J.T.

I think the Taker/Kennedy match will end up being a SS-style match.

I say the last three macthes end up being: Flair Piper Duggan Slaughter Dusty Vs SS, Eugene Haas, Vis, Cade, Murdock, Teachers Pets, Heymans Roit Squad, Burke Terkay Vs Cryme Time, Highlanders, London, Kendricks, FBI, Sandman, Dreamer Taker, Carlito, Vito, Balls, Crazy Vs Kennedy, Benjerman, Holly, Regal, Masters

He meant that we know what the next three are via Spoilers, so a new match to us probably wont be announced till Sunday

Off for a week.

Tonights episode was amazing. Wells being a sleezeball was great because Harry saw it coming but wanted to believe otherwise. The comedy club ending could have been cliche, but the speech in the dressing room prevented that. Little things like Jordan wanting friends splashed in there makes the show go by real quick with never a dull moment. I still wish I saw more Danny, but I was real glad Cal got a real storyline. The little things were great and thats what makes this show better than most.

Oh, SNAP! J.T. didn't think it was "funny." He sure told me! And, as we can see, he made quite a well executed argument telling us why. Your clever use of the contraction "wasn't" in front of the word "funny" was quite insightful. Thank you for posting that, J.T. I feel really enlightened by your explanation. Please feel free, the future, to educate us on what color you think the grass is, in your typical persuasive style. I'm really looking forward to it. I don't understand how we can have three consecutive posts discussing why the article wasn't "funny," but not a single one of you bothered to address what the point of the article was or whether that point was valid. I mean, I didn't laugh either, but I can at least appreciate the irony of using tired, cliched criticisms of Saturday Night Live to describe a show that is (in part) a weekly criticism of Saturday Night Live. But, hey, no discussion of that. You obviosuly posted an article that was trying to be funny. It was not, so I thought I should say so. It struck me as odd that someone would post that, since it didnt achieve its goal. You can relax, hommie.

I'll ask. I'll say it again, but in the form of a question so people don't bitch; does anyone else see them giving the belt back to Jeff because Kurt took out the referee and he was only the 'ringside enforcer' ? No. You think Sting beats Chrstian then loses to the winner of Joe vs. Angle? Pretty much.

Hey, you picked a bad wrestler instead of a good wrestler. I GET IT!!!!!!!!!!!! *stares at the guy who made the bad joke*

That wasn't funny.

I have enjoyed every episode. I love that there is so many charicters and that they can expand on all of them so much. I love the many subplots and that its not just one big issue with everyone else just there.

Shawn. Id get the real good matches from a lot of diffrent people in a lot of diffrent settings.

So...is there any chance AmDrag loses the strap to anyone but Homicide?

Dane Cook > SNL Cast

Sports Night was such an unbeliavble show. So if Studio 60 gets only 2 years and the mass doesnt get it, I'll still be happy.

Because a premier brings in people who really wanna see heroes and have zero interest in the brand that is NBC. Plus to think that a show like Heroes has teh same audience that Studio 60 has is not smart. AND might I add that Monday at 10 is a shitty place to be since CSI Miami and Studio 60 have the same demo. I think is just stupid for anybody to judge a shows ratings after 1 or 2 weeks. Ditto for a company like NBC to be "dissapointed" after this amount of time. There is a reason NBC is getting its ass kicked in the ratings. One of them is over reacting to both postive and negative ratings after little time.

How can you make that statement after 1 week. Plus Heroes was the Premier, tough to judge because of that/