Brett Favre

The reason for the balk was because of the double steal.

It's not that horrible. Jeter is an okay shortstop, not a bad one. And A-Rod was a good 3rd baseman before going into a mental funk. And since when can't Damon rundown balls? If anything, thats what he does.

Jeters never played center in his life, so no, it's not that simple. He's not fucking Robin Yount here.

No but they go when they win, and they don't show up when they lose. It's not just a "Yankee" thing. And Met fans were booing the shit out of Beltran nearly all of last year and the first part of this year. It's not like they don't boo anybody either.

..like every other team in Sports? Sorta how the Mets brought no one to the stadium the past few years, and all of a sudden Pedro is here and everyone is fan? Like that. 1 out of 5 isn't most.

Some? Yes. Most? No.

What does Cano play?

Well what you prefer, a bad 3rd baseman and a good shortstop, or a good 3rd baseman, and a decent shortstop? It's not that big of a deal.

What song are they playing?

He played a great third base last year. It's mental.

I hope he doesn't become Chuck Knoblauch.

Go Saints.

Whats this generalization about Yankee fans hating A-Rod. Any fan who goes to games will tell you that its like 1 out of every 5 people in the stadium who boo him, and we all know most of them aren't even real Yankee fans; the loyal fans usually can't even afford to go to the stadium. But keep buying into the media, if it makes you feel better. Theres no way in hell I trade A-Rod for anybody.

I did say well. Not good either. But well. The two starts before that were good, and that other one was good, but overall he's pitched well. Eh, whatever.

It's alright. Thats why I said well. He got into the 6th, giving up 3 runs, that isn't bad at all. If thats what you're arguing so you can say you're right, then thats sad.

My bad, he's had 4 out of 5 good starts. Check the two before those.

Those three good starts were his past 3. So yeah, he was pitching well.

You guys are worse than the media; ignoring A-Rod's 3 run bomb. Jaret Wright was pitching well before this start.

The sooner the better.

Nash has had two straight years with over 800 assists. You're telling me in that offense, that he won't be able to rack up over 800 assists for the next four years? You don't lose the ability to pass when you get older. That's 3200 assists right there, putting him past Hardaway and Strickland. Hardaway and Jackson are two guys you can argue for, for the top 100. We're talking 100 players over here. Not 10, not 5. 100. It's silly to think that Nash can't crack the top 100. Now, between all three guys, they have 6 all-stars, 1 All-NBA Team, 4 2nd all NBA Teams, and 1 3rd All-NBA Team. In the prime of his career, Steve Nash has 4 all-stars, 2 All-NBA Teams, and 2 All-NBA 3rd Teams, not to mention two MVP Awards. He's already had a better career than Mark Jackson and Rod Strickland (they played 17 seasons, Nash is in his 10th), and you can make an argument that he's already had a better career than Tim Hardaway with the MVP Awards. Without the MVP Awards, Hardaway had a better career, AS OF NOW. Nash had his two best seasons these past two years. So it's not like he's declining.

You're just pissed that he did win them. You can't change what already happened. He's a two time MVP, get over it. Because of that, he's definitely in the top 100. I don't know if he's in the top 50, I wasn't arguing that. Maybe you can make a case for it, and against it, but it's not what i'm trying to debate here. And those guys were picked by the TNT people. It's nothing official. Steve Nash has already had his two best seasons in the NBA after the age of 30, so who are you to say that he won't have an all-time career? His prime has been different from mostly everyone else's. And it's not like he sucked ass before. He was an all-star before coming to Phoenix, and now he's an All-NBAer. Who are you to say that he can't keep it up for a few more years?

Yeah he hasn't, but that's not what i'm arguing. I'm just arguing that he's Top 100 of all time.

John Stockton is 13 and 10. 13 and 7, great FG%, great FT%, numerous All-NBA Teams, multiple time All-Star, and a two time MVP award winner should put him in the top 100. And enough with the cases that he didn't deserve them. If we're going to do that, lets do it for every single player in NBA History. He won them. End of story.

You can definitely put him in the top 100 of all time; he's already good enough to be a top 10 PG of all time. His career numbers are 13 and 7, very good FG%, one of the best all time FT%, 2 time All-NBA Third Team, 2 time All-NBA First Team, 2 time MVP, and a 4 time All-Star. He's had 6 straight all-star type years; his first few years bring his numbers down. Compared to Lenny Wilkens, a Hall of Famer, who put up 16 and 7, was a one time MVP, and a 9 time All-Star. Steve Nash is easily in the top 100 of all time.

Johnny Depp can play anybody. He'd play Joker really well, but it's always better to get someone a little less known. Heath Ledger, I don't know too much about. As for Harvey Dent, I know someone a while ago suggested Billy Zane, and I think thats a perfect choice.