SuperJerk

Yah let's see, make over 5 mil a year as a WWE main eventer or make 250K as an NFL back up? Yah he picked the NFL for the money alright. $250K is just the minimum. Lesnar might've thought he'd be able to get on the first string and sign some endorsement deals. That adds up to more than $250K. If I was a WWE employee, I'd question how a guy that runs a fan newsletter seems to know what's in my contract. I can buy Meltzer knowing about upcoming storylines (since he knows workers who are told the upcoming angles), but contracts? I'm skeptical.

^Please go back and reread my last post.^ I've made a few corrections to it. We're going to argue in circles about the Packwood/Lewinsky/Jones shit, which is fine and dandy, but before we do, I gotta point out one thing: No, they don't. I'll totally take you to school on this if need be.

True dat.

Clinton did balance the budget, and you have no idea what you're talking about. Reality check: Republicans didn't take control of Congress until January of 1995, and most of their bills were vetoed by Clinton. Tax policy had no effect on the 1990's economy, one way or the other. Reality check: The budget Clinton proposed BEFORE the budget became balanced had $200M deficits for years and years. Everybody involved has said that the budget was balanced in spite of everything. NOBODY saw it coming before it occurred. WRONG WRONG WRONG. You've managed to confuse actual proposed budgets with OMB projections. Congratulations. The president only proposes budgets one year at a time, and those OMB projections (including the deficits) were educated guesses that proved to be wrong. I'll admit though, although the majority of Republican proposals were vetoes by the president, they did put the necessary pressure on him to make additional cuts in the federal budget. The Republicans also proposed (in the "Contract With America") tax cuts and military spending increases that would've made balancing the budget impossible, and attempted to pass them into law. If Clinton hadn't vetoed them, the budget might not have ever been balanced. Kathleen Willey. Juanitta Broaddrick. Paula Jones. Hell, at least Packwood had the decency to not completely BURY them whenever anything came out --- something Clinton did with glee. I guess anytime someone makes an accusation against Clinton, that automatically makes it true? (I forgot about the other two accusers, although my understanding was that their allegations were later proven to be unfounded.) Didn't Packwood confess? That would also make a difference in how believable his accusers are. I hope you weren't trying to imply that the treatment of Packwood (censure by the Senate and forced resignation) was a politically motivated attack by the Democrats, since he usually voted with them (Packwood was a liberal). No, when you're doing a sexual harassment suit, you have to show a history of behavior. This showed a history of behavior. History of what behavior? Lewinski NEVER accused Clinton of sexually harrassing her. THEREFORE this has nothing to do with the case. The lawyers should've dropped the Lewinski questions once she told them this. Why didn't they? Because they were more interested in attacking Clinton than getting to the truth. If I hired lawyers to sue someone for harrassing me, but they spend 99% of the time during the deposition of that person asking about an affair that both parties denied, I'd fire those fucking lawyers, because that doesn't serve my interests.

If it was very good to him he wouldn't feel miserable and want to leave. What makes you think he'll be happy playing football? He hasn't even played since high school! He's only trying the NFL because of the money. Otherwise, he'd be getting a job doing whatever-the-hell he went to college for.

Since the average American doesn't bother to vote, are you surprised?

Since Clinton vetoed most of their bills, they should only get credit for jack shit.

You're ignorant of the facts. Packwood is known to have forced himself on many women, Clinton was accused by one person of sexually propositioning her (which she admits he never tried to use his position as governor or to phsically force her to do anything). BIG difference. The Paula Jones lawyers used her case to bring the Lewinski matter into the case's deposition for NO REASON.

Clinton did balance the budget, and you have no idea what you're talking about. Reality check: Republicans didn't take control of Congress until January of 1995, and most of their bills were vetoed by Clinton. Tax policy had no effect on the 1990's economy, one way or the other.

Its only a matter of time until an explicit home video leaks out, folks.

I agree 100% with what Bradshaw said about Clinton.

I could bring myself to hate him for bad-mouthing something that was very, very good to him. Its not like Vince ever got a return on his multi-million dollar investment.

Rico's out with an injury, I beleive.

WWE is searching for reality tv writers? That might actually work. Reality shows are nothing but boring footage of people doing stuff magically made interesting because the producers find a storyline within the mundane and run with it by using creative editing.

All I'm going to say is that I really enjoyed reading it (the writing style worked well for the topic), and am really looking forward to reading the next column.

I think there's more to being a successful champ than getting a ton of tv time. And the reason Benoit wasn't thrown out is because The Rock had already been thrown out. If Benoit had been thrown out, and then returned to make the save at the end, everyone would be wondering "Why isn't Rocky with him?" rather than "Oh, good, Benoit's making the save!"

thats not the creeper, this is the creeper. ^Looks nothing like Stevie Richards in drag, FYI.^ I'm just saying, don't be shocked if you see Jack Ryder doing backstage interviews on Raw.

The only thing missing is Big Show vs. Brock Lesnar and you'd have 2003 REVISITED.

A little like predicting Germany's gonna loose World War II. It already happened.

What's with this "was" shit?

Since we're all chiming in on this, anyone else want to make fun of the complete lack of needed punctuation in this post?

I thought it was the Creeper.

Well, we found out it was unprotected sex with KANE...for no reason...except to "Save Matt". Or maybe Kane's sperm is BAH GAWD HOSS SPERM and couldn't be stopped.

The "3 I's" were never meant to be more than an ironic allusion to the character's blatant unethical behavior.

I don't think I've ever seen the words "hold" and "down" applied to Orton before.