Narcoleptic Jumper

So you missed the part about "EVERY American presidential election has been completely rigged"? Come on. Trust me, any article that mentions the "Bilderberg group" as a world-controlling Illuminati in all seriousness is a piece of fiction. trust you? why would anybody trust you on anything, ever, let alone something like that? you know as much or less than anybody else, so don't act like you're some beacon of truth because you have a fucking opinion. anyway, the most important part of that article was the list of the people who are supporting and advising the major candidate-puppets. is that list not disconcerting to you in any way? if so, why? look at this list, and ask yourself the same question.

Every election in modern US history has been a criminal manipulation, choreographed and rigged by political elites and performed by hand-picked elite puppets, each backed by their teams of corrupt war criminals, intelligence/security “advisors” and think tank assets. The 2008 affair will be no different. It is time once again to dispel the mass insanity and unfounded hopes as another fresh election hell ensues. There will be no savior, no end to the continuing world crisis, and absolutely no “change." The monsters behind each candidate As the American public once again gets swept up into another beyond, ridiculous carnival over which “presidential personality” is most “likeable," which preselected puppet makes a better speech, etc., there is little or no attention paid to the individuals behind each candidate; the forces that are pulling the strings, and actually setting the geopolitical agenda. The Washington Post has provided a complete list of each puppet’s respective “masters," which must be studied line by line: The War Over The Wonks: A list of national security and foreign policy advisors to the leading presidential candidates from both parties This list holds the key to the central issue: war. As the names reveal, every major candidate (the favored puppets with any real chance of being selected) fronts for agendas set by current and former neoconservative and neoliberal “security” officers and politicos, members of the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations, and apparatuses such as the Heritage Foundation, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Brookings Institution, AIPAC, the Hoover Institution, the American Enterprise Institute, and others. Some of the most nightmarish individuals who walk the earth today can be found behind the candidates, as follows: John McCain * Henry Kissinger * Richard Armitage, former deputy secretary of state, covert operative and lifelong Bush ally * Robert “Bud” McFarlane, Reagan/Bush national security adviser, Iran, Contra * William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard (neocon) * Alexander Haig, Reagan/Bush secretary of state * George Shultz, Reagan/Bush secretary of state, Hoover Institution, Bechtel * Brent Scowcroft, Ford, George H.W. Bush national security adviser * James Woolsey, former CIA director * Lawrence Eagleburger, George H.W. Bush secretary of state * William Ball, Reagan administration Navy secretary * Colin Powell Barack Obama * Zbigniew Brzezinski * Anthony Lake, Clinton administration national security adviser * Sarah Sewall, Clinton administration deputy secretary of defense, counter, insurgency czar * Richard Clarke, Clinton and Bush administration counter, terrorism czar * Susan Rice, Clinton administration Africa specialist and NSC member, Brookings * Bruce Riedel, former CIA officer, NSC Near East and Asian affairs, Brookings Hillary Clinton * Bill Clinton * Madeline Albright, Clinton administration secretary of state * Sandy Berger, Clinton administration national security adviser * Richard Holbrooke, Clinton administration UN ambassador * Gen. Wesley Clark, Clinton era Kosovo commander * Leslie Gelb, Council on Foreign Relations, former State and Defense Department official * Martin Indyk, Clinton administration Israel ambassador, Brookings * Strobe Talbott, Clinton administration deputy secretary of state, co, creator of Caspian oil “6+2” group, Brookings * Jeffrey Smith, former CIA general counsel Rudy Giuliani * Kim Holmes, former George W. Bush assistant secretary of state, Heritage Foundation * Louis Freeh, former FBI director * Stephen Yates, former deputy assistant to Dick Cheney * Norman Podhoretz, Hudson Institute (neocon) * Kenneth Weinstein, Hudson Institute * Numerous individuals connected to the neocon Hoover Institution and Heritage Foundation Mike Huckabee Huckabee has been secretive about his team. Among the names floated so far: * Ed Rollins, Republican operative * Frank Gaffney, neocon * John Bolton, George W. Bush U.N. ambassador (as of this writing, Bolton’s participation is a strong rumor) John Edwards Edwards boasts a large team of career military/intelligence officers, most of whom are “rank and file." Among the more notable names: * Barry Blechman, Jimmy Carter assistant director of US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, founder and chairman of the Henry L. Stimson Center * Irving Blickstein, former assistant deputy chief of Naval operations, RAND Corporation Mitt Romney * Cofer Black, former CIA and George W. Bush state department counter, terrorism officer, vice president of Blackwater USA * Alberto Cardenas, lobbyist and former chairman of Florida Republican party * Roger Noriega, George W. Bush assistant secretary for Western hemisphere affairs * Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R, Mich.), ranking member, House Intelligence Committee The choice of the puppet masters As noted by Daniel Estulin in The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, the masters of “one world government," whose members manipulate all elections, seek the following main objectives: 1) one international identity, or “internationalism," 2) centralized control of people, 3) a zero growth, post industrial society, 3) a state of perpetual world imbalance, 4) centralized control of all foreign and domestic policies, 5) empowerment of the United Nations and NATO, and 6) Anglo, American, controlled trading bloc. While it is still too early to ascertain the final choice of the leading world-shaping groups (Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, etc.), it is clear, from the above lists, that the approved White House puppets are already the “front runners." While true representatives of “change” such as Dennis Kucinich, Cynthia McKinney and Ron Paul, stand no chance (and whose “votes” would be systematically erased in any case), the only remaining puppets, and their respective teams, are proven supplicants of the existing war and industrial elite. It goes without saying that the Republican candidates, particularly John McCain, is deeply connected to the worst elements, most prominently, Henry Kissinger. Barack Obama’s elite connection speaks for itself: Zbigniew Brzezinski. McCain’s participation in the 1980s savings and loan scandal, as a member of the infamous Keating Five, is a matter of historical fact. Also a matter of record are McCain’s brutal views on war and killing, which are best exemplified by his 2001 op, ed, War is Hell. Now Let's Get On With It. There is no better crystallization of McCain than his own blood, soaked words. It is well known that both of the Clintons are long time members of Bilderberg. As noted by Daniel Estulin, John Edwards, who currently postures as a “populist," was handpicked by Henry Kissinger (who now works behind John McCain) to be John Kerry’s vice presidential candidate in 2004. Now, four years later, his connections must have certainly increased. Here comes the “even more aggressive ‘war on terrorism’” It's clear from the chosen “candidates," there will be no end to the war, or the continuing decline of the American empire. The “war on terrorism” will not only continue but likely intensify and expand under “new management." The only question is whether the bias will be towards a neoliberal brand, , , the “more nuanced” multinational New World Order, a “bipartisan consensus” in Washington, more orderly economic and political declines, etc. . . . .or a continuation of the open brutality and criminality of Bush-Cheney. Violent events, including the assassination of Bhutto in Pakistan, and other such “9/11s," stack the deck towards the latter . . . McCain and Giuliani. The Republican candidates have uniformly and consistently echoed the Bush/Cheney/neocon war agenda and 9/11/“terrorism” lies. Huckabee, the bizarre dark horse of the Republican side, has voiced criticism of some Bush-Cheney policies, but not the “war on terrorism” in general. The Democratic candidates have each declared themselves the champion “anti-terrorist," or the “real” anti-terrorist that George W. Bush is not. Obama’s murderous views on war are well documented, and similar to those of Bush-Cheney. In addition to war on Iran, Obama has declared that he would attack Pakistan if his administration possessed “actionable intelligence” that Osama bin Laden was hiding in Pakistan, and the government there did not act. Edwards, who squealed during his 2004 vice presidential debate with Dick Cheney that he would “kill the terrorists," recently reiterated: “If I, as president, know where Osama bin Laden is, I would go get him.” Clinton went even further into details about her particular war fantasy: “At some point, probably when the missiles have launched, the Pakistani government has to know they are on the way.” In the end, McCain’s War is Hell. Now Let's Get On With It is the voice of the consensus . . . the 9/11 lie exemplified. The vote count and other illusions As noted repeatedly in this publication, every aspect of the American vote has been, and continues to be, manipulated. It is still a fact is that corporations (primarily connected to the Republican political apparatus) control the American vote, and with increasing technological sophistication: Diebold, ESS, Sequoia, and SAIC. In fact, new generations of their machines will be used in 2008. Beyond the courageous whistle-blowing and activism by the likes of Black Box Voting and others, the same democracy destroying criminal juggernaut that has been in place for generations remains in control. The winner of the 2008 election: crime As Mike Ruppert wrote in Crossing The Rubicon: “That profits of crime and war, which are destructive of human life, of labor, of happy, healthy neighborhoods (whether in the US or in Afghanistan, Africa and Iraq) are in effect a keystone of the global economy and a determinant of the success in a ruthless competition, is a compass needle for human civilization. One cannot expect to follow the recipe for roadkill stew and produce a crème brulee.” Criminals do not obey laws. Criminals do not believe in “democracy." Criminals do not “permit” elections. They will not permit an election in 2008. They will impose another one. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?con...va&aid=7766 Ron Paul, people. RON. FUCKING. PAUL.

I almost feel sorry for all the Nuggets fans after that beating last night.

how much does that really matter at this point? how fucking much? absolutely not at all, that's how much.

and I have to say, Ron Paul is a fucking american hero SIMPLY for being on this stage with these fucking clowns.

Is anyone watching this republican debate? amazing. fucking amazing.

Mike Huckabee is on Larry King with a little thing in his ear clearly being fed dialogue. you can see the deadness in his eyes! "the republican party is starting to get its groove back." guy scares the shit out of me.

Edwards, Obama, Clinton Paul, Huckabee, Romney Let's wait and see before you tell me how ridiculous I am.

You assume they actually wanted to cover up Clinton's blowjobs and that that whole fiasco wasn't a carefully planned smear campaign by the right to give them the best chance of being elected. It didn't work, apparently, so that's why they stole the election. Then what is it about? Do you honestly believe that we went over there to spread "democracy," to "liberate" the people? That's a fucking delusion, man. Tell me what this war is about if it isn’t about oil. This is all conjecture. I'm not convinced you have any idea what you're talking about. Of course, you probably would say the same thing about me, but that's okay. Where are you getting this information, out of curiosity? US oil production peaked in 1970. Iraq is currently sitting on 11% of the world’s petroleum reserves, the 2nd most in the world behind Saudi Arabia, with allegedly more possible reserves that have yet to even be properly explored. Iraq is a veritable goldmine for petroleum. They are/were also virtually defenseless, and ripe for invasion, whereas Iran is more dangerous. Not to mention that they had a tyrant leader, making it easy-as-pie to convince the American people that we were doing a good and noble thing. And are you really asking why we didn’t invade our neighboring country, our ally, and start a ground war on our own soil instead of attacking someone on the other side of the globe? Think. Good question. I can’t emphasize enough that you should read Mike Ruppert’s book. I’ll just say that from 1997 to 2000, Afghanistan was the world’s largest producer of opium. The Taliban banned opium production in late 2000 and destroyed almost all the poppies that still remained planted, so that in 2001, production of fresh opium in the country went down by an unprecedented 94%, from 3,276 tons to 185 tons, this according to UN drug control program statistics. Cut to late 2001, we invade the country, liberate a bunch of known opium warlords claiming that they would help US forces, and by the next year, Afghanistan is again numero uno, with an estimated 3700 ton crop. that figure has only increased since. I’ll leave it to you to connect the dots. Right, and in a couple of years we will be right smack in the middle of the worst recession in the country’s history and there will be no getting out of it. You may think I’m wrong, and that’s okay, but I just want you to remember me (and everyone else who is saying the exact same thing) when it does happen. Exchange rate isn’t great? It’s the worst it’s been in decades. The Canadian dollar is worth more than our dollar now. And wow, I’d sure love to hear about those way-too-complicated benefits to a multi-trillion dollar debt. And to say that the ridiculous amounts of money we’re spending on the war has nothing to do with our other economic problems is just outright insanity. It ALL has to do with the Iraq war. And who do you think is profiting off of $100 oil? Hint: it’s not Middle Eastern companies. Sure thing. Keep telling yourself that. Autopilot, thermate, and compromised security.

I said "people like you and I," meaning regular citizens. How is that condescending? Of course you probably didn't read any further than what you quoted, so whatever. That first question you posted is incredibly broad. What kind of answer are you looking for, exactly? To answer it "in detail" would take a couple hundred pages. Go read Michael Ruppert's Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil, that's 500 pages worth. I would be more than happy to answer more specific questions you may have though. They did it in order to give them excuse to launch the phony War on Terror, which is really just propaganda for treating the middle east like a gas station, where we go over and embroil the middle east in war in order to steal all of their oil, because they know that the world is running out of it, and damned if those arabs deserve any of it, because by god, we're americans and we need our oil. 9/11 did not have a "negative effect" on this country as you say--the outpouring of international support we received afterward was unprecedented. It's only after 4 years of their incredibly fucking stupid, shortsighted and arrogant plan have proven to be a total disaster that our economy is slipping quietly into a recession.

Why? Simple, to make people like you and I think that they're obviously incompetent, and incapable of pulling off an operation like 9/11. And your little tool for debunking still doesn't account for the massive amounts of gaping holes and leaps in logic and changed timelines that permeate the 9/11 Commission report, not to mention the blatant obstruction by the government of any and all independent inquiry into the events of the day, which make it obvious to anyone with an open mind that it's a cover-up. Philip Zelikow? Right, a real beacon of objectivity there. Christ, Bush originally wanted fucking Henry Kissinger to head the commission. That has to tell you something.

By all means, I won't tell you anything you don't want to hear.

I don't know, I can't really remember if I did or not. I laugh often, though, at all manner of things, so it's a good possibility. Right, whatever. I guess I'll take your word for that? I don't know what's worse though, living under an asshole, but in reasonably peaceful conditions or having a bigger asshole blowing the fuck out of your neighborhood and killing your children and destroying your city and letting criminals run wild all over the country. Okay, now I'm definitely laughing out loud. Not an empire? Really? 150 some countries around the world currently housing the American military might take issue with that. Hell, anybody who isn't seriously deluded would take issue with that. Who says we're doing "true imperialism in the old-school sense"? It's not like we're advertising the fact that we're an empire. We're low-key about it, especially to our own citizens, as you seem to be a prime example of. Empires aren't good for PR anymore. He was saying that after 9/11, it would be hard for people to not try it, "it" presumably being attacking America. That did not happen. People start attacking us OVER THERE after WE went OVER THERE started attacking THEM for a crime against us that no one has ever been punished for. No, Bush had very little (re: nothing) to do with it (like everything else about the job of presidency; he's a mouthpiece), and was possibly not even informed of it until well after the fact. Two words: plausible deniability.

god fucking dammit I wish Alex Jones didn't exist so people couldn't use his stupid ass to discredit 9/11 truth. seriously, I think he may be a government plant to do exactly that.

The Suns scored 47 points in the first quarter tonight. that's just sick

You can get super mushrooms scattered throughout the various levels which bring your life up to 6, but if your life goes down to 3 again it stays there until you get another mushroom.

lol. so you mean that absurd amount of sectarian violence in Iraq due to our imperialist invasion has nothing to do with an increase in terrorism? how many times have we been attacked since 9/11? it's not like the government allowed that to happen anyway... right?

In addition to everything LJSexay said, you should also pick up Kororinpa because it's really cheap and packed with hours of fun and satisfying marbling happiness.

No, you can't use the classic controller to play Wii games, and yes, you will enjoy playing it.

this was one of the best episodes of the season, IMO. Steve Carell needs to write more episodes. "can you smell the trees in the nature?" - one of the best lines ever

Suns are not going to get rid of Marion.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5197

http://www.gamersyde.com/stream_5006_en.html game of the motherfucking millenium. smb3 to sm64's smb? maybe.

haha they're listening to christian radio.

The Life Aquatic