Jump to content
TSM Forums

Tawren

Members
  • Content count

    2744
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tawren

  1. That's nothing. Last night on Velocity, the turning point in London/Kidman vs Tajiri/Akio was Kidman tagging in London, and they even DREW AN ARROW pointing at their hands tagging. I hate DeMott.
  2. Ladykillers looks funny, can't wait to see that.
  3. And that is my problem with him. Cole, when he focuses, is excellent at that, I feel.
  4. Fuck no. Matthews is horrible.
  5. Tawren

    The OAO Velocidential Thread

    Fun fun fun exhibition there. I really liked how Chavo used the gory bomb to win instead of whatever the hell else he usually uses, I can't remember right now. Good stuff tonight.
  6. Tawren

    The OAO Velocidential Thread

    Fun match, London is crisp as hell in the ring, I tell you what. Good stuff there.
  7. Tawren

    The OAO Velocidential Thread

    This should be good.
  8. Tawren

    The OAO Velocidential Thread

    Palumbo beats Holly. Brock can barely beat Holly. Therefore, Palumbo > Brock.
  9. Tawren

    The OAO Velocidential Thread

    Why are they discussing HHH/Benoit?
  10. Cole/Tazz are so good together that I would keep them as a unit.
  11. Tawren

    New Jericho Commentary

    Remember Chris, if you don't end up liking them, DON'T VOICE YOUR OPINION. It's the best Hollywood will give you, jerky, so take up bowling if you don't like it.
  12. EDIT: nevermind, I'm thinking of the wrong match
  13. Tawren

    Brock Lesnars

    Austin could do it.
  14. Tawren

    Dream WrestleMania venues

    Agreed about the Saddledome. WWE in Calgary is usually awesome. Canadian Stampede in 97, fun house shows in 99 and 00, 5/28/01 Raw with Benoit vs Austin, SD in 02 with Edge/Angle in a cage, good house show in 03. ~!
  15. Tawren

    Dream WrestleMania venues

    McMahon Stadium here in Calgary. Fits 60 000 or so.
  16. Tawren

    The OAO Velocidential Thread

    Velocity sounds pretty swank...I'm taping.
  17. I liked the No Way Out match more, but this is still an incredible match. The heat is incredible, and HHH really tries out there, and it shows. I love the ending. HOWEVER: when compared to other hate-filled brawls such as Magnum TA vs Tully Blanchard Starcade 85, HHH/Austin at No Way Out 2001, Rock/Austin at WMX7, and even the HHH/Foley match from NWO00, which tells a far better story. Also, I really don't like Rock interfering, despite how it plays off of the Rumble 99 Foley/Rock match. ***3/4
  18. Tawren

    Benoit is 'just a transitional champion'...

    If it's done wrong, as the article suggests it will be, yeah, there are reasons to gripe. Don't be so fucking dumb.
  19. Tawren

    scott keith's wmxx review

    some kid gave this match **1/2 as there were far too many chops... I asked why so many Japan matches are held to biblical standards despite an excessive ammount of ~ELBOW SMASHES! and stiff clotheslines... The fuck? I ask again: did you read my posts? I mentioned in passing that there were many poorly done chops by Micheals, along with MANY other reasons as to why I felt the match was **1/2. My god you are stupid.
  20. Tawren

    scott keith's wmxx review

    *****, on a ***** scale, means *****/*****, meaning 5/5, meaning 100%, meaning nothing wrong, meaning perfect. OMG CONFUSING~! Hmm, so when a movie critic gives a film 4 out of 4 stars, it means its perfect? That'd be news to Roger Ebert. -=Mike 4/4, 100%, yeah, that would be perfect. Do you get 5/5 on a test when you have questions answered wrong? Has ANY match ever received ***** from you? Care to place bets on people finding faults with it? Heck, I didn't see any flaws with the WM ME --- and it had an emotional storyline to boot. -=Mike too many chops Mike... Do you even read the threads you're being a fucking idiot in?
  21. Tawren

    scott keith's wmxx review

    1) Many matches (yes, including matches in WWE and WCW) are matches I would consider *****. 2) I'm sure faults could be found. Then we'd debate them, like I tried to do here.
  22. Tawren

    scott keith's wmxx review

    *****, on a ***** scale, means *****/*****, meaning 5/5, meaning 100%, meaning nothing wrong, meaning perfect. OMG CONFUSING~! Hmm, so when a movie critic gives a film 4 out of 4 stars, it means its perfect? That'd be news to Roger Ebert. -=Mike 4/4, 100%, yeah, that would be perfect. Do you get 5/5 on a test when you have questions answered wrong?
  23. Tawren

    Starting fresh

    This is pinned, so it's not like I'm bumping a dead topic. http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...opic=51847&st=0 ^This thread is exactly what is wrong with the folder. I posted a rating of **1/2 for the WMXX three way, gave reasons, and defended my reasons for several pages, all the while being flamebaited (mainly by snuffbox, but also by hail BPS and MikeSC), and the several times I asked them to back up their opinions they make shitty "puro sucks" jokes when they brought puro up in the first place.
  24. Tawren

    scott keith's wmxx review

    *****, on a ***** scale, means *****/*****, meaning 5/5, meaning 100%, meaning nothing wrong, meaning perfect. OMG CONFUSING~!
×