KTID

Before I head out for the rest of the day, I'm currious as to who you would name as both "Best Overall Worker" and "Best Wrestler", both of all time. I know you dislike Flair, so who are the guys that you truly love to watch. Not just now, as I said, but throughout the years. I agree with Rudo, i've seen better. As for whom, I've stated many a time that I feel the greatest in-ring worker of all time is Tom 'Dynamite Kid' Billington and the greatest in-ring worker today is Chris Benoit. However, my favourite wrestler *OVERALL* is without a doubt, Rob Van Dam.

What comments?

^^^^^^^ So he says

Austin/Goldberg is *the* match.

Just to clear this up once and for all, I DIDN'T WRITE THIS OR THE OTHER ONE. I just posted them since I thought they were interesting reads which would spark a good discussion, which they both have BTW. They were written by Will Parrish of the now defunct AlternativeWrestling.com. Any complaints should be sent to [email protected]

It was only the 2nd one! And it was the best. Actually it was the *FIRST* one.

Just posted these in General Wrestling and wanted to draw your attention to them. 20 Most Essential Matches (1982-2001) 10 Essential Pay-Per-View Events

Just wanted to tell everyone in the most populated folder about a post in a less populated one.

It doesn't. That's why its in General Wrestling.

Hey, I never made them up. Complaints to [email protected]

^^^ That's because he's The Rock. Angle, however, isn't even close.

2002 EASILY.

You all know the *REAL* reason he's not around here anymore don't you.... ....I sued him for Copyright infringement!

No Hall or Waltman?

He's even got a higher post count than me. Thats it i'm sueing.

hmmm...surely I can sue this guy for Copyright infringement. Yes, i've checked with the World Wildlife Fund and they have confirmed that this guys name may "cause confusion in the marketplace".

hmmm...surely I can sue this guy for Copyright infringement.

I know Meltzer is considered "The Man" when it comes to "wrestling journalists" but personally I consider Wad Keller to be a much better reviewer. For example, His No Mercy ratings were, in my opinion, much more accurate than Meltzer's. See for yourself: Tajiri/Rey - ***1/4 Benoit/A-Train - **3/4 Gowen/Hardy - ** APA/Bashams - *1/2 Vince/Stephanie - nothing listed Angle/Cena - ***3/4 Eddie/Show - **1/4 Brock/Taker - **½ Just as a reminder to save you going back 4 pages, Meltzers ratings: Mysterio v. Tajiri ***3/4 Benoit v. A-Train ***1/4 Hardy v. Gowen ** APA v. Bashams 3/4* Vince v. Stephanie **3/4 Angle v. Cena ****1/4 Eddy v. Big Show ** Lesnar v. Undertaker ** --- See, he over-rates Benoit, Angle, Mysterio and Tajiri and under-rates Big Show and The Undertaker.

of course.

We prefer "ECW enthusiasts", and we don't all live in Philly.

Sorry, lets not get into an argument.

The cage tag match for one is much better than Angle-Benoit.

Rated: 3 Vs Rated: 10 --- You must have them the wrong way around.

debateable, though Angle/Benoit as MOTY is not even worth arguing.

Yeah, for WWE. There are at least a dozen matches that were better so far in 2003, though not WWE.