syxx2001

treble, he keeps saying he is spending "9.95" but not to see Russo and the consistancy sucks and all of this other stuff but he doesn't buy it for himself. He buys it for Dames. If I went to Blockbuster and rented "Jackie Chan's Famous Fights" for my mom and I watched it with her and I hated it, it's kinda not right to complain about spending your money on something that sucked because it wasn't for you to watch to begin with. Thats how I see it.

You can complain, but not the "Im spending 10 dollars" stuff. If I spend 16 dollars to take my little sister to see "Big dogs in a little world" and I dont really want to see then Im not going to say "I cant believe I spent 8 dollars to see that. All dogs go to heaven comes on cable for free, that movie sucked ass. Blah blah blah". Maybe thats just me.

Am I the only person who thought HHH was gonna say "And you cant run to that promotion in Nashville"?

No, seriously. What do you pay 10 dollars for. On a sidenote, if you are paying for Dames, you shouldn't be complaining as you aren't watching the show to enjoy it.

Bob, what do you pay 10 dollars for Wednesdays?

mIRC and newsgroups are the only things with the wrestling. BT has it SOMETIMES. And you cant download if you have Outlook Express.

But you can make up various excuses to put the blame on Jarrett....

he needs to be elevated before he can be killed off again I hate when people say that. The same people who elevate him do what? Kill his heat.

Russo's fault. I think. Raven's fault. And if you dont call 1000 people giving you the loudest pop in the arena, I dont know what you consider "over". And some people need to realize this. TNA listens to the fans, but they dont hand out surveys asking what new angle you would like. Doing that would kill the company. Like the WWE, if they just threw Matt Hardy and John Cena in a main event fued putting the title on Cena, how many people do you think would take it serious? You have a rapper and a arrogant guy feuding. It might seem good to you, but it might not to others. So TNA takes our opinions on things and fixes them up, or do whatever. Its like when I emailed Borash. I still haven't figured out if I had any influence, but I emailed him suggesting the X Division/Luchadores fued. But emailing them saying "Fued Raven and Malice" isn't going to get you anywhere. If they have a program planned for someone or plan on doing something in the near future, or are doing things they think are right, you aren't going to change that. You can't go to Microsoft and say "Make a OS that is stable" if they have something else planned.

Well MixxMaster why not throw the World title on Rodney Mack?

Do you think that the WWE should have titles change at house shows frequently to boost attendance? And if it works, should they record the matches like a fan cam or something and play them on TV on RAW or Smackdown and at the arenas via the Titantrons so no one misses out on anything? But then that would defeat the whole purpose of title changes at house shows as you could still see it the next week on TV, unless theres some freak who likes to see title changes live.... What do you think?

Russo has been around since week 5, so what are you complaining about "BEFORE RUSSO"?

I guess Diesal made HBK look like a joke too.

8 fucking minutes? You are complaining over 8 motherfucking minutes? During those 8 minutes, AJ Styles was put over. AND it also futhered the Daniels/Jarrett thing. I would be more pissed at Bradshaw taking up 8-10 minutes on a $40 PPV than Russo actually progressing something in that same time frame for 1/4th of the price. Last week, Russo was on TV for 8 minutes maybe. Doing what? Setting up the Styles/Low Ki match. And if you count Russo doing commentary as "taking up time" then Mike Tenay and Don West are the biggest time hoggers in the world. The week before that, Russo was on screen for 4 minutes maybe in the AJ Styles sit down interview. Unless you count being handcuffed to Erik Watts "hogging time from the wrestlers". The week before that Russo was on screen for 2 minutes maybe in that sit down interview with Mike Tenay. The week before that Russo was on screen for 5 minutes probably in an "argument" with Styles and running in during the main event arguing with the ref. The week before Russo was on screen maybe 7-10 minutes setting up the D'Lo Brown/AJ Styles 2/3 falls match for the next week. The least time Russo was even on TV for more than 10 minutes on July 9th when he and Legend beat up Jarrett 3 times or something.

Any Red sell looks cool. He either flies to the other side of the ring, or if he is germaned or powerbombed, he just keeps his ass in the air and lays on his neck.

RUSSO ISN'T HOGGING AIRTIME. HE WAS ON TV FOR 5-8 MINUTES ON WEDNESDAY. OUT OF A FUCKING 100 MINUTE SHOW. JESUS THIS IS GETTING OLD.

Sable has a fan base?

Well it doesn't really matter. That show sucked anyway so Mabel being there wouldn't have been the first thing to turn them away...or something.

You were probably one of those who said it wouldn't survive past August 2002. And ECW also didn't get any promotion from TNN either. Them being on on Friday nights when most teens are out smoking and racing cars didn't help either.

Theres that 10 dollar thing when he was on the show for less than a minute...at the end of the show....after the main event.

Where did I say it was OK? I said why do people complain and the same ones that complain would probably do the same thing they do. And Mabel wasn't there to wrestle, he was there to be Truth's bodyguard.

Didn't most people enjoy Gilberti's serious side? Wasn't Mabel on one show for less than 30 seconds? The fans in the arena kept popping for the TNA girls, so they kept showing them. It isn't like they wrestled a match or anything. For whatever it's worth, I think the AMW thing was good as it showed that even the best of teams sometimes have problems. Even though it was accidental, most tag teams dont bicker like that and get back together good as new. BPS already stated that Jarrett is probably used as much as he is because he is the only person that they can count on to appear week in and week out. We could be seeing Jerry Jarrett trying to recapture his youth tagging with AMW. Be lucky you dont. The Jerry Lynn/Justin Credible matches, while short, were fun, especially the last man standing match. And another question, how come most people blast Triple H and Jarrett for putting themselves, when 90% of people in that same position, probably the same people who complain, would do the same.

Its a better way to 1) Avoid the "Ill shove you off the ladder" spots. 2) Since there are 3 people and 2 sides to a ladder, 1 person would be left out. 3) It allowed everyone to have an equal chance to get to the belt.

i liked it alot. kazarian botched alot of spots tho and the belt falling didn't really hurt the match. at least they didn't say "since the belt fell, no one is the winner" or something.