hyperchord24

Okay, enough of this "It's been well documented" stuff. It's getting old.

Don't even tell me they're going to say that Orton put Cena on shelf when they show a video package where Cena is obviously favoring that side of his body during the match before Orton entered the picture.

Which he would do at the expense of an undefeated season. No, I said without cheating. The skepic is going to say that he cheated, which is of course difficult to prove, but there is a lot of evidence that points to it.

Make no mistake about it, the only thing he messed up or is sorry for is getting caught. You can't tell me that was the first or last time Bellechick has done this. The ultimate f-u to the league is winning a superbowl without cheating. I'm just too skeptical to think that he didn't. Yeah, that's right, I said it.

Also in the source coding, the image is called icelandic_jericho, so if it wasn't obvious in the image, it's right there in it's filename. Also, the page's name is www.saveus-222.com/jer Meh, it was fun and mysterious for a little while, but now it's too obvious.

You honestly don't think it's fixed?

What happened?

I'm getting into Killswitch Engage, and I feel guilty about it because I saw one of their videos on TV and thought they were Sevendust. I'll admit I gave them a second listen because the lead singer is black. Because it's something you don't see everyday, I find that interesting. Plus, CM Punk's theme is growing on me, making me feel ultra-markish.

I wonder if other people see this too -- Why is it that people love the drive-thru? There could be a line 6 cars long and people would still wait instead of going in, where 95% of the time it's empty or have to wait for 1 person. Are we THAT lazy? I haven't been through the drive thru for a long time.

I don't know. I was thinking at first that well, she can say whatever she wants because the coach and that goal tender are done and most of her teammates would side with Solo anyway. But then I noticed that the US put up no points. Surely the loss can't be put squarely on the coach's decision to pull Solo, can it?

Are you serious? Steinbrenner turns a profit on the Yankees, even with the gigantic payroll. He's among the very few owners able to do so. I don't think Steinbrenner is one of the worst owners in sports, but don't make it sound as if he's nobly sacrificing millions of his own dollars to try and bring a winner to New York. You're right. I don't know the profit margins for any mlb team, but my point was other teams have the money, they just don't use it to make a better team.

I think that was the one where Liam shows up and claims throat problems then proceeds to go get drunk in the balcony and heckle the band while they're playing without him. If that's not the definition of awesome I don't know what is. It gets even better. When Noel and Liam decided to get rid of the booze and debauchery (some time after Be Here Now) half the band quit.

Punk's title reign is bombing. Time to put the title on Big Daddy V! Well, let's not forget that they were planning on giving the title back to JM after the suspension. This obviously makes the title change all the more likely.

I can put together a good list of reasons Steinbrenner was a bad owner without once bringing up money. Oh, that's fine. I'm not saying he's a saint. But SJR brought up the whole "evil empire" thing and I hate it when people bring that up when talking about the Yankees. Well they are. There is nothing dishonest about it, they built a successful team and they've become the biggest team in baseball. Sometimes sports needs a villian, and the Yankees fill that role. The happiest baseball moments of my life all involve Yankee losses, and the worst involve Yankee wins. I really want to say "if you look at things objectively, you'll see that you should hate your favorite team for not doing what Steinbrenner does," but then again, your correct observation that sports need villians shows that you can't really be objective. EDIT: It's still not a rational way to argue that he's a bad owner. There are other reasons, though.

I can put together a good list of reasons Steinbrenner was a bad owner without once bringing up money. Oh, that's fine. I'm not saying he's a saint. But SJR brought up the whole "evil empire" thing and I hate it when people bring that up when talking about the Yankees.

I was hoping someone would bring up Steinbrenner and the "evil empire." Why is it the evil empire? Because he spends money on a team? Because he ultimately wants above all else to put a winning team on the field every year? Oh, wait, it's because they buy their championships. Right, they have so much more money then every other owner in all of sports and their holding fair competition hostage. I am sick and fucking tired of this played out out, tired, ignorant argument made by Yankee haters. Look, owners of sports teams should accomplish two things -- not lose money and put together a winning team. Other owners could spend as much on their players, but they don't. Why? It's not because they don't have the money. Oh no. They choose not to lose money, which is what Steinbrenner does in his zeal to win. Have you ever heard of an owner getting rich buy investing in a team? Look at the people who have bought teams. People who have already made their money. Steinbrenner is hated because he spends way more on his team than other owners? Steinbrenner is doing what other teams should do to win. But what people don't understand is that the discrepancy between how much the Yankees "make" and other mlb teams is not that much. Other owners CHOOSE not to spend that money on putting a championship team together. So, there really is no "evil empire."

Good point. I don't know how I missed that.

I'm not sure if it's neither here nor there, but wasn't one of the reasons why Dan Reeves fired was because of the lack of depth at QB? Then they go and trade Matt Schaub, when there were doubts about Vick's QB ability?

Do you think I'm the only one who could've thought that "hustle" meant what I thought it meant? Honest question.

I've always hated that expression. Hustling implies decietfulness, disrespectfulness and potentially disloyalty. They really are just buzzwords form the hip hop world thrown together in an effort to give him street cred.

Outstanding match. Great storytelling with Burke picking up the scraps after Dreamer did the work.

You can just make the match a non-title match. Present it as Punk wanted to give the guy a chance to redeem himself and he likes the competition and all that good stuff. Punk could also do commentary for the triple threat match. I like that idea. So if I read correctly the winner of the three way gets the title shot?

And...IT'S ON!!!!! Not exactly sure what they're trying to accomplish here. Vick fucked up. End of story. EDIT: are you KIDDING me?? They (being the audience) are still trying to play the race card, the scapegoat card, the celebrity card to excuse Vick! He DID it. He did it. He did it. What more do you want? No conspiracy, no nothing. He did it.

He's on his honeymoon. Over/under 5 misdemeanors for orton on this honeymoon? Just so long as he keeps his shit out of her bag

EDIT: nevermind. I only heard the last two minutes. Have they ever done the "Mr. McMahon" tease, but instead using shane as the face?