

Hawk 34
Members-
Content count
12469 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by Hawk 34
-
It's like watching a cancer victim cling to life. Pull the plug.
-
Cubs/Reds always looks like a youth game with the defenses.
-
Then...call her. Jeez. Is she still on AIM? That means she isn't doing anything, call her up now.
-
I'm fairly sure we have done this exact topic about 10 different times and in every raw thread this month. There's no new ground to cover. SS are good talents being used in a pointless and idiotic gimmick. So who will make the first wrong statement calling these guys "gay frat boys"
-
They can use Enter Sandman on live shows but they'd have to pay for it on DVD releases. So they should technically be able to use it for RAW.
-
It'd be just over 900, once you factor in taxes. $900 per year is idiotic to spend on WWE ppv, but it's not that much out of a years worth of income. I just can't imagine someone actually being dumb enough to order every ppv from WWE.
-
A ladder won't make RVD/Benjamin better. Anyways, it's time to move onto the Benjamin/Haas feud. However, it appears Haas has already settled in for heat duty.
-
You need to be rich to pay $39.95? That's not that much money. The WWE fanbase is poor, that's been soundly proven for years.
-
So nationally the options are Braves/Dodgers and Reds/Cubs. I still don't get this schedule move from ESPN. At least air some classic baseball, but nope it's an all day boxing marathon. What says Memorial Day like boxing. Paintball/Poker is a joke.
-
Idiot. Do you even know how business works? You don't make your product cheaper when you can make more by charging more, and he will make more. Highway robbery would be if he suddenly charged $49.95 for every single-brand show. Then he'd just be every boxing ppv promoter in the last 10 years. Vince has a fanbase of idiots who will go with the slight price increase, why shouldn't Vince, a businessman try to take more money from these idiots? Also, comparing Vince McMahon, a circus act ringleader to Stalin and Mussolini is a completely moronic thing to say, even if it was just a lame attempt at sarcasm.
-
Vendetta, really was just a one match show for me. As great as Roddy/Danielson was, the rest was flat. There's better Joe/Daniels and Embassy/Gen Next stuff out there. JvPII was obviously great but I wouldn't rec'd as a whole, some shows can lack a ****+ match but still be worthwhile because it was strong throughout.
-
How is $5 more "highway robbery"? It's five dollars. If you are dumb enough to break out $34.95, what is another $5.00 at that point?
-
Lacrosse and Poker > Baseball apparently.
-
Lucky for Chicago, they won't need to worry about pitching to Arroyo this series.
-
That is because it was designed as a impromptu challenge match.
-
The only worthwhile thing for JBL as GM is the return of the JBL/HHH confrontations which went nowhere.
-
One of those fans will be starting before the break.
-
Is there any player in MLB who provokes a "oh shit, not him" from the fans reaction when you need to tie the game and you got RISP, then Adam Dunn?
-
We know it's a cell phone #, since someone confirmed it or whatever. So it won't be a professional place of business. I'd love for it to be some sort of male escort service company, though.
-
Melina has issues with Sharmell, Booker being her husband stood up for Sharmell. Batista, being close to Melina...you figure it out. It's just high school all over again.
-
Probably. You always start to think it might change but come October 1st, yep Atlanta is first in the division.
-
It's higher. A $5 difference and probably the wrong direction to go. It should return to $29.95 for all non Mania shows. Realistically, tacking on another $5 isn't much but I don't think it was a good move because people are already iffy on plopping $35 down, $40 might just be too much. So does this mean Mania will be $54.95 next year?
-
The only reason for doubts is merely the timing with Mercury and Masters, aside from that I don't think there would be a hint of suggestion towards it being a cover.