Hunter's Torn Quad

...Russo. I thought this show was the start of his booking. Russo started at No Surrender.

I think logic is a dirty word in TNA.

CM Punk got 'rebuilt' in OVW. And Jeff Hardy made his name in WWE.

Convoluted is probably a better word. The point remains.

Why are they making it so complicated? Why not have a simple, easy-to-understand, single elimination tournament?

Monty's problem in WWE would be that he made a somewhat major name for himself in TNA, and WWE like to go out of their way to expose people who made it big in other promotions just to 'prove' that that person is terrible.

It was new jack 4 prez. It was his fifth account.

Blame Leena.

It isn't. But he's gone anyway.

10/24/06 Connzilla - PBP.

The main event will be RVD vs. Big Show in a Ladder match.

The rating was a 3.6.

This is the same D'Amore who pushed for the X-Division in TNA to be total comedy and nothing but spots and brought in Sirelda.

They'll probably have Angle win, then have Joe win the title and push towards Joe vs. Angle II with Angle being build as the only man to ever beat Joe and if he can do it again. As I've explained elsewhere, I think Joe has to win and win clean.

But they ARE losers. They're gonna get beat by LAX...a disappointed Shane Douglas comes in and slaps the Nats around AGAIN...The Nats have had enough and turn on Douglas. It's been building and I thought that would've happened last night but I guess they saved it for the title shot, which is much better. Then why not have The Naturals win, Shane Douglas gets all jazzed up, tells the Naturals he knew they could do it, and then when The Naturals lose against LAX have their split? I know the Naturals are meant to be losers, but what does it say about the tag titles that confirmed losers are getting a title shot? At least make the challengers, and by proxy the title belts, look strong going into their title match.

PWI says that Tully Blanchard has joined WWE, taking the spot on creative that Jim Garvin left open when he quit after being there for five days.

And it was a push that failed miserably. They've apparently been building tension between The James Gang, so I guess that means either Kip is turning heel or he'll be dragging two guys down instead of one.

Thats not actually happen, Federline is just in Nitro's corner. He knows. He's talking about this:

Then why not beat the James Gang instead? It makes more sense to beat a team who aren't heading into a tag title shot than a team that are. At least give the illusion that the team getting a tag title shot aren't losers.

Didn't The Naturals earn their shot in No Surrender's battle royal? Then would it not have made sense for them to win the match instead?

How do the winners of the tag tornado match get nothing but the team who lost get a tag title shot?

Impact did an 0.80 rating. Final quarter with Joe and Angle did an 0.76. F4W And no, that final quarter cannot be spun into good news.

I'm not insisting anything. Just that I can see it happening. And it's not like it would surprise a lot of people if it happened.

I'll ask. I'll say it again, but in the form of a question so people don't bitch; does anyone else see them giving the belt back to Jeff because Kurt took out the referee and he was only the 'ringside enforcer' ? No. Will Russo show up on Impact to redo the Bash at the Beach 2000 promo on Jarrett? They wanted to use the Bash when they thought Hogan was coming in a few years ago.

I'll ask. I'll say it again, but in the form of a question so people don't bitch; does anyone else see them giving the belt back to Jeff because Kurt took out the referee and he was only the 'ringside enforcer' ? No. You think Sting beats Chrstian then loses to the winner of Joe vs. Angle?