Obi Chris Kenobi

Yes, I really noticed this when they had the 2 hour PrimeTime special last year, then a PPV a week or so later. If TNA goes 2 hours they NEED to start moving around the country.

Oh at the same time, sorry just woke up.

Doesn't that honor belong to AJ Styles?

Oh dear, Dustin Rhodes is in TNA? Does he look like he did when he was WCW?

Thanks for the updates btw. So far this PPV sounds like a complete borefest, glad we get it for free in the UK. However, I did enjoy the Roode/Young fued - I wonder if it'll evolve into Young trying to win Ms.Brooks' freedom from Roode.

TNA are blind to the fact of how over Alex Shelly is, he's always pushed as a heel and that, but the gets cheered no matter what, people chant his name no matter what - even when he writes remarks about the 'impact zone' crowd on his myspace. Hope they do get pushed, and I'm glad they didn't do the job to Lynn and Backlund.

Surely HHH will be face by proxy for the first few shows - just like he was when he first came back. People are so happy to see him again they cheer.

Actually, I'd almost like to see Sting V Vince if it was done in a well thought out manner and not a Vince squashes another WCW talent.

What would you be excited about WWE doing with Sting, if he signed?

hahahah no, shit. Well, spotted.

I'm happy they've resigned Puma, I thought he was decent during the World X Cup a few years ago.

I'd be curious enough to give it some serious consideration... but then I'd just download it (allegedly)

I really like the look Sting has when he doesn't have his face paint on has his hair slicked back and is wearing those dark sun glasses. He looks like a right heel mafia boss type, he should go with it.

I guess the only good thing that Sony has going for it, is that Blu-Ray seems more popular then HD-DVDs at the moment.

I'm not sure, but after the Benoit incident my interest in wrestling has kinda wained, at least for the last month or so. It's started to slowly come back now, in that I can watch short blasts of ROH or TNA. I stopped watching in 2001 when the invasion angle faded away leaving a bad taste in my mouth, so I guess if WWE destroyed any really amazing promising angles with their bad booking I might stop watching them again.

She turned heel when they piped in the canned heat. I think the feud is loosely going on, its not one I'm totally interested in so don't pay much attention when they mention it, but it seems to be mentioned now and again. I don't think it's going to help get Lance Hoyt over though, I'm not sure anything will. In all honesty they should give BG and Kip James their release and let them go.

I think it'd be wrong, really, really, wrong. I have no reason why, but there's just something about it that would leave a bad taste in my mouth - maybes its the feeling that WWE would trash his legacy and gimmick like they did with all the WCW guys that came over after the buyout. I saw else where on the board that WWE wanted Sting to be Cena's Mentor, and Cena had the Sting Make Up on, and that doesn't seem right at all.

I agree with the Wolfpac Sting and TNA Sting comments. Wolfpac Sting didn't make sense after everything he stood for over the 18 months before hand. TNA's Sting just seems rehashed, dated and drawn out.

In all honesty I've been waiting for, what seems like, ages for them to pull the trigger on a New Hart Foundation with these guys. I really miss my stables, having been watching some 97-99 WWF/WCW stuff. GIVE US SOME GANG WARFARE!

Maybes he meant Vince? I'm not sure - I do remember the Raw after RR where he cried in the ring and said goodbye to the fans, that was nice.

I really would have liked to have seen that fued spread out and crossed over with the Abyss/Mitchell storyline. It would have have made for some great matches and TV. On a side note a lot of people have been saying they'd like for TNA to go back to early 2003, wasn't that the whole Vince Russo run?

Minimum wage in the UK is £5.35 an hour, so just over $10 an hour, so I guess it works out to be just a little more expensive when you put it that way. Wii's are £279 which would make it just over $525, so I guess the difference isn't that great, and certinaly compared to the PS3 the difference isn't anywhere near as bad.

Pretty much people thought that they were getting the PS3's that NA/Japan got rolled out and ready to PS2 games - this was probably due to customers reading internet reports and Sony/stores not relying the information correctly. However, alot of people who have PS3's still have their PS2's, so they don't seem too bothered about playing PS2 games on their PS3. And yeah Fifa and PES will sell no matter what, even if they had 'this game is shit, don't buy it' on the front cover. Microsoft have a 12 month deal with PES, which runs out in November, which means that it isn't available on PS3 as a game, or BC. As for PS3s selling equal to NA in half the time, that's because UK consumers are fickle shits that like to look trendy and absorb brands like plants with sunlight. If its hyped they will come.

In the UK anyway, at least Newcastle and the people I serve, people aren't that bothered about playing their old PS2 games on their PS3 - we had one Console traded in because he couldn't play his PS2 games on it. We told him he could but didn't like the round about way to get them working. I swear you can watch the sales sore in the UK once Fifa and PES comes out, its all anyone wants.

You know Adam Ryland is making an MMA game at the moment?