luke-o

I didnt think id find someone on here who would agree with me. Thank you.

yes, i clearly said that. Learn to read before you put words in my mouth. And street fighter vs DC? it's possible since Capcom arent doing Marvel games now, and it would put some much needed life into the cross over fighters. Just played it again while on my break from work, better resolution on the dreamcast. The dreamcast has a better frames per second rate than the PS2. Just makes for a better experience. I only use the triggers for taunts, its easier to Dans level three taunt that way. Use the face buttons for your hard punches and kicks, makes for a better arcade experience.

I was talking to my manager about this on Saturday. The general gamer would be most likley intimaidated by the new style of playing from Nintendo and are more likley to opt for the Playstaion as its the simple alternative. This is were sony succeeds and they do it very well. They offer a machine that anyone can pick up and play. Its a great idea, its just not for me. Ninetndo is for the hardcore gamer that wants to try something diffrent. If it fails, it fails. At least they tried something new. No, but at least its something new.

Maybe fued Lethal with Williams. Give him the push.

No, i said they were ALMOST acrade perfect. That was the most nonsensical agrument i have ever seen. And i know the post doesnt make much sense, but i am doing work at the same time. It make sense on the most part to me, maybe not a lot, but at least some. Main point was that the Dreamcaset controls for the game were and still are better than the PS2s.

Metal Gear 4, a sequel of a sequel of a sequel of a sequel of a game that made its name on NINTENDO. Even though it has shiny graphics, its still Metal Gear Solid. Beacuse there the only ones offering something diffrent! And before you say anything, i know MGS didnt start on Nintendo, so dont throw that one at me.

I never said that, i said they were better on the Dreamcast. the Neo is arcade perfect. They just play better on the Dreamcast. The controlls are sloopy when playing on the dreamcast you actually feel like your playing the game, because the PS2 pad is so light and the buttons are so close to the surface it makes the game to easy, hence why its easy to button mash on games like Tekken. This doesnt make for a good gaming experience. If you can complete KOF on the dreamcast you feel like you've accomplished something as the buttons on the pad are unforgiving. When you complete it on the PS2, you've got nothing to show for it. Its that simple. Do you know what the best thing about this argument is? Its giving me something to do other that University work haha!

And what games are being hyped for the PS3? Metal Gear solid FOUR Gran Turismo FIVE Tekken SIX and ive no doubt a million other EA football games. Yes, Nintendo are releasing sequels, but at least it will be a new way of playing them. Instead of playing the same game i can buy on the PS2 just with slightly worse graphics.

Then why do they look and play like shit? These games play better on the Dreamcast and on the Saturn. It's that simple. Now whos being deluded? Your missing my point, the reason they work better on these consoles is because thats what they were designed for. The neo geo was designed to run arcade games at an arcade perfect level. The PS2 isnt. And thats fine, i know it wasnt built to run these types if games, i just want to know why they bother realeasing them when they know they look like shit.

bullshit. The reason the cube failed is the same reason the Dreamcast failed, no one bought into it. Beacuse Sony made this big loud noise as the "new alternative" and everyone went for it. I went for it, im not going to deny it, but after a load of shit games and having my PS1 brake a billion times i got sick if it and went back to my Mega Drive and Snes where they have games that are class and never brake. Granted Nintendo will never be back at the top again, and that doesnt bother me to much. If you wanna keep buying the same console rehashed with a larger price tag then be my guest. I on the other hand am not buying into any more of Sony's bullshit. Im sticking with Nintendo, not for retro value, but they are the only company the offering something NEW to the console war.

Yeah but Capcom fighting Jam was a crap game. This argument is pointless as we have different opions on the subject. I've never met someone who claims to be "the best player on Tekken" as all of my mates are die hard Street Fighters. If sony didnt want them released on their console, then why did they release them? Of course every console has crap games, just not on the scale of the PS2. I work in a second hand game store and the amount of crap games we get traded in is staggering. It beggers belief why they even bother. And i could do with 5000 bucks. Its not a bad idea. But why bother when it plays better on the Dreamcast? I can understand what your saying, but my argument is that if Sony know they look shit and play shit, then why bother relaseing them? It just furthers my point that Sony basterdized the gaming world buy being money hungry cock touchers.

I know, i wasnt even aware that it had started.

I've said this for a while now, IMO, sony and microsoft ruined the console industry, i miss the console wars of the early nineties.

D'oh! I cant spell. For starters, Resi 4 was better on the Cube. And you seem to forget that for every good game on the PS2, theres about 60 shit ones. Have you seen these things running? They tried putting 3D graphics into the backgrounds and just fuck it up. Plus for the fighters most part they look imposed onto screen. It's simple, 2D fighters look shit on the PS2 because the PS2 wanst built for these fighters. Which begs the question, why do Sony release them? Oh yeah, there greedy twats. I've had this said to me on many occasions. My friend at work, who claims the same things you do, challenged me to a fight on Tekken. I mashed the buttons and won. Wow, what great skill that required. 2D fighters are just better than 3D fighters, plain and simple.

I wouldnt have a problem wityh Brown if he was consistent in the ring and his promos werent so lame.

I look forward to the replay here in the UK next sunday. Just to see Joe muscle buster JJ. And i would have liked to see AJ/Daniels get the belts. AMW have ben champs for far too long.

See, even the competition thinks we should be the W!! I'm so getting one on relese date. And thank fuck for that. I was getting worried. No i just need FFXIII to come out on the W!!....

Hey, does anyone know if the Marvel heroes game is going to be on PS3 only? i dont want to buy one so ifs coming out on th W!! i'll feel much better.

Ill put one by for you tommorow, just tell him that student put it back for you.

Trust me on this one, no one beats me at 2D beat em up arguments haha! Then why do they look so shit? I was playing KoF 2003 today on there and it looked terrible, i dont know why they bother. At least your honest. No it isnt. The dreamcast one was. I never said they were bad on the xbox, they can do 2D beat em ups fine. not great but its better than Sony's effort. SNK have made the best 2D fighter except for Street Fighter, King of Fighters. Plus mark of the wolf which is fuckin superb.

i was wondering why i was enjoying TNA so much this month, i didnt have to see his useless waste of air time face.

Saying that, rumours are that Sonjay is going to join forces with Nash to set up a Sabin/Dutt fued. He's been trying to get into a storyline for ages.

And i cant wait to see it. Although id have changed the booking and would have had Joe turn on Sting to set up a match for them at slamiversary. Would have made more sense and would have completed Joes heel turn.

Ta, oh and by the by, just watched that impact episode. not too shabby but not great either. My housemate did make the point during the Cage/Shelly match, "christian, your not the rock, dont try to be like the rock."