USC Wuz Robbed!

Wow Starvenger. You both tied the breaker score.

If they beat OSU, they're in, but therein lies the problem, they have to beat OSU.

KC hitting that last minute FG gives me the tiebreaker in case we split the last two games. Yay!

I echo the Fuck Jacksonville statement. They have no business going to the playoffs if they lose to the fucking Houston Texans. NO BUSINESS. *mad that I might lose this week in the KKK contest*

Why? Your sig features a team that's going to lose a game or two down the stretch. Surely you don't actually believe they got a shot?

Hopefully this quiets the Chargers fans who were going "CHARGERS > BEARS BECAUSE THEY LOOK MORE COMPLETE!" Yeah so complete you turn the ball over 3 times in the 1st causing a 14-0 KC lead.

I forgot to add that if you tell your agent to work out a deal, he might work out a long but shitty $ deal. So be careful whatever you decide.

I like my matchups. I am confident enough that I think I'll be 4-2 after this week. Edit: Shouldn't have done that. Now I'm not as confident.

Well it depends on a few things: a. Do you like it in New York? b. Remember, if you walk, it's not guaranteed that the teams offering you a new deal would be teams you want to be on. c. There is a benefit in sticking around. You continue your positive reputation, whereas if you walk, you kind of stunt that. With all that said, I've never stuck with the same team for more than 1 contract period. With my new HB that I just created, I plan to though, but I know exactly where I want to be, so I already have a level of expectation from my HB's production in the system I want to be in, so I will likely be a career guy with that one team.

Ouch, that sucks Flik. I have had two machines crap out on me too. I had to give in and buy the slim. Hopefully this one survives longer than a year.

Fuck that. Women's razors are better than men's.

Admit it, Iggy. You just rank teams based on which teams lined your pockets with cash.

I'm not trying to be an ass here, but if you were to emulate a real BCS rankings, correct picks really wouldn't matter. There's a reason USC is ranked #2, despite not looking all that terrific. A win is a win, a loss is a loss. It's just weird to see a team like Temple, which has a worse overall record, make your consideration over a team like Notre Dame, or dare I say, San Diego State. But that's just me. I appreciate the work you do though.

For me, I just pick Team Nicknames for the first year, then I'd get to 4.0 GPA by studying at least once a week and spending one bye week getting tutored twice in addition to studying. Then I pick the same major for the next two years, and I can just simulate through it without losing the GPA or getting academically ineligible. The only thing that's taking long for me is the position drills, since I demand of my player to have 99 in every revelant attribute to the position.

Beating #1 Oregon State does nothing to help me in the rankings?

And if USC beats them all, there is no reason why they shouldn't be #2 or even #1.

Yep. I demand to be in the right situation, so I save my file right before the draft and keep reloading when a shit team picks me. Call me Eli Manning if you want. I'm currently doing a HB in NCAA, with the intent of moving him to Madden when he goes pro.

The Cardinals will win.

I upset #1 Oregon State. Good thing Leena quit, eh?

I get that, but still, this is a forum. It should be expected that by this point, people are going to want to discuss the movie. To me, it's like going into the Raw thread a hour into the show and complaining because people are discussing what's going on during the show, "BUT IM ON THE WEST COAST! DONT SPOIL IT!"

Why would people go in a movie thread if they didn't want to be spoiled? Never made sense to me.

a game between Chicago's bastard stepchild that the city of Chicago never cared enough about aside from a couple weeks last october and Houston, a franchise with zero national appeal and unlikable players. Oh go fuck your cousin. But he's right! There isn't a big disparity between 2.9 and 3.1, but there's a big disparity between 66 and 90, or 5th place and world champions. Where were the fans when the Sox were only above-average? It only took a world championship to get asses in the seats. Yeah, damn the fair weather fans of the White Sox fanbase, whatever exists of it. I still just wanted to throw in the obligatory Choken reference. I do have to begrudgingly admit the Cubs has the city wrapped around their fingers while the White Sox are begging for table scraps, so to speak.

To bring some civility to the argument, the White Sox drew 2.9 million, good for 3rd in the AL. Cubs drew 3.1 million. Not much of a disparity.

Pfft... Leena doesn't want to lose to me so she quit. How convenient .

a game between Chicago's bastard stepchild that the city of Chicago never cared enough about aside from a couple weeks last october and Houston, a franchise with zero national appeal and unlikable players. Oh go fuck your cousin.