Brett Favre

I'm a Jet fan there buddy.

It's going to be the battle of the brothers this year. There I said it.

By the way, no White America, Till I Collapse, Marshall Mathers, My Dad's Gone Crazy (for the last verse), or even Rockbottom in the tracklist. Horrible.

Please don't put "The Real Slim Shady" in the same category as "Ass Like That". As far as pop songs go, "The Real Slim Shady" was a pretty good one.

Against the offensive juggernaut that is Tampa Bay.

The Patriot defense better than the Colts? This is the 2005 Patriots. They'd be lucky to beat the Bengals.

Cano has a higher OPS than Polanco and Castillo, and while he doesn't walk much, he doesn't strike out much either. He's not a bad 2nd basemen, and was also a very good prospect coming up. I think you can make a case for him.

He should have played for la Republica Dominicana. SS: Tejada 3B: A-Rod 1B: Pujols RF: Guerrero LF: Ramirez DH: Ortiz 2B: Cano The rest doesn't matter.

I agree; Kidd is my favorite player in the NBA, he's a different case. Anyone else (the Bibby, Billups types), would have done no better than Marbury.

Hmmm. I voted like a month into the season or so, and had Kobe, Allen, McGrady, KG, and Camby, and James, Iverson, Wade, Artest, and Curry. Some of them deserve it. Rendclaw, it's his career high. NBA.com.

What a loser forum.

Saturday Games Tampa Bay at New England (4.5) Kansas City at N.Y. Giants (3.5) (9.5) Denver at Buffalo Sunday/Monday Games (1.5) Arizona at Houston (8.5) Carolina at New Orleans Dallas at Washington (2.5) N.Y. Jets at Miami (8.5) (3.5) Pittsburgh at Minnesota San Diego at Indianapolis (7.5) (7.5) Seattle at Tennessee San Francisco at Jacksonville (15.5) (7.5) Cincinnati at Detroit Cleveland at Oakland (3.5) (3.5) Philadelphia at St. Louis Atlanta at Chicago (3.5) Green Bay at Baltimore (3.5) Arizona - 17 Vote for Option B.

Marbury had a 20 assist game.

No, Marbury's actually made the playoffs, and has had winning seasons. I don't think SAR has had a winning season.

I was choosing by who plays PG, I guess with the exception of Iverson. Arenas is the real deal, he does both fine. And yeah, I was thinking of what Bibby's done in the past as well, he also has a crappy team out in Sacramento right now.

1. Kidd 2. Nash 3. Arenas 4. Billups 5. Bibby 6. Marbury 7. Davis 8. Hinrich 9. Parker 10. Ford Something like that....could be top 5, definitely top 10.

I'm not saying Marbury is a superstar, but he's no slouch either. He's an all-star, in the 2nd layer of stars in the NBA, and yes, would need to play along side a superstar. Although like I said, so do T-Mac, and Kobe. They can't do it on their own either.

Billups was a real star before Detroit. Before being surrounded by the league's best mid ranger shooter, the league's top frontcourt defender, the league's best post defender and screener, and the league's toughest matchup. Yep. Tell me, what teams was Marbury on that could have won a playoff series? The only playoff series he ALMOST won was against the fucking San Antonio Spurs with a rookie Amare, Marion, and Penny Hardaway. And the Suns still won 2 games in that series. With the Nets he had an injured K-Mart, and KVH. Now, I happen to think Kidd is the best point guard in the NBA, but he still had the luxury of playing with Jefferson, and a reliable center. If you knew Marbury's game, you'd know that these past 3 years, he's turn the ball over far less than the beginning of his career. He's had one of the better assist to turnover ratios in the league. He also sets up shooters very well. Better than Ridnour, which is a reason why he made Kurt Thomas look so good (who now looks like crap in Phoenix). I'm not saying he's at the level of LBJ or T-Mac, although seriously, have they won playoff series? Has Kobe won a playoff series with Shaq? I don't think so. And seriously, anyone playing with Tim Duncan would look pretty good, don't you think?

I had no idea Artest had no baggage, and gave Indy leverage with his comments. You make it sound like he would get traded for fucking LeBron James. I'm pretty sure that if a trade were to happen between the Knicks and Pacers, it would be something like Davis, Lee, and Ariza (maybe Q) for Artest and some bad contract; but if this was offered, I think there's a small chance it goes through because Tinsley's contract is longer than Marbury's, and he seems to be falling out of place in Indy. Marbury would suck ass in Europe (you watched the Olympics, didn't you?), but he needs a strong shooting team to be effective. He would be perfect in Seattle. Only narrow minded people would say that he doesn't fit anywhere. Almost every star player in the league needs the ball to be effective, with a few exceptions (Duncan and KG). To get assists, you need to have the ball in your hand, and the Kobes, and LeBrons, and the T-Macs all need the ball in their hands to be effective.

I'd like that trade for the Knicks. Jamaal Tinsley is very much a Larry Brown type point guard, and Artest would fit perfectly at the 3. The Pacers could be even more dangerous with that trade as well. Marbury just doesn't fit here anymore, and I think he'll be even better with Jermaine O'Neal.

They free up some money for Manny by trading Benson with Beltran. Will Milledge be brought up if this happens?

Great trade for Boston, alright trade for the Mets, eh trade for Texas (they do need a starter though).

Crawford's been playing under control this year. I like the direction he's going in this year. He actually tries on defense too now.

The Knicks will probably give up Q, Lee and Ariza. They can give up Antonio Davis too if they want to get rid of Croshere's contract, and that's pretty much what Walsh is looking for. Future players and financial flexibility. They get that in Lee and Ariza, and with the expiring in Davis. They also get a decent player back in Q.

That's just weird. And creepy.