. Problem is...they brought him in wrong. If they brought him in properly, there may not have been as much hate for him as there is now. Oh, and I still want to see a Spanky/Gowen tag team for some odd reason.

You're suppossed to suspend belief with that. But still, Zack's selling isn't THAT off the wall. That's all I'm saying.