foleyfanforever88

A. Proofread. A. dont care. read or dont. B. The Rock is listed on the Raw superstars page. Is he in the WWE title division right now? yeah, thats a great argument. are KC James and Idol Stevens making movies? C. I'm tired of arguing with you. Let's get this thread back on topic. Your card sucked. You asked for an opinion, and you got one. Someone else said your card sucked too. Get over it. My card had some good matches, and you're had some really stupid ones.deal with it. EDIT: Ok, in terms of the women's and cruiserweight divisions..any of those people can just switch shows permanently. It's been done before. Nobody really cares about them. But to have main eventers switching shows at any point they want, that would essentially end the brand split. Not something I'm supporting. and to have unified a title division would just as equally end the brand split. wow, so this is what you've been reduced to? when my card was called as being bad, the person who said it had enough decency to offer an actual opinion rather than saying it was shit or not happening, which barely qualifies as an opinion.. permanent switch can be just the same for tag team division. If a superstar isn't active, they aren't in the CURRENT division. Not hard to understand. Unifying ONE division does not end the brand split. I gave you reasons why some of your matches weren't good. Which of my matches were stupid? Ya, none of them. Just stop arguing because you're making yourself look like an idiot...just curious, are you like, a sophomore in highschool?

I like this, except..do you mean Vince and Trump are wrestling? You meant Hogan and Khali wrestling right..? And for everyone..the past few cards haven't included Umaga at all..do you guys think he isn't going to be on the card? Or if he is, against who? I couldn't think of anyone for him.

First of all dude, I'm not criticizing you in here just because we were arguing in the WWE folder..but.. You titled this thread "Another Serious Question About TNA"...yet you didn't ask a question. And also, there's a thread in every folder called "Comments Which Don't Warrant a Thread." That's where you should put comments like this. EDIT: Nevermind.

A. Proofread. B. The Rock is listed on the Raw superstars page. Is he in the WWE title division right now? C. I'm tired of arguing with you. Let's get this thread back on topic. Your card sucked. You asked for an opinion, and you got one. Someone else said your card sucked too. Get over it. EDIT: Ok, in terms of the women's and cruiserweight divisions..any of those people can just switch shows permanently. It's been done before. Nobody really cares about them. But to have main eventers switching shows at any point they want, that would essentially end the brand split. Not something I'm supporting.

James and Stevens aren't active right now..that leaves three teams. Hardly a division. There's a reason why L/K have held the titles so long. Not that I don't like them, but usually the tag titles change more often. With the Hardys and MNM being split between rosters, unifying the titles would make for two more permanent teams and a division of 9 teams. Much better than the situation we're in now. EDIT: Assuming you meant 'redundant', do you know what the word means? Because I don't understand how unifying the tag team division makes the split redundant.

Raw has 4 real tag teams, SD has 3. Carlito/Crazy aren't gonna be a real tag team. I didn't understand your last sentence so I'll ignore it.

Mark Henry isn't coming back to challenge Batista so let's just drop that. The Hardys and MNM have been fueding across the brands for a few months now and that doesn't seem to be over. It's quite likely that they will have one more exciting match, and we've all talked about the four-way TLC I mentioned. They might as well unify the titles so it makes more sense when tag teams show up on the other shows. There isn't a large tag division on either show, might as well make one bigger division. As for Money in the Bank, two ladder matches on one show is overkill; that's why I made it a regular 6 pack challenge. They don't need a gimmick to build that match, only the stipulation that comes with it.

predictions are generally knowledgable guesses..not random things thrown together. in terms of the card though..i think its half ok half shit. Cena w/ Foley vs Shane w/ Vince? What the hell? And Piper has cancer..don't think he's gonna reffing anything at Mania. Taker/Kane vs DX HIAC would be fun, but like a few years ago..and we know Taker has a title shot so this match has 0% chance of happening. Batista vs Hogan? Jesus Christ. Big Show is not gonna come back to fight Booker. Jericho vs Tajiri Extreme Rules? Ok, that match would be fun, but no. And why the hell would you have a 3 way first blood match for the IC title? EDIT: The ECW title match, MITB, and edge/orton are the only things that make sense. I guess I lied, more than half of it is shit. thanks.cant wait for you to post a card.i wasnt trying to follow any storylines. that could have been done easy,i was just trying to alittle differently. I posted a card on the page before this, and it's damn good. I was just saying..we have a fantasy booking area here..you should post stuff like this there, not here, where we're actually talking about realistic WM cards. yeah, you're card? damn good is overrating it. 'decently mediocre' or glimpses of potential' is a better way of putting it. unifying the tag titles andand taking the ladder match out the money in the bank? sorry, dude. kane vs. king booker was good though.just over half was shit.hahaha. I don't know if you noticed when you joined this board, but its called the SMART marks..that's not a requirement necessarily, but it's appreciated. Every one of my matches could logically be made and built up in the next 2 months. Majority of them have also already been hinted at. You just made a second card featuring Batista vs. Mark Henry. Mark Henry is injured, already had a fued with Batista, and sucks as much as Hogan does. Also, Kane is a face and Booker is a heel..why would Kane have Vince and Booker have Trump? Try to think before you come up with shit dude.

predictions are generally knowledgable guesses..not random things thrown together. in terms of the card though..i think its half ok half shit. Cena w/ Foley vs Shane w/ Vince? What the hell? And Piper has cancer..don't think he's gonna reffing anything at Mania. Taker/Kane vs DX HIAC would be fun, but like a few years ago..and we know Taker has a title shot so this match has 0% chance of happening. Batista vs Hogan? Jesus Christ. Big Show is not gonna come back to fight Booker. Jericho vs Tajiri Extreme Rules? Ok, that match would be fun, but no. And why the hell would you have a 3 way first blood match for the IC title? EDIT: The ECW title match, MITB, and edge/orton are the only things that make sense. I guess I lied, more than half of it is shit. thanks.cant wait for you to post a card.i wasnt trying to follow any storylines. that could have been done easy,i was just trying to alittle differently. I posted a card on the page before this, and it's damn good. I was just saying..we have a fantasy booking area here..you should post stuff like this there, not here, where we're actually talking about realistic WM cards.

predictions are generally knowledgable guesses..not random things thrown together. in terms of the card though..i think its half ok half shit. Cena w/ Foley vs Shane w/ Vince? What the hell? And Piper has cancer..don't think he's gonna reffing anything at Mania. Taker/Kane vs DX HIAC would be fun, but like a few years ago..and we know Taker has a title shot so this match has 0% chance of happening. Batista vs Hogan? Jesus Christ. Big Show is not gonna come back to fight Booker. Jericho vs Tajiri Extreme Rules? Ok, that match would be fun, but no. And why the hell would you have a 3 way first blood match for the IC title? EDIT: The ECW title match, MITB, and edge/orton are the only things that make sense. I guess I lied, more than half of it is shit.

ya, this isnt fantasy booking..what you have there is nothing close to what we will get this year

I rarely watch Smackdown (not cause I don't like it, its >>>>> Raw, but because its on Friday), but I might have to tune in for the end of this week's show..it looks to be good.

That is a great WM card. I'm totally behind those World Title matches and the 4 team TLC I've been vouching for since December. The only question I have is if the fans would have anything left after having both a TLC and a MITB before any of the World Title matches. Even if I guess it gives 6 other guys something important to do at Mania I think that could be a bit of overkill with those two huge gimmick matches, so I'd regretfully scrap the MITB, only because I want TLC so badly. The MITB match wouldn't be a ladder match, just a regular 6 pack, first pinfall wins, challenge.

i dont think they will do 2 wrestlemanias in a row where benoit loses the U.S. title Umm..why not? Triple H lost the WHC two years in a row..they don't care about the US title that much anyways.

Flair should NOT be in MITB..I thought about putting in Umaga over Carlito though. MVP is perfect for the MITB match.

Ok, I just came up with this, and I think its the most realistic, exciting WM they could have at this point. Match 1 Finlay def. Benoit© for the US Title in 14:05 Match 2 Mickie James© def. Melina to retain the Women's Title in 5:30 Match 3 MNM def. Hardys, WGTT, and London/Kendrick in a TLC match to unify the tag team titles in 18:12 Match 4 Kane def. King Booker in 8:44 Match 5 Edge def. Randy Orton in 12:55 Match 6 RVD def. Lashley© and Hardcore Holly in an Extreme Rules Match to win the ECW Title in 9:14 Match 7 Hogan (w/ Trump) def. Khali (w/ Vince) in 2:17 Match 8 Cena© def. HBK to retain the WWE title in 35:40 Match 9 Kennedy def. Carlito, Kenny, CM Punk, Monty Brown, and MVP in a regular 6 pack challenge MITB in 12:23 Match 10 Undertaker def. Batista© to win the World Heavyweight Title in 11:25 I was flopping around a lot between which match should go on last, and whether or not Edge and Orton should make it a 4way WWE title match, with Umaga then getting on the card against Foley..but I like this the best and think it would make for a great Wrestlemania..probably the best since 17 if all the matches are good. EDIT: I added times, its about 2 hours of matches.

Better Cena than Batista.....Cena will still be around in 7 years and is obviously their guy........Batista on the other hand. But Batista is a more believable person to beat Taker..bigger, stronger..all of Cena's overcoming the odds has been ridiculous and so unbelievable...I don't want anyone to end the streak, but for me Cena would be as bad as Batista if not worse. Not even close. In fact, Cena/Taker suits the Andre/Hogan dynamic far greater then any other match possible especially Batista. Cena can carry this company for the next decade as he's currently the #1 face all around and has years left on him. Batista is a modern Warrior in that he got over quick but couldn't sustain it and being as bad he is, he really hurts the product. Instead of being batshit crazy, he just gets hurt every 4 months. Cena is just as much of a "believable" threat espeicially given his size and his history. But his history is BULLSHIT...he's overcame so many ridiculous odds..winning triple threats, 4 on 1s, the elimination chamber, matches against guys much bigger than him..it's just so tired and unbelievable.

Better Cena than Batista.....Cena will still be around in 7 years and is obviously their guy........Batista on the other hand. But Batista is a more believable person to beat Taker..bigger, stronger..all of Cena's overcoming the odds has been ridiculous and so unbelievable...I don't want anyone to end the streak, but for me Cena would be as bad as Batista if not worse.

Ok so, that was an AWESOME ending to Raw, and I'd rather see Taker/Cena than Taker/Batista, but if Cena ends Taker's streak..I may never watch Raw again.

my god no

Definitely. Cena/Umaga, while the result, even though obvious, pissed me off, was the most enjoyable match of the night, and probably the best of Cena's defenses in quite a while. There were a few times where I thought Umaga was done (after the splash through the table, the monitor to the head, the first choke out), and when he got back up each time I got a second of hope that he would win the match, but it wasn't to be.

Being discussed in both Rumble threads.

By Khali.

Cena being the one to beat Taker at WM would be just as stupid as Batista being the one to do it. It would be the one thing that would get me to stop watching RAW for good.

How can you honestly not have Mickie in your top 5? She's definitely hotter than Layla, Kristal, and Melina.