The media is going to have a field day with this one. With no defendant to stand trial, WWE is going to be the ones blamed in the media because of the steroids, even if there is no evidence of there being a direct correlation between them and the murders.
http://www.pwtorch.com/artman/publish/article_20634.shtml
PWTorch.com has learned that one major media entity has received an email purporting to be from a friend of the Chris Benoit extended family saying that Benoit accidentally killed his wife in a domestic argument, then panicked and killed his son later so his son could be with his mother rather than grow up without a mom and knowing his father as a murderer.
I wouldn't put much weight into this description as it could have been written before all this happened.
Notice at the end how it says "every Tuesday" like it's a general description for the show.
I'm guessing a lot of those are fakes which were "signed" in the last day.
The WWE Shopzone site has a Wrestlemania plaque with a piece of ring rope and a photo signed by all the winners from the last WM including Benoit, however the description no longer lists Benoit as having signed it.
Anyone think Taker might win via DQ or countout? The match keeps getting billed as "title vs streak" but Batista could retain while keeping Taker's streak intact for another year.
Despite all the buzz surrounding Kurt Angle's TNA debut, Impact did only a 0.9 rating last night which is what it has been doing lately without Angle.
Meanwhile, the Ultimate Fighter did a 1.0, one of its lowest ratings ever.
Credit: WrestlingObserver.com
So after saying that the "EC F'N W" shirt was too "crass" and would turn away potential advertisers, they have now taken the high road with this beauty:
Seating capacity would change for an event like this. You'd add thousands of seats on the floor, but I'd imagine if they were afraid of not selling it out, they'd have a huge entrance set up that could take away 10,000+ seats if they wanted to.
So no random tests for marijuana or alcohol, only if they have "reasonable cause" to ask them to be tested. I wonder who in the WWE determines reasonable cause. "Hey, RVD looks high - should we test him?" Seems kind of subjective.