EricMM

THE TAX CUTS SAVED MONEY!

w00t w00t http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Tourneyfag

Marvin I assure you there is more to this process than shining sunlight onto CO2 somehow. But I'm kind of sick of doing this right now.

But Iraq was good for the terrorists. It got us out of Afghanistan and gave them new places to play in Iraq. Can't get over that shit...

So, any chance of an Impeachment call if Bush actually tries to move troops into Iran? I mean, seriously.

... Turning CO2 into CO is not a solution to our energy problems.

So ACTUALLY Obama won TX.

Marvin you are an idiot. Who gives a shit whether you turn the coal into gasoline or natural gas? The carbon is in the coal, it has to go someplace. Yes, turning it into natural gas and then burning it will cause less sulfur to go into the atmosphere and reduce acid rain. But comparing acid rain to global warming is like comparing an M-80 to a Daisy Cutter, at least when it comes to potential impact and DIFFICULTY TO PREVENT. How about another one, wise guy? The only advantage coal has over anything else is price. THAT'S IT. It is one of the most polluting things we can do as a country. Don't worry, the Canadian Tar Sands may come for the title, but either way they're both absolutely disgusting. They put HUGE amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere every year, along with sulfur, mercury, and particulate matter. The more work you put into getting the pollution out of coal, the less valuable it is. When you take into consideration the economic damage that will either be caused by global warming or (HOPEFULLY) preventing and undoing global warming, coal's costs skyrocket. Do you know how hard it is to trap a gas underground? This is not like radioactive rods which hopefully stay put. This is a MASSIVE amount of gas. Thousands and thousands and thousands of tons of gas. And you are unwilling to work at energy solutions that have NONE of these side effects because your energy bill might go up as much as 50%. Yes, we need to work on our energy storing technologies. Absolutely. But I nominate that it will be easier to do so than it will be to store the carbon gas that we produce in the ground, and keep it there. Meanwhile, Czech is lol'ing, oh Eric, there he goes again. Whatever. This is a concrete and scientific undebated issue that has only the basest political hacks still arguing against it. But you have people so convinced that wind power is somehow going to be worse for them than coal is (did you see the movie smitty posted?) or oil is (did you see 9/11? Iraq war?) And they cannot appreciate how a decentralized DOMESTIC source of energy that does NOT cause asthma, does not cause global warming, and will not be ever increasing in price is a good thing!

@ Mario and Toadstool standing in their traditional places as the two Fire Emblem guys get whacked by old skool DK.

Oh yeah, get ME to go down into rural Maryland. As far as I'm concerned, MD has only three counties, Montgomery, Prince Georges, and Washington D.C.

This cannot be posted enough:

The waterview is not marred in any appreciable way. Coal kills more birds than turbines. And if wind got the subsidies that coal got from the government it would be a much closer thing. Plus the uncounted external costs of pollution. Which you're not counting. Because you're dumb.

I don't think you can understate that enough, if the SD's overturn the popular vote, it will completely disillusion everyone in the party under 35, I swear it.

Oh we surely could by 2050. Shit, there's renewable energy in MD counting offshore wind and solar to power most of MD. If we build it, it will come.

PRAY. FOR. MOJO.

Well I'm sure the banks would rather get the regular payment on time than foreclose, but if its between foreclosure or nothing, I know which the banks will take...

Preventing foreclosures doesn't help the *banks* at all...

You appreciate, then, that a movie with no audio in space for any extended period of time would be a WORSE movie because of it, same here.

You dick!

Truth.

Glenn Beck ( ) didn't say that so it must not be true. I hereby accuse Marvin of trolling, at this point. He's passed the line.

I just don't think the market is there for Blu-Ray OR HD-DVD or anything like that. After all, even the discs themselves cost more...

You're so STUPID!![/Asian guy from UHF]

Trading in two games worth $49.99 for what $40 in credit? Splendid... Its not even like you're getting money for the trade in. Why would you even mention this Gamestop shit.

This isn't like the eighteenth or nineteenth centuries. Even the most well-armed American can't stand up to the American army.