data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c189/0c189e943e7d2b05a140e34d4a70f81dad5450d2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2ed3/f2ed3e727ad34175d1012eec968b988564b19fed" alt=""
SuperJerk
Members-
Content count
9706 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by SuperJerk
-
You should change your screen name to Tony Shiavone after posting something like that.
-
The entire "Epic Submission" contest got knifed in the crib within weeks of it being announced by Bill Jemas/Joe Quesada's bosses. The whole thing basically amounted to a huge ass con-job that Jemas did without the approval of his bosses (which is one of the reasons why Jemas is no longer with Marvel) and critics have openly hinted that the whole thing was one huge and nasty scam where Marvel never EVER planned on publishing people's submissions as comics and that all of the submissions were simply used as a non-official survey to see what Marvel secondary characters were popular and could be relaunched via a big named writer/have their movie rights be sold off ala Blade. Was Jemas also behind the "Sentry" scam a few years back? I still haven't forgiven Marvel for that.
-
Edited for accuracy. Creative. I'm not sure who I stole that spot from. Try every two-bit hack who ever posted on a message board at any point in history. -=Mike So I stole it from you?
-
Edited for accuracy. Creative. I'm not sure who I stole that spot from.
-
Edited for accuracy.
-
Except for, you know, facts. BWA HA HA HA. Wikipedia is good for---facts? BWA HA HA HA. Seeing as how I already showed that their definition of jihad was woefully inadequate, it's odd you stick with them. -=Mike I'll admit, sometimes the articles are incomplete. I looked up the term "full of shit", and for some reason you weren't mentioned once! Ah, STILL trying to start a fight, eh? Well, as usual, you won't get banned. You know, since you're the Teflon poster and all. -=Mike To quote the kid from the "Say No to Drugs" commercial: "I learned it from watching you."
-
Except for, you know, facts. BWA HA HA HA. Wikipedia is good for---facts? BWA HA HA HA. Seeing as how I already showed that their definition of jihad was woefully inadequate, it's odd you stick with them. -=Mike I'll admit, sometimes the articles are incomplete. I looked up the term "full of shit", and for some reason you weren't mentioned once!
-
Except for, you know, facts.
-
^That made me laugh.^ Dick Morris is Jewish? Seriously, though...Trent Lott lost his position in the Seante for thinking his friend would've made a good president, but Hillary gets away with THIS? Sheesh.
-
^I'm laughing at both of you for thinking I was serious when I said that.^ I was being FACETIOUS (note: used correctly this time). "Jihad" (ǧihād جهاد) is an Arabic word which comes from the Arabic root word "jahada"; which means "exerting utmost effort" or "to strive." The word connotes a wide range of meanings, from an inward spiritual struggle to attain perfect faith, to holy war. credit: wikipedia
-
I'm wondering on where these alledged quotes came from. Not that I'm in the mood to defend my least favorite Clinton.
-
That's so cute. You think there's only one Christian church. No, I'm just simplifying things for you. -=Mike ...Are you ever going to stop trying to start a fight?... I'm not the type of person who lets bigotry go unchallenged. Or, in your case, you choose to be blinded to reality. -=Mike ...You hate bigotry, yet have no problem referring to my state as full of "inbred" children. Odd... I never said they were bad people because they're inbred, did I?
-
That's so cute. You think there's only one Christian church. No, I'm just simplifying things for you. -=Mike ...Are you ever going to stop trying to start a fight?... I'm not the type of person who lets bigotry go unchallenged.
-
File this under: Duh, but we're going to ignore it
SuperJerk replied to Stephen Joseph's topic in Current Events
I used Mike to get to the top. -
File this under: Duh, but we're going to ignore it
SuperJerk replied to Stephen Joseph's topic in Current Events
^Nice quoting.^ You omitted when you flamed me before that....which is hard to tell because evidently your computer is time-coded to a time zone in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. Mike vs. Jerk is the CE folder equivalent of HHH vs. HBK. -
Non-Bias Attack: A gang of up to 30 black teens
SuperJerk replied to EdwardKnoxII's topic in Current Events
NYPD Deputy Inspector Kevin McGinn sounds rather stupid in light of the evidence. -
File this under: Duh, but we're going to ignore it
SuperJerk replied to Stephen Joseph's topic in Current Events
You're the one who ignored him by moving the flaming to another thread. -
That's so cute. You think there's only one Christian church.
-
File this under: Duh, but we're going to ignore it
SuperJerk replied to Stephen Joseph's topic in Current Events
Ahem. -=Mike What I actually said was: Intentionally misquoting someone in an attempt to get them in trouble should be an automatic ban. -
When the dirty money comes from big names in the CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM movement --- yes, it's a huge story. -=Mike Funny how that wasn't mentioned in the article.
-
Finally something we can all agree on.
-
I know if anyone ever shot YOU in the back, I'd say "Praise Jesus". BTW, the biggest terrorist organization in the history of the US was fond of lighting crosses to symbolize purification. And what about anti-abortion terrorists? Hate crimes against gays because "God hates fags"? Aren't there so-called Christian neocons that write about nuking Iran and who condone torture?
-
"Few" doesn't quite cover the sheer volume of their crimes against humanity. There are "few" religious leaders of real religions who openly advocate murder. There AREN'T "few" Muslim leaders who don't condemn such actions and there aren't "few" adherents who commit the atrocities. I could drive people nuts by posting several stories of assorted atrocities every single day. -=Mike As if people in predominantly Christian countries never committ crimes. Not in the name of Jesus they do not. -=Mike
-
Jesus Christ...can't we limit stories about capaign finance issues to ONE thread. Newsflash: There's dirty money in politics. Shocker.
-
It was HER campaign fundraising that is raising some questions. Which makes it, largely, her responsibility. And, if the right decides to go that way, they can smear Hillary beyond recognition with this type of thing. -=Mike Hillary must micromanage every aspect of her campaign? I'll remember that the next time someone brings up stuff the Bush campaign did in the last 2 elections.