foleyfanforever88

I'm sure that WWE will take that into deep consideration after those shows earn them way too many dollars. Obviously there aren't too many PPV's from their standpoint; I meant from a fan's standpoint. How do you expect the PPV to sell, if the stars are not on it? There will be stars on every Pay Per View. I just think its stupid to load up every single one with the 15 biggest stars and not let anybody else ever get a match. I mean, look at who they have that could be in major matches: Cena Orton Batista JBL Undertaker Edge HBK Jericho Triple H MVP Big Show Kane Jeff Hardy Umaga Kennedy Matt Hardy Finlay CM Punk That's 18 guys right there that could all be in very hyped, main event level matches this year..do they really all need to be on every pay per view? I think it would be better to have 9 or 10 of them, along with 9 or 10 midcard guys on each show, rather than trying to build up a match for every one of them within 4 (or even as little as 2) weeks.

It wouldn't be the first time someone has gotten fired just as things were starting to get better for them. Plus, it's ECW. On a completely different note: The WWE has way too many pay per views. In a couple months, we are going to have three over a course of 6 weeks. Personally (and I think we all agree), I think there should be 10, maybe 11 pay per views each year. It would allow for longer build-ups and therefore make the shows more appealing, I think. However, it doesn't look like the WWE wants to cut down at all in regards to the PPV schedule. So, if there has to be 14 or 15 pay per views each year, I think they should stop overloading the shows with major matches and start having feuds end on an every other month schedule. In other words, most of the major superstars would only appear on every other pay per view so that their matches could be hyped for longer periods of time. This would also decrease the number of matches that get repeated 2 or 3 times a year on PPV (for example, Edge vs Batista from last year). Another result of this change would be that more mid-card wrestlers would get to have matches on PPV. For example, Backlash could have had the following card: Orton vs Cena vs JBL vs Triple H Big Show vs Khali Carlito/Santino vs Rhodes/Holly Divas Tag Match Kane vs Chavo Finlay vs Palumbo (gives them something to do) Jericho vs Umaga And then Judgment Day(?) could be: Edge vs Undertaker Miz/Morrison vs Jesse/Festus MVP vs Matt Hardy Regal vs Jeff Hardy HBK vs Batista Mickie James vs Beth Pheonix Kennedy vs Punk (for MITB) ..or something like that. It might not make as much money for the WWE initially, but I think having feuds be built up over 2 months rather than one would make PPV matches more important and exciting. We can only see so many combinations of Triple H, Cena, and Orton for the WWE Title, so having only 6-8 WWE Title matches a year rather than 12+ solves the problem of repetition (and the "who cares?" attitude that comes along with it). Thoughts?

So was Balls Mahoney. We may need a new thread on this one. Um..no? Neither one of those guys meant anything at all. If a mass firing begins, then sure, make a thread. But for Balls and Taylor? It's just not worth it. If Mike Knox and Snitsky both make it through cuts, I'll be shocked (and pissed).

Yes, I've actually been using Rosalina most of the time.

I think it's you that sucks.. I've been playing this game for the past 6-7 hours and I'm having a ton of fun. I beat every cup on 50cc and then I started playing online. My biggest accomplishment so far is beating one of two asians in a 10 or 11 person race. It was awesome. Favorite new levels: DK Summit Rainbow Road Wario Goldmine Coconut Mall Koopa Cape

Is the Fatal Four Way over yet?

I'd like to second Vader being on the list. Hell, he was in an episode of Boy Meets World.

I started expecting Taker-Edge at WM24 sometime between 22 and 23. I also predicted HBK-Flair around that time, but initially for 23.

Can anybody see TBS busting out the moonsault to put Khali away?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ese06aBkW_A&feature=related Listen to the reaction for Kane..I really really hope he gets a World (or WWE) Title reign before he retires, but I'm not getting my hopes up.

Toby putting his hand on Pam's leg and then jumping the fence and running home was awkward as hell, but hilarious.

Cartman and Butters hanging over the street light attached by each other's hands was great. "Lame."

It really may end up being the greatest video game system of all time.

I wouldn't say I loved the movie in theaters, but I'm having the same issues in regards to buying it on DVD. In the end, I probably won't, just because I may like the movie less on a regular sized screen. Seeing it in the theater really made it more enjoyable.

And we do not like you. I guess just calling it Nintendo is better than using the exclamation points, though.

Good ending to Raw. Good show all around, got better as it went.

I just thought it would be easier for you to avoid the thread then for one of us to spoil tag half of the posts in this thread and make it retarded for the rest of us to read.

How about you just don't read the RAW thread if you haven't seen it yet.

Because Cena, Kane, and Taker would run out to save him and there would just be a huge brawl instead of a match..

EDIT: Beat me to it. I love 8-man tags; this one could be great.

I think we all would have been happy either way, but Regal winning hopefully means he's gonna start wrestling again, which is greatly exciting.

I really hope he takes this King thing as seriously as Booker did. It could be entertaining as hell, especially if he wrestles semi-full time too.

KING REGAL!

I love it. Beth and Nattie could dominate the women's division together.