Jump to content
TSM Forums

Perfxion

Members
  • Content count

    1048
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Perfxion


  1. This is a pointless debate. You can't truely prove one way or another the existance of Christ. There is a point when faith takes over. Science can only take a person so far. There is debate Shakespeare was ONE PERSON writing those plays. Now that was only 500 years ago. Try adding another 1500 years to prove a person lived. Now, the bible itself was starting to be written a 1000 years before. Now, lets go with this. You are trying to find the existance or try to disprove a person who lived a common life, who tried to help people, who by all reglions one of the nicest and most humble person EVER TO WALK THIS EARTH is going to be hard. Jesus was not a king. He was not a military leader. He was a man on a mission from god. So info on him won't be fully out there. His death was against the ways the Romans did trails. As I stated, believe what you want. Science and Tech can only go so far, sometimes it takes faith.

     

    Atheists fighting against Christians is going to solve NOTHING in this case. You have a better chance for Al Sharpton joining with The Klan. And using his death to prove he never existed? Well, if a person dies they must have lived. If they lived, they EXISTED!


  2. I signed up at the old Delphi board as TheNatureBoy714. When it went to EZboard, I signed up as TheNatureBoy714, like it matters, but I ended up with near 1000 post back when 1000 was a hell of alot of post. Unlike here with most member well over 2000 after 6 months.. I kept posting there through all the good and bad(flamming folder bullshit) and ugly(yellow days with the RSPW text). I signed up at WDI and posted at the beginning. But It is hard for me to keep up with two boards. I stayed here and signed up at the stwich over to TS.com before its opening(CHEATING~!). I signed as Midnight Express83, last week got it shrunk to MX.


  3. Simple ideas:

     

    1: Gimmick matches haulted on RAW and Smackdown except for a Triple threat. And except for a hardcore match. Make the gimmick matches mean something. Like Wargames was done ONCE a year. You didn't see it three PPVs in a row. Keep ladder matches and Hell in a Cell for big fueds with people who can do them. Having HHH and Nash in a Cell is a bad move. Having Taker in a ladder match is just as dumb.

     

    2: Title matches less often. I think stwiches titles has slowed down in its madness of 2001, but still it happens too often. I can't honestly tell you who Angle beat to win the WWE title going into Mania. But I can name every IC champ in 1998. WWE and World title at PPVs only is a good start but they do this by only having the title change hands at PPVs with few exceptions since Summerslam 99. Have the IC and US titles defended ONCE a month. Have the tag titles defended ONCE a month. Have the Cruiser title defended. Hire more female wrestlers so it isn't the same 6 women in a six woman tag match. Make it seem like more than just the usual 4 with Jackie and Ivory brought in to show that, yes they are on the payroll. And yes, they are alive.

     

    3: Push new guys to the top that are different. Brock, Angle, Taker, Show. That is the big main event scene for Smackdown. HHH, Goldberg, Austin, Jericho(?) is the main event scene of RAW. Change it up. Make midcarders seem like they can win it. You just might find a draw. Nobody thought Austin was going to be World champion in 1996. But they pushed him and put him over bigger talent. It worked, it got both over big time. NOBODY is drawing now. So everyone can be "The Next Big Thing".

     

    4: Push Lightweights with Lightweights. Push heavyweights with the Heavyweights. Having Big Show vs Rey helps nobody. You either bury a person you just put the world title on or you kill off a hot LHW to make Big show seem to be this monster. The CW division of WCW back in 1996 and 1997 was the right idea. Put on early liven up the crowd and get them over. Have the fued with mainly each other. Have the title meaningful. Be able to put the title on the line and have ANY of them seem like they can be champion.

     

    5: Get rid of the non-wrestling bullshit. No Al Wilson shit, No Steph being "Fired", No Sable getting fondled by Vince on TV, No Linda being attacked by Eric, No Shane vs the big bad heel in a garbage match, NONE OF this. Cut the McMahon's TV time. Make a board of Directors and have one person as the lead. Have the person only come on TV when it is something big, like others have stated. Have it be an Arn Anderson, who is old school is well off not ever wrestling again.

     

    6: Biggest and most imporant thing: Completely make over the product to not look like Attitude. Raw set needs a new look. Maybe lose the ramp, add a bend in the asileway, get rid of the red theme, change it to make it not look so dull. Make SD look like a different product. You have wrestlers, have them wrestle. If the US title was meant to be the wrestler's title, have wrestler's wrestle for it. Make it different. Make RAW look like something completely different. Having Austin being the badass, get rid of him and not have him doing that shit. If Trips has been the game for 2 years. Tell him to do some "Evolution" to something different. We seen it all, it gets stale. Get rid of the day old bread gimmick and look. And come at it different. Remember, less is more.


  4. Since 1923, many have tried to pass and ratify the ERA. Since the early 1970s, there has been Affirmative Action. Women who aspire to be firefighters have a test that is different then men because women, on the whole, are weaker than men. There are many who debate that AA is reverse discrimination. Others think AA is needed to protect people who might not have it fair. The debate over equal rights has been raging on since the 1820s with the slave issue. It is known that until the 1950s, huge discrimination was going on in this country. It was not only a southern issue.

     

    If a true ERA was put into effect it would have to be worded more in a sense to include genders and races. It would have to be more down the lines of this roughly:

     

    “Section I: No business, school, or Governmental facility could infringe on the Constitutional rights and freedoms based on race, gender, or Creed.

     

    Section II: Congress shall have the power to protect the rights of people if such infringes occur.

     

    Section III: This would come into effect 2 years after ratification from the states.”

     

    On the two thirds ruling for ratification of the states, 38 states would have to agree to this for it to go into effect. If in effect, here are some pros and cons for both sides.

     

    Pro: It would allow for equal pay for both sexes for doing the same job. It would allow for an amendment that allows the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1965. It would allow for to Affirmative Action to come off the books, since this says the same thing, but does away with the “quota scale” of it.

     

    Con: (for some women) it takes away the female version of the firefighters test (poundage lifting and carrying). It forces companies who are currently in the red to either cut salaries of workers to meet laws or having to spend more. Most of the things under this ERA would be under state ruling, thus congress would be infringing on states rights..

     

    What is your opinion on this issue? Should the ERA as I stated, or in its current form be passed? Or should congress stay out of State’s issues.


  5. Those teams are craptacular

     

    I miss the days of when there were plenty of 4 on 4 matches and at the end it was the Heel Survivors vs. the Face Survivors

    Um, that only did that ending one year.

     

    But they still have enough people on the roster for this, it is just that a card full of this will get boring VERY fast. See Survivor Series 87 for an example.


  6. You should NEVER Play 4-6 because that is ONLY a run defense. Stay 4-3 or 3-4. You need your CBs covering people. Or do what I do.

     

    Take the cowboys(with much free cap room), and trade for Vick and Moss. Then trade for a Seau and WIlliams, then throw a boatload of money into a good Defense Line. Moss is the fastest person in the game so Hail Mary passes from Vick(best arm in the game) is a easy touch down everytime.

     

    Or if you really want to see how much a person can score in a 5 min game. Make a CAT with a few CAWs and go hog wild. The only team I made was my old highschool, of course only allowing the points they start you off with and working with those. Then I made a complete unbeatable squad, and faced on Madden against the 85 Bears. I almost lost because they are hard to beat.


  7. Reminds me of the guy who tried to rob a 7-11 once and pulled out a gun with a cop outside the building. He saw a bag of chips he wanted and place the gun down. Then when he noticed his stupid act, the teller took the gun and pulled it on him. The guy tired to leave, but wore those LA light sneakers that blinked when he walked, so they just had to follow him by his lights. Cop cought him 3 blocks down the road when he went into a dark ally with red lights when he moved his feet.


  8. My 2 cents.

     

    1: If she has a will, pull the plug, if not, make sure something says she wants to go.

     

    2: If she is brain dead and is living off of machines, pull the plug, don't waste money and hope over a loss cause.

     

    3: All unneeded BS needs to be taken out of this and let the two parties agree to something.

     

    4: If the million is spent, why not just pull the plug, it is showing to not only be costly, but waste of time.

     

    5: Can they "kill" her humanely? Bullet to the head, CN, or anything that is quick and painless. This is just, just, wrong.


  9. Ripper, she is using it as birth control, her problem would be solved by wearing a fucking condom. The first question there is nothing to really debate with you. But she needs to learn to close her legs. Why kill off a baby because she wants to fuck around without worrying about life. She made the bed, she should sleep in it, no pun intended.


  10. This past Wednesday, my professor gave our class an assignment that was really fucked up but really thought provoking.

     

    Two questions: One for people who are pro choice, one for people who are for people who are pro life.

     

    Pro Life question: An 11 year old daughter was raped by her father and is now pregnant, she is extremely under-developed in the sense that she is in the early stages of puberty and having the kid would more than likely mean death for both parties. Should she be allowed to have an abortion? Why or why not?

     

    Pro Choice question: A 28 year old woman is pregnant and has money and time to raise a kid. She has over 600 thousand in the bank saved. She has slept with 3 people in the past week. Her main reason for getting it is because of the men was ugly. She has had an abortion on two different occasions. Should she be allowed to have yet another abortion? Why or why not?


  11. The biggest problem is alot of blacks are not like what rap music says blacks are. So it is complete utter bullshit to make a game like this. I don't care if he makes one for rednecks. This game basiclly states that blacks in the "ghettos" only care about money, bitches, rims, and guns. It is bullshit to even make a game like this. This is highly racist.

     

    The reason most whites would not get upset because there are "whites" and "rednecks". As if there are two different groups. For blacks there are "ghetto negros" and "blacks" all as one group. So Al Sharpton, Jadakiss, myself, and Bill Cosby are all grouped together when none of us are alike. It as makeing fun of one makes fun of all. That is how typecasting of races goes. This game isn't funny at all. Those who did find it funny need a check up from the neck up.

×