-
Content count
2292 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by k thx
-
Brain, apparently. Though they may be one and the same...
-
I'm guessing that a fair few posters on the WWE board are there to wind up the rest. For example, whoever it is that defends Randy Orton to the death. Is it Besus? HD should invade WWE
-
Quiet you. You'll ruin the marketing strategy of the show! And that would be a pisstake. hehehehe
-
It really wouldn't surprise me to see him return, but only if he gets promised a push, or at least a spot on TV.
-
Transexual Swedish Barmaid Gangbang? I love that movie! And the DVD extras are great. You get to see the operations!
-
I'd say we just have a proffesional relationship. He always pays for it. And I get 90% of it. 90% of the money or the "it"?
-
I'd say we just have a proffesional relationship. He always pays for it.
-
So you're Chave III, Scientist? You might have to talk with Dave O'Neill about copyright to the "occupation in the username" gimmick. Nah. It's gonna be "chave II: wrath of chave" When I can get annother name, I might start up a thread for suggestions.
-
I hardly see anything bannable about posting "Polkaroo" randomly, and he didn't even show up that often to be an annoyance (not like other gimmick posters we all know and dislike) Yeah, but it's still a banable offence. I don't think he was banned for it, but he could be. Hardly I bet most everyone else in this thread could come up with 10 posters that should be banned before Polkaroo sigh Look at the post I was replying to. It said that Polkaroo didn't do anything remotely banworthy. I pointed out he broke rule one on Hardcore Discussion. I don't think for one second he was banned for it, but he did break that rule, and could have been banned for it. Now, I want you to give me 10 posters that should be banned before Polkaroo. Along with reasons why they have broken more rules than Polkaroo. Not the same amount of rules, but more rules. Please enlighten me, oh great one.
-
Jim Ross? The man who thought Nathan Jones was producing?
-
I hardly see anything bannable about posting "Polkaroo" randomly, and he didn't even show up that often to be an annoyance (not like other gimmick posters we all know and dislike) Yeah, but it's still a banable offence. I don't think he was banned for it, but he could be.
-
Apart from breaking the rules, of course. Zuh?
-
If Michaels had that much pull, Spanky, London and Danielson would all be Smackdown regulars.
-
I just had to read over the stuff I missed backwards. My head hurts. Also, the egg came before the chicken. Trust me, I'm a scientist.
-
Post here if you're an anonymous member.
k thx replied to Giuseppe Zangara's topic in No Holds Barred
You dony have to log out if your not anonymous, dude... -
He admitted being a post whore! OMG BANPLZ~!
-
Apart from breaking the rules, of course.
-
And the face tag teams on Smackdown is reduced to The APA and 2Cool. Yay.
-
You really should have changed your name to "Squirtanetic".
-
It may be sick, but you've gotta admire the aim of that guy in the big pic at the bottom...
-
And I said LINK IT! LINK IT! LINK IT!
-
From my experiments as RoyalBlue, I can safely say that people treat you differently if you're a n00b. I got shit for posting the same stuff as i would as chave. Eradicating post counts would at least eradicate all the "shut up n00b" shit. Although, having said that, I have got annother new posting name accepted and reasonably established in HD in under 100 posts.
-
Red X boy loves lumberjacks.
-
LINK IT! LINK IT! LINK IT!