USC Wuz Robbed!

Juice did a good job, but let's not get crazy here. Ohio State should still be in the running, since their only loss is to a good Illinois team as compared to Oregon's loss to Cal and LSU's loss to Kentucky and Oklahoma's loss to Colorado. Ohio State should not fall any further than #4, and could still sneak in the title game. Edit: Ok I forgot about Kansas. If Kansas wins tonight, then I expect Ohio State to get no worse than the #5 spot.

When I said obvious, I meant the actual puzzle.

The difference is TNA is not big-time enough that more people would check it out. The ONE person who did saw it and immediately knew what it meant. Not to mention all those "promos" to hype the partner and everyone going "Booker". Fact is, this was a terrible "campaign" and they're better off just telling people who it is. Not like they built up a good enough base that people would order on faith that they'll deliver (only Angle and Cage comes to mind as good "surprises").

How is it subtle? It's more obvious who they are hinting at than the SaveUs_222 promos.

This is why I prefer going through NCAA to create a player for Superstar. Otherwise you come in like crappy undrafted rookie type player.

Works for me. Thanks.

Well theoretically, neither would Michigan if they lose the last two games. They're ranked 12th now, if they lose to Wisconsin, they'll probably fall to around 18 or worse, and then Ohio State would send them into the 20's or out of the top 25.

If Wisconsin beats Michigan and Michigan loses to OSU, then I don't see why the Rose Bowl wouldn't invite Wisconsin instead, especially if Oregon is their Pac-10 representative.

If they beat Ohio State next week they'd win the conference by tiebreak, thus they control their own destiny. A loss here would only officially kill any BCS at large hopes they had which were already slim. We still have a chance for quite possibly the most undesirable bowl rematch ever in a Oregon/Michigan Rose Bowl. Is it possible for the Rose to refuse to take Michigan?

How the hell do they control their destiny? I'd think stockpiling conference wins would help that than losing them.

Why should they? They have the leverage. They can run game and reality shows instead, and it's not like other networks would steal viewers (since they'd be running the same kind of shows themselves). The writers would be the ones losing money and if it goes on too long, their jobs on any specific shows they work on (for example, if the strike goes on too long, I don't see a newcomer show like Reaper or Life or etc regaining their momentum).

What did you hear about Noah?

Granted I only see the score on Sportsline, which doesn't update as often as I'd like, but if they are right, 17 point lead is not really "running up the score".

Well I think I misphrased. Yes it can be proved, but I think judges are very leery on ruling on pro wrestling cases where the world is so insular that it's hard to prove whether a case is legitimate or "worked". But I guess if a judge was willing to take everything as it is, it can be easily proved.

He can't actually prove that the finish that they did wasn't the one agreed upon on. Yes even the Wrestling with Shadows video could be picked apart by good lawyers.

Easy, if you have this really really really busy stretch in your life and you just drink water because you don't have time to go get food, so you end up replacing hunger with drinking water, and then by the time you realize it, you haven't had eaten in days. I read in an article once somewhere that most of the time when people think they are hungry, they are in reality just thirsty. So I guess when I got "hungry" during then, it was really just thirst or something.

3.8.

Also because Bret liked The Rock and refused to just squash him when he was starting to gain steam, like HHH & HBK wanted. So HHH hates Bret because he had the audacity to see the bullshit they were trying to pull on The Rock.

Did they ever explain WHY Crews is investigating the Bank of Los Angeles shootout? Does it have a connection to his being framed for the murders?

Yes, it's just a poster but it'd still be quite a sight. Going through the ring would just be for dramatic effect. I'm still waiting for that dragon from the No Mercy 06 poster.

Sounds like you need to do less walkin' and more eatin', dude. That's probably true. I used to eat a lot, and I never gained much weight (due to some sort of accelerated metabolism as a result of a weakened lung), so I figured what's the point. Might as well be a lean 140 than a flabby 140.

I'm thin too (145 pounds as a 6'2") and I don't lose 15 pounds missing meals either. And I've gone days without eating (only drinking water), and the most I'd lose is 5.

I DO think Crews sort of dwells on the Bank of Los Angeles shootout too much. It makes him look obsessed, which isn't a good thing when his captain is looking for an excuse to kick him off.

No. It's fine to be happy if someone you don't like is gone, but what you said was a bit childish. If that doesn't make sense to you, I don't know what to tell you.

I'll also like to say Cyber Mark Madden is full of shit with that statement. You cannot lose 15 pounds by missing one meal. 1-5 maybe, 15? No.