Carnival

It was a good video, no doubt. But a good video is not a reason to put a belt on someone. But still, this can't even be considered a feud. So where is the pay-off? If AJ gets the belt tonight i will assume that TNA is just cutting it's loses with the Jarrett title reign. That wastes a year of possible build up so randomly put it on Styles. You might as well make something out of this. Putting the belt on AJ is the most anti-climatic thing TNA could do.

My Gayness

I agree that even 2 months more is too long for Jarrett to have the title. So if they did want to build it for that long, it would suck. At the next PPV. Slammiversary, Jarrett has to drop the title, hopefully to Monty. But i would accept a Styles rematch in which he goes over clean. I just think Styles is a bad idea at this PPV, since they've had zero interaction in the weeks prior to this match. Very bad build.

Mudvayne was pretty good. lots of hot goth bitches. Now i gotta go to Omaha on Monday for RAW. then i gotta go to Omaha again for Mindless Self Indulgence. I hate Omaha.

I think Monty can win this #1 contender thing at the PPV, then Jarrett instantly turn on him. ala Randy and trips. The slow burn started win Monty turned and kept telling Jeff "he owes him one" So I think 1 month of full on face Monty vs Jarrett is enough to get the fans back on Monty's side. Which they pretty much are already.

He won it at a house show the night before a PPv match with JJ. i don't recall which one. it was in 99 though. Then dropped it to JJ on the PPV....YES! from solies title histories... http://www.solie.org/titlehistories/index.html Edge (Adam Copeland) 07/24/99-Toronto, Ontario, Canada Edge substituted for Ken Shamrock (who had transportation problems) as the challenger and won what some speculate may have been a shoot match. 56.Jeff Jarrett [5] 07/25/99-Buffalo, New York (Marines Midland Arena)-Fully Loaded PPV 13:23 Jarrett wins the rematch the next

you're right, I think that is the #1 reason. And i think it did help that WCW put the US titles on main eventers or semi-main eventers. It made it seem more important than WWF's IC title at the time.

AJ is so over with that crowd, he doesn't need the belt right now. It's best served for Monty. Then AJ can have it, and get some good World Title matches with Daniels and others. And if JJ drops the belt and wins it right back, or even gets it back within the year....even as a Jarrett mark...I will agree with everyone else that Jarrett is a glory hog and a cancer for TNA.

99 - Road Dogg - NO 99 - Edge -not then 00 - Rikishi - meh 00 - Billy Gunn - No other NO's 01 - Albert 01 - Jeff Hardy (maybe) 01 - Test

My vote went to CronoT simply cuz i thought he was the only person who had a shot at being more hated than myself. I think mik deserves the win simply cuz he started this thread. And I feel betrayed by my fellow nebraskan. Lushus i can sense that you voted for me.

On the other hand you have the blind Jarrett hater, who can't back up his arguements. I can admit i am biased for Jarrett, but i also can admit when i'm wrong. You instantly hate anyone who doesn't share your opinion, yet you banned MikeSC for the same thing. Now back on Topic. Like I said Jarrett need to drop the belt badly, but Monty is the move they need to make. I'm not with whoever thinks AJ can't be a long term champion. I think he would be a fine champion. Just not now...he could win it from brown, cuz the last thing TNA needs, is Jarrett right back in the hunt for it after he loses it.

And i love every second of it. To say that Jeff NEVER will drop the belt is ignorant. So he's saying he wants to lose to Monty just so they get off his back, then he'll change his mind and try to keep the belt forever. Thats just blind jarrett hate. Now if jeff won't lose to AJ cuz it's bad business...I agree. But if Jeff won't lose to AJ cuz he doesn't want to put him over at all....I disagree. But nobody knows for sure why.

People just need to stop hating on Jarrett. If it wasn't for him they wouldn't have a job in TNA. I agree he should drop the title. But not to Styles...that means you just wasted a year of Jarrett being champion, to put it on Styles on a rushed PPV. Do they not understand pay-offs?

Well I'm not saying Stone cold for example was all an act. I'm just saying he still has to act somewhat. Act like Vince pissed him off or what have you. An Exaggerated version of someone is not the real version. It's close, but it's over the top right? So it's not the real them. It's like them, it's based off them, but it's isn't the real person. It's still an act. I never once said that someone being themselves is acting. I said someone being themselves with the "volume turned up" is acting.

Stupid move on Bubba's part. Cornette had the right to be upset. But we don't know to what extent he chewed him out. But still chill with the ego bubba. that Hall girl should no sell the powerbomb, and just say that the dudley's are weak.

I agree Rudo...they are different. but in many ways they are the same aswell. What makes people buy tickets? When they are into the story. Also people buy tickets just to see the wrestling. But telling the story is the most important part of it. To say you don't like a wrestler's acting is not silly. It's saying that they aren't playing that character very well, either the character is too much of a stretch for them, or the character sucks to begin with. Delivering lines in a promo is acting. No it's not the same as acting in a movie, but it's still acting. I think wrestlers should be wrestlers first and actors second. But they are still actors to a certain extent. HTQ - With "volume turned up", they are still acting, just to a lesser extent. Do you not agree that in a fued there is acting involved. Austin and Rock acted like they hated each other to tell the story. Better example - Kane - tell me he's not acting at all. Tell me that he is just like that in real life. He talks the same and has the same feelings as Kane when he's just sitting at home with his family. If you can't see that Glenn Jacobs is playing the character Kane, then God help you.(no pun intended)

You really think Hogan acts like that in real life? An "exaggerated version" of Terry is still not the real Terry. You think Hogan talks like he's cutting a promo everyday? No, it's part of his character. To play a character, no matter how close it is to the real you, it's still acting. It all just depends on how you define acting. I understand the "volume turned up" thing, thats obvious. I'm not saying that isn't true. I'm just saying it's still acting. They still ACT like a heel or face, they still ACT like they hate someone. They still play a character...to play a character you have to ACT like that character no matter how close to your real life persona it is. The ones that come off the best, have to do the least amount of acting.

True cutting promos used to be ad-libbing some parts. Now it's all scripted. Cutting a promo is acting. Terry Bollea could act....but he could only act like Hulk Hogan. it's the only character he could play well. Cuz he was making the hulk hogan character as much as the writers were. Now wrestlers have less control over what their character has to say or do. So they have to rely more on acting then they ever did before to get over. btw: reciting dialogue = acting

still having this problem? try to ping those sites. by name or IP. try to reset your defaults in your browser. delete cookies and temp files. try another browser.

*poops pants* They got some balls, here we go with the monday night wars..AGAIN!!!! When it's over the WWE will call this one "The Monday Night Annoyance"

Since Lightsabers are real and everything..This is how they work. Here is what i use my lightsaber for.

now he just has to change his sig and he'll be set.

I guess it all depends on how you define acting. I think every one of them is acting. Even if they are themselves with the volume turned up. It's still not themselves. They are acting like they hate the other guy in the ring. i.e. - Triple H acts like he hates Batista. I call it acting, cuz in a sense they are all playing characters. Especially promos.

They are playing a character.....they HAVE to act! This is acting, Promos are acting. That is just obvious.

Ya i think it was Anakin/Vader too. It pisses me off that this is the last Star Wars movie. I want the last 3 to be made....but i know they would suck sooooooo bad. Plus with no Sith...there really is no place to go after ROTJ.