

SuperJerk
Members-
Content count
9706 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by SuperJerk
-
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detai...?v=glance&s=dvd I remember when this used to come on after "That 70s Show". I loved this show, but as usual, Fox dicked around and moved it around on the schedule and started showing epsidoes out of order so you'd have no clue what was going on. Its basically the misadventures of a garage owner, his nuerotic (but hot) girlfriend, his skirt-chasing alcoholic father, his effeminate best friend, and his dumb-as-a-post brother. Stories were told through a combination of childhood flashbacks, black and white naration (which was usually recylced material from Christopher Titus's real-life stand-up routine), and interaction with the other regulars, and lots of jokes about drinking.
-
Relax, man. I think he was being sarcastic by calling it his favorite.
-
I concur. I've read Cap nonstop since Heroes Return, and this is definitely the best he's been since then.
-
Just my opinion, but "The Ultimates" is fucking awesome. Its the only book from that imprint I can still stand.
-
According to Missy Hyatte, Virgil.
-
It was funny. I was kidding you back.
-
Like you've never made a typo, smartass.
-
HTQ brings the quality. That's so going in the sig.
-
It also means Orlando Jordan beat the guy who scored multiple clean wins over Triple H last year.
-
Job out all the new draft picks? At this point, the WWE is just inventing NEW WAYS to book stupidly. I remember a couple of weeks ago when PK said in the Smackdown recap that they were just letting SD circle the drain...I thought he was being to harsh. Man, was I wrong. I quit watching during the bulk of JBL's title reign, but decided I'd give them another chance. *sigh* Fuck Smackdown.
-
Did I accidentally log onto The Bizarro Marks Forum? None of these match results you guys have posted make a damn bit of sense.
-
It's assumed he's either going back to RAW or changing gimmicks. Him winning tonight would be a major shock. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well controversy aside.. is either guy really suitable to be the number one contender at SS? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Good point.
-
The argument ended before you ever got here.
-
I think they're executive producers on the TV show in name only.
-
I think the first two disks are only supposed to represent the first season.
-
The version that was initally available on video (and aired on ABC) had extra footage, but wasn't the director's cut. The director had nothing to do with that particular version, but did make a special "director's edition" which includes special effects that were recently created using CGI.
-
You're welcome, although you have no clue what we were actually arguing about. What I originally asked wasn't "who is she?" but rather: So shut the fuck up, dumb ass.
-
Proving once again that WWE programming makes people more aggressive.
-
Now I'm actually sorry I didn't know who she was.
-
And I bet if you asked 1000 people who was in it, 999 of them would say Bill Murray. 99% of the publicity related to the movie focused on Bill Murray. Scarlett Johanssen is not a big star yet. It is perfectly understandable for me to not know who she is.
-
You're confused. I'm not debating how good the film "Lost in Translation" was, I'm saying it wasn't a big enough hit that'd I'd have no choice but not know who the female star of it was. This is especially true since 99% of the publicity related to the movie focused on Bill Murray.
-
I didn't see or hear her name mentioned in ONE commerical for "In Good Company". And, despite how good it might have been, most people simply didn't see "Lost in Translation". Despite its apparent quality, it wasn't a hit. So...what's she been in that was such a huge hit (i.e. lots of people saw it) I'd have no choice but to know who she is? The answer is nothing. You guys keep talking about movies hardly anyone saw. I'm not saying they're not good movies, but I doubt they've been seen by enough people to turn her into the big star Curry is acting like she is. I'm not saying she's not pretty. I'm not saying she can't act. I'm just saying I've never heard of her, and I didn't understand why you guys were acting like she's this huge star, and (according to Curry) has been for the last 3 years. Excuse the fuck out of me for not knowing who someone is, when there's no good reason I should have.
-
None of those movies were even remotely hits (I'm basing this on amount of tickets sold). And you're actually trying to claim I should have heard of her because she was in "The Horse Whisperer"? You assholes are acting like I said I'd never heard of Natalie Portman (who actually WAS famous 3 years ago, unlike some people Curry thinks were...).
-
This board isn't exactly representative of the general public.
-
You won't answer it because you CAN'T answer it. This is just a ridicules bullshit statement. Sorry you can't back it up.