dh86

Michigan would probably would win yet lose 31-14?....just using your quotes You're so stupid you don't know when someone's being sarcastic, aren't you? Either you are saying Michigan would lose to Florida by 17 on a neutral site or Michigan would beat Florida yet isn't the second best team. Who is the stupid one?

No its not, western carolina is a 2-9 1-AA team. I guess Michigan should have scheduled Grand Valley State and blew them out so we would be 12-1 too. and even you are saying Michigan is the second best team......so whats the discussion?

Michigan would probably would win yet lose 31-14?....just using your quotes

This is my final post of the night. As what Kirk Herbstreit said, in determining the number 2 team, if the voter thinks about "not wanting a rematch" or "teams having their shots" they should not vote. The current BCS system says vote the number 1 team in America versus the number 2 team. Meaning irregardless of conference, style points, if they played the number 1 team already. If I hear someone say Florida deserves to play in the National Championship, I want to hear it followed up with justification as to why they are better than Michigan. Michigan not winning their conference is irrelevant since every team is a runner up to OSU in the regular season. I want the voters to look back at the body of work throughout the season also look at Florida and Michigan's lone defeats. Lastly, I want voters and all of you to consider if Florida lined up against Michigan next week, what would happen?

......right Well isn't that the argument for Michigan? "BUT THE GAME WAS GREAT! WOULDN'T YOU WANNA SEE IT AGAIN?!" The arguement is that they are better than Florida. What a noble concept Says who? A Michigan fan? No thanks. Of all the people that say Michigan should not be in the championship game.The vast majority of them never actually say Florida/USC is actually a better team than Michigan. There are lways a subjective comment..Take that as you will

lol at CBS openly campaigning for Florida...wow Gary EVERY TEAM IS 2nd PLACE TO OHIO ST objectivity is no longer a requirement for broadcasters now

......right Well isn't that the argument for Michigan? "BUT THE GAME WAS GREAT! WOULDN'T YOU WANNA SEE IT AGAIN?!" The arguement is that they are better than Florida. What a noble concept

......right

are you sure about that?

people are letting their bias dictate who they think should be in the title game...it is number 1 vs number 2....not number 1 vs a team they didnt play

and Florida lost to Auburn, a worse team than Ohio State so what are you saying?...just watch the rematch when it happens and enjoy it

going from a monster heel in big show to..........a monster heel in lashley=not good for business

dont forget Auburn 2 years ago

great idea but I still prefer the 8 team playoff for injury reasons and what not...no matter how big a playoff it is there will be teams crying snub...look at the basketball tournament

a title match on smackdown...yet no title defense on the 40 dollar ppv?

A top 10 pick requires so big of an investment that I am very apprehensive of the Lions taking a lineman or a linebacker with that pick. Like Ernie Sims will probably be a pretty good player that we took at 10 but how much of an impact on a team will he have as an outside linebacker versus Leinart or Cutler would as quarterbacks?

no matter what ND does they wont pass Michigan

I wouldnt even trust Millen to trade down in the draft properly. Teams would probably try to fleece him kinda like Broncos fleeced Washington a couple years back. In a draft, there are no exact science there are just as good of a chance your OT could turn out like Robert Gallery as your QB turning out like Ryan Leaf. Millen made Jeff Backus one of the top three highest paid tackles in the league so I doubt we would go after Joe Thomas or Jake Long. Trading down is the best policy usually though but if we stay at number 1 I would take the quarterback...at least James Hall and Cory Redding has been serviceable at times. Kitna is a turnover waiting to happen and I could imagine Josh being the same

College Football does not have a playoff so one loss obviously will stand way out on a team's season. Especially if it is their only loss.

Matt Millen,with most likely the number 1 pick to use? I am shuddering at the thought of that. I am hoping for Brady Quinn but with Jon Kitna as the quarterback of our future, I am expecting Calvin Johnson

Losses to the Buckeyes and the Beavers are like comparing losses to the Colts and 49ers.

Georgia Tech's the top team in the ACC before the conference has even been determined. Okay then. I think you need a fucking brain transplant, you goddamn illiterate homer. I shouldn't have to say USC is a better team than Michigan because they are. How the fuck would it help any kind of argument to just throw out a "USC's better!" sentence? If they weren't, Michigan would have WON. Stop arguing on behalf of a loser and embarassing other Michigan fans here who can produce actual reasoned arguments. You know how USC's loss was different from Michigan's? I'll tell you AGAIN: USC was a failed two point conversion AS TIME EXPIRED from sending their game with Oregon State into overtime. Michigan was finished with two minutes left to play. That's the difference. Also, despite THREE takeaways, Michigan was still outgained by 106 yards, converted less than half of their third down opportunities, and had a disadvantage (three minutes, not so much of a big deal) in the time of possession. A GREAT team, the kind that it will take to beat Ohio State this year, a CHAMPIONSHIP caliber team, which is what the title game is about, would be able to actually make something happen out of those turnovers. Also, only four of their scoring drives started in their own territory. The other two started on Ohio State's 25 and 9 yard lines. They lost, they're not going to the title game, get over it and stop trying to ruin what was a civil year of college talk here without Dama around. He's referenced because he was doing the same shit you are now except with Oklahoma instead. I shouldn't have to say USC is a better team than Michigan because they are. How the fuck would it help any kind of argument to just throw out a "USC's better!" sentence? I believe you just did " A GREAT team, the kind that it will take to beat Ohio State this year, a CHAMPIONSHIP caliber team, which is what the title game is about, would be able to actually make something happen out of those turnovers. " And losing to a 7-4 team makes USC a...... If they weren't, Michigan would have WON. Stop arguing on behalf of a loser and embarassing other Michigan fans here who can produce actual reasoned arguments. Alright, so Michigan could not win at Columbus because they are not better than USC? Okay. (btw, where were all of this USC talk coming from you prior to their current toss up with Michigan?)

I will try to do that from now on. Sorry for the Dave Meltzer impersonation

dama must have been one loved guy if he's being brought up everyday randomly

ok but Michigan lost by 3 to the number 1 team...according to your astute logic...USC had their chance against Oregon State who I doubt is even a top 60 team and lost...and according to your intelligent fact checking...USC played catch up all game to Oregon State and was down a bigger margin than Michigan ever was to OSU...determining the number 2 team this year...you have to weigh...should you vote for the team you WANT to see in the title game...or the team that DESERVES to be in the title game?...if there are more people like you out there (please God no) then I guess we are going to see the 'sexy' matchup and the possibility of a split national title ensues particularly if Notre Dame is in the title game....enjoy Christ, you ARE the Michigan Dama. Did Michigan have a chance to win at the very end of the game and fail on a two point conversion? NO. They got their decks checked in the second quarter and were fortunate enough to get a couple of takeaways to keep it close. At no point in the game did they appear to be a better team, and never lead after the first quarter. Michigan would deserve to be in the title game if they won on Saturday. They didn't. Enjoy the Rose Bowl against West Virginia and try not to be embarassed like Georgia was when they underestimated them last year. Besides, it's become rather obvious that Lloyd Carr can't beat Jim Tressel, so why try again? Just pull your Boomer Sooner, I mean, Big Blue fingers out of your ears and understand that assertions that a team that just lost their final game does not imply that they don't even deserve a cable hookup to watch other teams play in bowls. It means they can't play for the title. It's football, and if they were better, they would have won, period. Yeah, Northwestern had a chance to beat Michigan because they were playing them. In your deluded little (not big) blue world, that's interpreted as some prediction of Wildcat victory. And HOW long ago was it when I said Clemson could end up in the title game? Like, around the time they waxed Georgia Tech and hadn't done their usual Bowden swan dive? Notre Dame is NOT the best team USC will play all year. That would be Ohio State on January 8th. Regular season-wise, USC's most impressive win would be against Cal in my mind, possibly Nebraska if they can win the Big XII. "OH YA CAL WHO LOST TO ARIZONA THEY SUCK BALLZ" Yeah, the same Arizona that's won four straight. Close ball game my ass, Notre Dame's best chance at beating USC was a year ago. Michigan destroyed them for a reason, because beating up on military academies, a team whose coach was axed before the end of the season (oh wait, two), a Pac-10 jobber that was lucky to win a game this season, and a couple of middling Big Ten teams makes a GREAT resume for a "BCS caliber" team. You said it yourself, Michigan beat their asses, at home, and you think that helps their image against USC on the road? And who would REALLY give a flying fuck about a rematch beyond national title interest? Not only is there no competitive reason for one, but there's no want for one. Does anyone else remember the period a year ago where Miami and Florida State played like, three times in one calendar year? It got worse each time and produced uglier and uglier games. I'd wager it did a great deal to fuck with their respective images since you saw one or the other lose three times within a short period. oh shit I forgot the first part lol.....but you tell me young lady....a 2 point loss to oregon state is now= to a 3 point loss to ohio state...and after all the words you have typed..you have failed to type one thing (that im sure you'll do after the fact)...you have yet to say that USC is a better team than Michigan thanks