USC Wuz Robbed!

Once again I'm like the only guy who picked Chicago. Well like last week, Chicago will help me win this week.

There IS a difference between working a great match and just jumping around. AJ is not as bad as some indy workers by any stretch of imagination, but AJ is quite overrated by the IWC. I'm glad Tim said it.

Which is why I decided to break down Fishyswa's post. The quote tags weren't working for some reason. Anyways I'm sick of this debate. Have fun Fishyswa and whoever has the misfortune of trying to debate him.

Thank you for admitting it. Now that wasn't so hard, was it?

Judging by the people who got busted this year, watch it be Jay Gibbons.

No.

Too bad he has nothing whatsoever to do with the creative team.

Fine I will only pick apart one post of yours since I don't have the time to do every one of yours. After this, I'm going to pull out of this silly debate because as I've said, you lost and this debate really has no business continuing. He gets reactions, but none are the kind he is trying to get. The following reactions he incurs are: Sits on hands, Change the channel, Stare at him blankly, weak boos due to him feuding with fan faves (too weak to be considered over). You don't know what X-Pac heat? Ok I'll explain it. Once upon a time there was a man named Sean Waltman. He had returned to WWF after a stint with WCW. His name in the ring was "X-Pac". Following? Ok. Now initially X-Pac received favorable reactions as due mostly to his affliation to the new faction called DeGeneration X. Now when DX had disbanded, X-Pac tried a hand at a singles career. As time worn on and as X-Pac was featured in angles where he really had no business being part of (the feud with Jericho comes to mind), he started receiving reactions that were less favorable. The reactions continued to the point that people just hated X-Pac, and not in the good way. You want good heel heat? Look at Hunter's. That's the right kind of heel heat. And if you can't distinguish the differences between those reactions... well I dunno what to say. Well how about YOU provide evidence of the person being wrong? All you've been telling us is "Prove it! Bah!" when you can't do the same yourself? Ok. Hey you're onto something. Oh nah you're not. If the only reactions that Masters can get is because of the faces, then clearly that proves us right that he isn't over to get his OWN reactions, I would think. Once again, forcing other people to do things for you because you can't be bothered to do it yourself. And no, the goal wasn't simply to be a heel. It was for him to be among the top heels on Raw. Push-wise, goal accomplished. Overness-wise? FAILURE. There's a difference between WWE experience and TV experience. He says WWE experience and you say TV. Looks like you two are on totally different pages. His likely the right one. Nothing to refute here. Moving on... Umm yeah I change the channel if Masters comes on. So I personally prove you wrong with that one. Hunter, as much as people hate him, gets the right reactions for a heel. He is over correctly as a heel. Where are those "asshole" chants for Masters? People are not supposed to like heels, correct. They are, however, supposed to REACT to them. And not in the way of "Ohh ugh he's on. What's on ABC tonight?" The man speaks the truth. Not very clever, no, but truth nonetheless. Once again.... making other people do the work? Ok see why you lost? In a debate you're supposed to do 50% of the work. If you're not willing to do that, the opponent won't either. Then it all becomes a repetitive debate shooting half-truths and outright false misconceptions out of your ass. No comment.

It gets you to shut up because the debate is going nowhere. You're not going to change your mind. You're just going to keep countering everyone's valid points with stupid comments that has very little to no bearing on the facts pertaining to the matter.

And what exactly do YOU have to add to it besides misconceptions and clueless rantings?

Still on this, Fishyswa? Just drop it, you lost. Get over it.

Heh only AFC West boasts more than 1 2-0 teams.

Heidenreich wasn't even used in OVW in the first place. Cornette kept him off OVW TV because he knew that Heidenreich was woefully lacking in the talent department. WWE called him up regardless and way too soon. Heidenreich's lack of talent is not OVW's fault. Nor is it OVW's fault that WWE seem to have the tendency to saddle the OVW talents with gimmicks that are either going to damage their careers (Hassan) or gimmicks that hide their strengths and expose their flaws (Matt Morgan and pretty much everyone else). And yes WWE does tell OVW and Cornette to fuck off when he tells them they aren't ready. Shows what you know, eh Fishy?

Not to mention his Rock-like mic skills as showcased by his poetry readings.

Won't happen. They probably think the whole country loves and wants to watch ND. They are the faces of college football after all! (Yes I was sarcastic)

Even if Stevie Richards is injury-prone it is the other wrestlers' jobs to make sure that they work safely as to prevent an injury. Novel concept, I know!

Re: Deacon Batista, could it have anything to do with the fact he was saddled with a bad gimmick in the first place? Well outside Steven Richards, I don't recall Masters injuring anyone else. The rest I agree with.

Eh my method is better. Nothing funnier than seeing 3 men just look on while you climb out scotfree.

Since I get USC, I dont mind having the ND game on afterwards.

Yes they are on the West coast. Bones is on 8 pm and ends at 9 pm while My Name is Earl is on 8:30 pm. edit: Sorry you're correct, however House is on then, which my wife loves, so no Earl for me.

I'd like to watch it but Bones takes priority.

None but I do like the silhouette picture of Edge in a few of those shirts.

I notice that if you beat on a wrestler long enough he'd just stand there and stare. Do that to everyone and you'd be able to climb out without people bothering you.

Yes. Use the same button you would for the Truck Stick and Hit Stick.

Tell me about it. I'd be like 24/24 for 350 yards and 4 TDs then in the last quarter all of sudden I'd be 24/50 for 400 yards and 4 TDs and 2 INTs.