Kahran Ramsus

I never ordered Super Size so this doesn't affect me at all. But can't people who don't want it just, you know, order the smaller size?

Bret Hart's main events. Both Bret & HBK were main eventing at basically the same time so they are a fair comparison. Bringing Austin in isn't. I'm sure he would crush them both anyways. Summerslam 1992 - 1.5 Survivor Series 1992 - 1.4 Royal Rumble 1993 - 1.25 Wrestlemania IX - 2.0 Wrestlemania X - 1.68 King of the Ring 1994 - 0.85 Summerslam 1994 - 1.3 Survivor Series 1994 - 0.9 Royal Rumble 1995 - 1.0 Survivor Series 1995 - 0.57 (Boy Diesel sure did a lot in that year he had the belt.) In Your House 5 - 0.3 Royal Rumble 1996 - 1.1 In Your House 6 - 0.77 (Notice how Bret has brought the buyrates back up.) Wrestlemania XII - 1.2 It's Time - 0.35 Final Four - 0.5 Summerslam 1997 - 0.8 Survivor Series 1997 - 0.89 AVG BUYRATE: 1.02 MEDIAN BUYRATE: 1.1 Shawn Michaels Survivor Series 1992 - 1.5 Wrestlemania XI - 1.3 In Your House 3 - 0.7 Wrestlemania XII - 1.2 GFBE - 0.65 Beware of Dog - 0.45 King of the Ring 1996 - 0.6 International Incident - 0.37 Summerslam - 0.58 (Worst Summerslam ever. Diesel/Mabel did better.) Mind Games - 0.48 Survivor Series 1996 - 1.3 (The 0.58 number given by prowrestlinghistory.com seems more likely, but I'll give Shawn the benefit of a doubt.) Royal Rumble 1997 - 0.7 Ground Zero - 0.45 Badd Blood - 0.6 Survivor Series 1997 - 0.89 D-Generation X - 0.44 Royal Rumble 1998 - 0.97 Wrestlemania XIV - 2.3 Survivor Series 2002 - 0.86 Armageddon 2002 - 0.87 Summerslam 2003 - 0.94 AVG BUYRATE (SS 96 = 1.3): 0.825 AVG BUYRATE (SS 96 = 0.58): 0.79 MEDIAN BUYRATE: 0.7 Either way he is significantly lower than Bret Hart. Plus Shawn's good buyrates can be explained more easily for the most part, especially Royal Rumble 1998 & Wrestlemania XIV where the real draws were Austin/Tyson (compare them to DX in Dec 1997, where it was basically Shawn's show) and Summerslam 2003 where he was not an integral part of a multi-man match (HHH/Goldberg was the issue). Using the medians, which are probably better for skewered data sets such as this Bret Hart outdrew Shawn Michaels by about 64%.

He was on the ballot. ... Do you just make shit up half the time? CNN said he wasn't so blame them. They still voted for a guy who dropped out of the race two weeks ago and was the biggest failure in the history of the Democratic Party.

Considereing they gave him the primary when he wasn't even on the ballot, I would say the chances of the whole state joining New Hampshire is pretty slim.

What about John Heidenwhatever?

Sid. Both times he main evented there was a near ***** match in the midcard as the secondary main event.

Bret Hart was a reasonably good draw during the dark ages. Certainly not as good as the big 3, but his PPVs from 1994-1996 (with the exception of Dec IYH 1995) easily outdrew the ones headed by Diesel or Shawn Michaels. Randy Savage drew really good gates from 1986-1989, but he never headed a PPV without Hogan. It is reasonable to assume that based on his other numbers, that he could have, but it was a different era. As far as top draws of the post-Hulkmania era go, Savage was probably #4.

http://www.razzies.com/asp/24thAwards.htm?...w&articleid=185 No surprises here.

Just the packaging I imagine.

I not a huge Orton fan, but lets be realistic here.

He's not Brock, that's for sure. He isn't even on Orton's level.

I like varients, simply because I like having a choice. I certainly wouldn't buy all three. The third option up there looks the best.

This just paves the way for Al Sharpton to take the nomination. Realistically, this was over after the 7 States.

I don't know.

Hmmm at least next time some idiots say "HBK drew like a Mo fo for WWE", I have proof he's even WORSE of a draw than Diesel, who only Main Evented 1 of the 10. Plz look up WM14's buyrate and then tell me how much HBK can't draw. Austin would have drawn that if he was fighting the Brooklyn Brawler in the main event. Two people involved in the main event drew that buyrate, and neither was the champion.

My understanding is that if Bonds, Giambi & Sheffield were caught using steroids that they would be guilty of perjury and that this was the real issue here.

I'm not sure whether she was racist or just senile.

LXG was probably on the short list, but there was no reason for Hulk, T3 or Freddy vs. Jason to get nominated.

New York loses 2 guys that they absolutely need to have in their lineup. They already have pitching problems (Brown got hurt after two days with the Yanks, and Lieber is still out). Unless you expect A-Rod to do it all himself. That sure worked in Texas didn't it? Assuming they do lose Giambi and Sheffield (lets ignore the case that they don't for now), does anyone else think they can still beat Boston?

Well, black people can drink at the fountains, too. They just have to drink at their own "coloreds" fountain. Thanks for making my point for me. Gays don't have to go through that.

Senators Blue Jays Packers Raptors

Just as important, both the Giants and Yankees need these guys or else their WS hopes just flew out the window. Good news for Toronto and San Diego though.

We have a prediction thread, but this will be for the actual event as it takes place tonight.

It should be noted that of the ten worst buyrates ever, Shawn Michaels main evented half of them. The guy really couldn't draw at all.

You mean polar bears. And beavers, of course...