Tawren

Barely Legal? Starcade 96? GREAT AMERICAN BASH 96? HAHAHAHA!

Way too many overrated matches there.

I can't wait..one more hour.

To me, its the Super X (9.3.03) show. Awesome stuff.

That would be so cool.

How the hell did it develop?

WM>Ironman>SS

robvandam420: LEARN TO FUCKING SPELL, FUCKWAD.

robvandam420, here is a question for you. A two parter, if you will. Can you spell one sentence correctly, and if so, do it.

Ha-about to see Dr. Pat get sumo-killed again. Woop.

thats the forumla of a line... are you fucking kiding me? Hey dumbass-you're wrong.

Dude, I've asked you two questions so far, and you can't even answer those.

robvandam420, what is the name of the y=mx+b formula? That is basic 8th grade math. Let's see if you can do that.

God damn that is near sig worthy. ill give just one hint..... its totally different kind of comuter. Here's a hint... And rising! if you really think im stupid then why odnt we do this.... ask me some academically related that you consider difficult and actually know the answer to, and ill do the same. tread carefully though.... you will lose. 1+1. Seriously, I doubt you can do it.

Yes, but shock tv is not what the audience wants to see anymore, they've had their fill for awhile. I wouldn't mind if WWE did a couple shock angles, as long as they backed it up with GOOD wrestling. What the WWE needs right now is balance. They can still do shock tv angles to bring in the calibre of fan who enjoys that, but they should also have more traditional feuds based on simple premises so everyone has something they want to see. And above all, if the angle is based around shock tv, make sure it is set up around GOOD wrestling. Wrestling foremost, the angles and stories should just keep things interesting inbetween matches and to set them up. Angles should not be the focus of the shows. i agree. good matches are definately important, but these days the angles are just as important imo. Your opinion sucks. Get a better one. a better one, like the one all of you share. sorry thats not an opinion, thats a cult beleif. and its wrong. these are the opinions of wade keller and such. who cant get a job with the wwe. did you ever wonder why? probably because they aren't good enough. According to your story (which we all know is BS anyways) you didn't get hired either, dumbass. i didn't get hired because i couldn't travel. if i was willing to i was going to go to stamford for an interview. didn't want to travel. and it is not bs. non of it. dont be jealous because you wish you had that talent. Yeah, I wish I had the talent not to travel.

Yes, but shock tv is not what the audience wants to see anymore, they've had their fill for awhile. I wouldn't mind if WWE did a couple shock angles, as long as they backed it up with GOOD wrestling. What the WWE needs right now is balance. They can still do shock tv angles to bring in the calibre of fan who enjoys that, but they should also have more traditional feuds based on simple premises so everyone has something they want to see. And above all, if the angle is based around shock tv, make sure it is set up around GOOD wrestling. Wrestling foremost, the angles and stories should just keep things interesting inbetween matches and to set them up. Angles should not be the focus of the shows. i agree. good matches are definately important, but these days the angles are just as important imo. Your opinion sucks. Get a better one. a better one, like the one all of you share. sorry thats not an opinion, thats a cult beleif. and its wrong. these are the opinions of wade keller and such. who cant get a job with the wwe. did you ever wonder why? probably because they aren't good enough. According to your story (which we all know is BS anyways) you didn't get hired either, dumbass.

Yes, but shock tv is not what the audience wants to see anymore, they've had their fill for awhile. I wouldn't mind if WWE did a couple shock angles, as long as they backed it up with GOOD wrestling. What the WWE needs right now is balance. They can still do shock tv angles to bring in the calibre of fan who enjoys that, but they should also have more traditional feuds based on simple premises so everyone has something they want to see. And above all, if the angle is based around shock tv, make sure it is set up around GOOD wrestling. Wrestling foremost, the angles and stories should just keep things interesting inbetween matches and to set them up. Angles should not be the focus of the shows. i agree. good matches are definately important, but these days the angles are just as important imo. Your opinion sucks. Get a better one.

What a sick wedding.

7 eps so far, plus the 1st ep was 2 hours long.

SM3 sucked ass. How the hell did it get 50 mil? And how is Kill Bill already down to 5 mil?

There are seven episodes.

Right there, you showed how fucking stupid you are. WWE isn't dead, nor is it anywhere near dead. Does it suck? Yes. Is it dead? Hell no.

You sick fuck.

Meltzer's more of a dumbass than SK, to be honest.