Bored

...and THAT boys and girls is the history of Baseball. Uhhh not quite...you know there is all those other teams and their players that have played. I mean I know they don't matter to Yankee and Red Sox fans. Why don't you guys just play each other 162 times year and just have one big circle jerk?

Exactly...your in danger of a Nebraska in 2001 situation all over again.

I'll definently make a topic tommorrow for the BCS selection show because it will be must see t.v. now. Hopefully collegebcs.com can get a hold on the BCS rankings before the official announcement tommorrow.

Well Oklahoma is gonna drop to #3 in both voting polls although I would doubt any further. USC is going to be #1 in both polls tommorrow and LSU #2 but the question is will USC get shut out? I think Oklahoma's spot is safe unless the voters really punish them hard for this performance and drop to #4 or #5.

Yes the AP has no connection to the BCS so they can vote whoever they want. If USC gets shut out of the Sugar Bowl and beats Michigan in the Rose Bowl that will cause as split national champion. The Coaches' poll has to automatically vote #1 the winner of the so-called national championship game. I'm marking out like a mother fucker over the possibilities. Goodbye BCS...we hardly knew you.

Must...resist...urge...to write...BCS eulogy. I'll wait till tommorrow.

Now if USC goes to #1 in both polls but Oklahoma only drops to #2 that probably puts USC in the Sugar Bowl but if Oklahoma drops to #3 (which is likely if this score remains so lopsided) then LSU goes to #2 there is a chance USC wouldn't be in the Sugar Bowl despite being the #1 in country. *dances on the BCS grave*

YES USC #1 IN THE AP POLL AND MIGHT NOT PLAY IN SUGAR BOWL!!!!! hahahahahaha Hey BCS...YOU FUCKED UP, YOU FUCKED UP, YOU FUCKED UP!

I have two arguments for LSU over USC, namely their stronger schedule and loss to a better team (ranked Florida versus unranked Cal) and if they repeat over Georgia tonight then they should be in the title game. On the other hand, as I've said, I think it's you-know-what that it can come down to all the indirect factors, like a game between two sub-.500 teams Granted it was to a better team LSU's loss was at home and they were pretty dominated by Florida most of the day while USC's loss came on the road in triple overtime. Also going into today USC had a higher strengh of schedule that LSU. LSU's will push pass them by getting a 2nd game against Georgia. On top of that LSU's non-conference schedule was a joke: Louisana-Monroe, Arizona, I-AA Western Illinois, and Louisiana Tech.

Very bad news for USC. I know you could make a good argument for LSU but I think this is a joke and the BCS will have failed yet again. USC has done nothing to hurt their spot at as the #2 team in the country and they deserve to be playing for the national title, period. Now I should probably be rooting for Georgia now since I would like to see the Pac-10 get a chance at the national title and they should have had a shot in 2001 with Oregon. Then again if this does play out I do get my Pac-10/Big Ten match-up in the Rose Bowl, really doesn't get any better than USC/Michigan, and still a shot at a split national champion which could be the crushing blow to the BCS. Hmmm decisions, decisions.

Some rivalry...one team gets bitched slapped for the last 80+ years and that's a rivaly? Meh. There a lot of us fans of the other 28 teams who don't care about either team and are already sick of those two comparing dick size all offseason.

No one will care but...Stanford beat #1 Kansas 64-58 today! It always amazes me how good of a team Mike Montgomery is able to put together every year. They didn't even have probably their best player in Josh Childress today as he's injured.

Yes and Matt Leinhart is also a sophomore and they have a talented group of freshmen running backs led by Reggie Bush so I think its a good bet USC will be preseason #1 next year as they will be scary good.

Mike Williams is yo daddy. Sick, sick one-handed catch for a touchdown.

Nathan Jones quits...but won't he think of the children? They need their breast milk.

Yes Oklahoma would be in the Sugar Bowl still but the point would be is that it creates a BCS nightmare scenerio with three one loss teams. Think about it if Oklahoma lost and USC wins but LSU ends up in the Sugar Bowl meaning USC the #1 team in the final regular season AP poll (they would move to #1 by the OU loss) would not be playing for the national championship. THAT would be an a major embarrasment. I don't think Oklahoma is going to lose and for the BCS sake they better not. Of course the door is open for a split national champion still if LSU goes to the Sugar Bowl and upsets Oklahoma and USC beats Michigan in the Rose Bowl and then USC and LSU will split the national championship as remember the BCS only officially decides the Coaches' poll national champ not the AP's. Oh and so Damaramu doesn't go another rant about Oklahoma being disrespected these are just scenerios I'm throwing out there and not necerssarily what will happen. Edit: Add on to another post as guess Keith Jackson got the weekend off as he's not doing the USC game. Mussburger is doing in the Big XII title game.

Well according to espn.com's Brad Edwards it would have be nearly impossible for LSU to get to the #2 spot if Notre Dame had won but now that they are going to lose it leaves the door wide open. Again can't we just get a playoff and not have to worry about games between 5-6 teams deciding who plays for the national championship?

Musberger is the #2 guy to my knowledge and Fouts does the games with Keith Jackson. Read my previous post, Jackson is Pac-10 exclusive except when he did the Michigan/Ohio State game. When he "retired" a few years back it was basically just to work his way to only doing west coast games since he lives out here to cut down on his travel. You'll hear him today on the Oregon St./USC game and he does the Rose Bowl.

Not that it really means anything but why does ABC have their #1 national announce crew of Nessler and Griese (since Keith Jackson only does the Pac-10 with the exception of the Michigan/Ohio St. game this year) on Notre Dame/Syracuse and not the Big XII title game? Notre Dame still runs the college football world even at 5-6 against another 5-6 team.

-Hmmm interesting topic...well I already said in the offseason thread that I don't think the Yankees won't win another World Series this decade but I don't know how bold that is. -Barry Bonds will come in to Spring Training 20-30 lbs. lighter and will miss half the season due to injuries and hit less than 20 homeruns. -The A's will only win 88 games this year but still win the A.L. West. -The only players that are suspended for steroid use will conveniently be non-star players on small market teams. Okay not really bold there. -The heir apparant to Bud Selig will not be Sandy Alderson but Giants' majority owner Peter Magowan. -Before the decade is over the Arizona Cardinals will win a Super Bowl. -The 49ers will not reach the playoffs for another 10 years. -Michael Vick's career will be plauged by injuries and he'll never lead the Falcons to another playoff victory.

Houston - 17 pts. Green Bay Baltimore Philadelphia Jacksonville Tennessee - LOCK Pittsburgh Detroit Minnesota New Orleans N.Y. Giants San Francisco Kansas City New England Buffalo Carolina St. Louis

Velocity: Funaki vs. Akio Spanky & Paul London vs. Kanyon & Chad Collyer Orlando Jordan vs. Jobber Bradshaw vs. Rhyno Smackdown: Chavo Guerrero vs. Shelton Benjamin Basham Brothers vs. Rikishi & Scotty 2 Hotty Jamie Noble vs. Sakoda Chris Benoit vs. John Cena Shannon Moore vs. Big Show Brock Lesnar vs. Winner of Benoit/Cena match

Giambi makes way too much money and has way too many years left on his contract for anyone to be interested so they're stuck with him.

God damn Miami of Ohio is good...they pummel Bowling Green yet again 49-27 for the MAC title.

We all know that the Grammys and pretty much all music award shows mean nothing, right?