USC Wuz Robbed!

Ok thanks for clarifying.

So to be clear, this is a permanent ban? Dama will want to know... (since he was under the impression his ban lasts until Friday morning.)

Dama IM'd me last night to check for him IK Cool Jew's status. He thinks he should be banned too.

I was waiting for that. Good deal. Now everyone can move on.

I'd have loved to see a Chicago vs Atlanta game this season, but alas they don't meet in the regular season.

Btw, after how the show opened, I hope I see more Wes Mendell. The character's gold.

At least your record reflects the actual team's.

And the Falcons play any differently.... how?

*raises hand* I would. Until someone figures out how to get them off the field. offensively. The Bears did a pretty good job of that last year vs the Falcons.

Not quite impressive, but it is a good sign, because if they are a "playoff" contender (too early to tell, I know) they should be beating the likes of Raiders and Browns and etc that easily.

Dallas makes the tiebreaker a moot point.

Which ties them for 2nd so far in points allowed, (tied with Bears) and behind Baltimore (6 points allowed).

I win, I think, since I get the tiebreaker anyways.

I'm thinking more Bears vs Chargers.

Agreed.

The one time I trust OU, they blow it... well them and the refs.

Maybe that's what gets them going these days?

You must not be a real USC-hater. I would love to see this. Anything that hurts, tarnishes, or ruins USC is a great event for any Bruins fan. If you grew up in or near the LA area you'd understand why we hate them, as well. Also hate UMiami kids as badly as the USC ones for much the same reason. Stupid private school douchebags. Anyways though, what's the worse that can really happen to Bush in this matter? I'm sure he couldn't give a fuck at this point.

What's there not to understand? You can't really crown a real champion when some years you'd have a few teams finishing with undefeated records. What makes one undefeated team a champion over another? They're just hedging their bets and letting the "people" (read: computers and media) choose.

No, VX and Dama, the "best player" thing is an opinion-based question. If Bush lost his Heisman, it'd likely go to Vince Young. Really, both are interchangable in their impact (well, VY meant more to his team, but Bush was the more explosive player I think.)

I think the AP side of the title would be safe, not sure about the actual BCS side.

If it were me, I'd strap him like a drunken daddy strapping a 8 year old boy who spilt his drink.

Then we go back into 1997.

Huh? He wasn't that good in San Diego, a pitching park. How is he going to be any better in a hitter's park?

Not only do I agree with you on this, but I don't think he should lose at Wrestlemania. There are very few truly special things in wrestling anymore, and this is one of them. The only reason Taker should lose is if Taker himself is basically demanding that he put someone over, and I don't see that happening. I'm all for Benoit/Taker, but Taker should win. The problem is that the wrestling business is not about winning streaks. When you build something up so much like his streak. It's going to be a natural (and in my opinion, the correct) thing to do is to pay it off by having someone end it. Goldberg's streak had to end sometime, and if used on the right guy, it would have gotten the guy over. It just happened to be Kevin Nash. Taker's streak needs to end.